There’s always something to howl about.

Category: Zillow.com (page 8 of 13)

East Valley Tribune slams Board of Appraisal over Zillow.com censorship, endorses Reagan amendments to SB 1291

In general, newspapers influence people who are paying attention, a small but inordinately important minority. Today the East Valley Tribune, clarion of the populous suburbs east of Phoenix, came out strong for Zillow.com and other consumer-oriented Automated Valuation Models:

Arizona home buyers and property speculators are fortunate the state Board of Appraisers did something against their interests while the Legislature is still in session, so lawmakers can act immediately to put a stop to it.

The Board of Appraisers is going after Zillow.com, a year-old Web site that offers free estimates of market values for an estimated 70 million houses across the country. The state agency contends the site is offering property appraisals without an Arizona license, and has ordered it to remove these “zestimates” or face formal sanctions and a possible lawsuit.

But Zillow.com makes no claim that its estimates are based on actual visits to individual properties or research of their histories. Instead, the Web site gathers sale details about other homes in the same neighborhood that have recently changed hands, government tax valuations and other publicly available information, and then provides a rough prediction about a house’s value under current market conditions.

More:

Given recent reports about widespread mortgage fraud and foreclosures resulting from inflated purchase appraisals, the state Board of Appraisers should be working to increase the amount of information available to consumers rather than shuttering potential sources of knowledge.

At least the Legislature appears to see the wisdom of this. On Monday, Rep. Michele Reagan, R-Scottsdale, introduced an amendment to SB1291 that was endorsed by her House colleagues to protect free opinions about property values as long as the provider doesn’t claim or imply that they are formal appraisals.

Putting Reagan’s amendment into law would be a nice endorsement of free speech and the consumer’s right to multiple sources of information.

None of this is news to people following the story here, and, in fact, the most-recent events are not covered. But this is the kind of public outcry that can swing the balance against this silly stunt by the Board of Appraisal.
< ?php include("Zapraisails.php"); ?>

Technorati Tags: , , , , Read more

State vs. Zillow.com will be a lengthy bout

This is me in today’s Arizona Republic (permanent link). This goofy little column often “breaks news” in the sense that I cover facts that have not yet been reported by the Republic‘s real estate reporters. Normally I keep this to myself, because I don’t want to frighten the people who were kind enough to give me the column. This week I told my editor that were were “scooping” the newspaper, and gave him resources for vetting the facts presented below. The consequence? At the top of the story is says, “Special to the Republic.” Top that, Hildy Johnson.

(Just between us, I’m pretty sure I’m mangling the citation of the standing law. It’s Chapter 32, not 36, but even then I don’t know how it should be properly cited. Newspapers have style books for stuff like this. This will do: ARS 32-3601 et seq.)

State vs. Zillow.com will be a lengthy bout

The ongoing saga of Arizona vs. Zillow.com will not end.

When the state Board of Appraisal recently revealed that it had sent cease-and-desist letters to the Seattle Web-based real estate start-up in July and November, it failed to disclose that it had language pending in the Arizona Legislature that would have conclusively outlawed Zillow.com and other consumer-oriented Automated Valuation Methods.

That legislation, Senate Bill 1291, seemed to be on an under-the-radar track to easy passage until its existence was discovered by the LittlePinkHouses.com real estate blog.

The proposed language would have substantially revised Arizona Revised Statutes Chapter 36, among other things defining an appraisal as “an opinion of value.”

Does that mean that two neighbors, talking about the price of the house for sale up the street, would be in violation of appraisal law?

What Zillow.com and other AVMs do is so far removed from what an appraiser does that in order to outlaw Zillow, the drafters of the legislation apparently found it necessary to outlaw ordinary free speech altogether.

Importantly, there have been no consumer lawsuits or Board of Appraisal complaints in Arizona against Zillow.com, nor has the Board of Appraisal moved against other consumer-oriented AVMs operating in the state.

A compromise was sought by Rep. Michele Read more

What this state needs is more public ridicule! Arizona House to reconsider Zillow.com-proofed bill on Monday

The news is simple enough: “Representative Stump moved that the House reconsider SB 1291 on Monday, March 30, 2007. Motion passed v/v.” That last little bit says the motion passed on a voice vote.

This again would be the Third Reading. If the amended bill passes by a two-thirds majority, it would have to go back to the State Senate for reconsideration, where it would also have to pass by a two-thirds majority.

Of course, Arizona has always drawn huge guffaws in the monologues of late-night talk show hosts, so we may just want to wait for Leno or Letterman to pick up the story…
< ?php include("Zapraisails.php"); ?>

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Waxed Fruit Hegemony: The Director’s Cut

Okay, here’s the videotape we made of our little escapade this morning. It’s about 21 minutes long, and it’s mostly just the tedium of real life, true video verit&233;.

Cathy does a de facto interview with me about the Reagan amendments, so it ends up being not just painfully dull but also mildly informative.

As is discussed at the end, we got a huge spike in traffic at BloodhoundRealty.com. This resulted in a whole bunch of people filling out our form to get a CMA, presumably thinking that we were Zillow.com.

In consequence, I am HouseValues.com for a day. If you are a real estate licensee working in one of the cities listed below, email me and I will front you the lead. Probably useless, but you never can tell. The price is right, anyway.

  • Greensboro, NC
  • Toronto, OH
  • Staten Island, NY
  • West Bloomfield, MI
  • Staten Island, NY
  • Oconomowoc, WI
  • Woodlawn, VA
  • Germantown, MD
  • Pittsburgh, PA
  • Oswego, IL
  • Greenwood Village, CO
  • Woodland Park, CO
  • Wildwood, MO
  • East Hampton, NY
  • Canton, GA
  • Alexandria, KY
  • Riverside, CA
  • Ojai, CA
  • Riverside, CA
  • Santa Barbara, CA
  • Sherman Oaks, CA
  • Des Moines, IA
  • Grand Rapids, MI
  • Hernando beach, FL
  • East Rockaway, NY
  • Gaylordsville, CT
  • Ft. Tgomas, KY
  • Hidden Hills, CA
  • Cataula, GA
  • Beavercreek, OH
  • Pringle, PA
  • Orlando, FL
  • Shreveport, LA
  • Martinsville, VA
  • Lafayette, LA

They’re continuing to come in. There may be more if they re-run the segment.

And because all true art films should end in a way that leaves you wondering if you really got it, I’ll conclude with a link to the Jewel lyric I quote just before the TV broadcast starts.

Roll the credits…
< ?php include("Zapraisails.php"); ?>

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Waxed Fruit Hegemony: Taking over the world one random media appearance at a time

Appended below is the Fox New Channel footage from this morning. Later today I’ll have our own video verit&233; version of the extravaganza.

I think I’ve said before that this sort of thing is akin to being a piece of waxed fruit in a centerpiece: You’re there not because there is some inherent worth to you or to what you have to say, but, rather, because you fit just right in the overall composition.

I’m not griping. If you want to talk on someone else’s dime, you do it on their terms. But, as will be clear as you watch, I was a totally fungible commodity in this broadcast, the nod who was every bit as good as a wink.

Our tape is more fun, I think, but conversion to iPod format takes time, so you have to wait.

My takeaways, conferred upon me mere moments after the taping was done: “Smile and stare deeply into the camera.”

I’ll do better next time.
< ?php include("Zapraisails.php"); ?>

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Arizona appraisal bill, amended to permit AVMs such as Zillow.com to operate in state, fails to pass

Arizona SB 1291 failed to pass Tuesday afternoon in the Arizona House. The bill would have required a two-thirds majority and passed by less than that. I’ll post further when I know more.

Further notice: Here’s what it all means:

To have passed, the bill would have had to have passed by a two-thirds majority. Then it would have gone back to the Senate, where is also would have had to pass by a two-thirds majority. This is a Constitutional bias in the Arizona legislature against new laws of any sort — generally a good thing.

Since the bill did not pass the House, this means the old version of ARS Chapter 36 is still in effect. It is this version of the law that Zillow.com is alleged to be violating by the Arizona Board of Appraisal.

That allegation has not been tested in court, nor have any of Zillow.com’s direct competitors been alleged to have violated ARS Chapter 36.

As another wrinkle, the amendments made yesterday to AZ SB 1291 that would have clarified that offering the output from an Automated Valuation Model at no cost is not an appraisal, subject to regulatory oversight, could be appended onto another bill. In other words, the existing language of ARS Chapter 36 could be revised to achieve the same effect as yesterday’s amendments.

This is a statement released by Zillow.com this afternoon:

From Lloyd Frink, Zillow co-founder and President:

The issues that Arizona Senate bill 1291 sought to address went far beyond questions about automated valuation models for real estate. The fact is we are still extremely pleased that the Arizona House of Representatives decided to amend SB1291 to recognize the value that sites like Zillow bring to consumers in providing free and easy online access to real estate data and home valuations. We remain confident that any future reviews will similarly recognize the importance that sites like Zillow deliver in creating better informed and educated real estate consumers. Nothing has changed and we will continue to make Arizona Zestimates available for free to all Zillow users.

Additional details RE: AZ Board of Appraisals:

We strongly believe that providing Zestimate home Read more

Me, on TV: Technical assistance needed

Subject to the vagaries of the news business, I will be on Fox News Channel tomorrow morning at 10:20 am EDT, 7:20 am MST/PDT.

The topic: Banning Zillow.com in Arizona, of course.

But: I need technical help. I would love to turn the segment into a video podcast, but I have no idea how to capture televised video. If you do know how, speak up. If you can capture the content and throw it to me by FTP, I’ll make it available tomorrow when I get home.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Zillow.com dodges bullet in Arizona: Amendment would permit consumer-oriented automated valuation models to operate without regulatory oversight

From a press release from the office of Representative Michele Reagan:

Arizona homeowners can still access their “zestimates” with the preliminary approval Monday of a bill that bars the Arizona Board of Appraisal from torpedoing online businesses that provide property value estimates.

An amendment sponsored by Rep. Michele Reagan to SB1291 allows web sites to offer free opinions regarding the value of real estate if it is not an actual appraisal. The bill impacts most notably Zillow.com, which provides free estimates of a property’s value.

“Companies like Zillow.com provide an easy way to get an idea of the value of a home anywhere in the country,” said Reagan, R-Scottsdale. “Government should not put the kibosh on such an informative online tool.”

The Arizona Board of Appraisal sent two cease and desist letters ordering Zillow.com to stop offering its free service in the state. The board is also considering suing the Seattle-based company despite its wide popularity in Arizona and around the nation. In addition, the board asked the Arizona attorney general to prosecute Zillow.com for offering “zestimates.”

“Zillow.com provides a valuable resource for Arizonans and an unelected board’s desire to hamper consumers’ efforts to get as much information as possible makes no sense,” Reagan, chairwoman of the House Commerce Committee, said. “Instead of protecting Arizonans, the Board of Appraisal wants to stifle access to valuable market information.”

The bill received initial approval Monday and is expected to get a vote on the House floor this week. The bill then goes back to the Senate for final consideration.

This is not over yet, but it’s movement in the right direction. If I can lay hands on it, I’ll post the link to the revised bill and highlight the change.

Further notice: The amendments are here: one, two and three. In addition to allowing for consumer-oriented AVMs, Reagan seems to have restored the balance of civilian oversight of the Arizona Board of Appraisal. For comparison: The proposed legislation prior to these amendments.

There are two changes to the language that stand out:

Page 3, between lines 41 and 42, insert:

“9. AN INTERNET WEBSITE THAT GIVES A Read more

KTAR Radio on Arizona’s attempts to stifle Zillow.com

I was interviewed by KTAR Talk Radio in Phoenix today about the State of Arizona’s attempts to shut down Zillow.com. We end up with a 37 second story, which actually turns out to be a fairly decent distillation of the whole story.

< ?php include("Zapraisails.php"); ?>

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Arizona Republic: Realtors side with Zillow.com

The Phoenix RE.net is heard from in a big way in an article that will appear in Sunday’s Arizona Republic about the State of Arizona’s attempts to stifle Zillow.com. Writes reporter Peter Corbett:

A state agency’s efforts to stop Zillow.com from offering property-value estimates in Arizona are drawing criticism from some Realtors who think regulators are overstepping their authority.

The critics also are targeting an Arizona Board of Appraisal reform bill they fear will muzzle anyone from offering an opinion about property values unless he or she is a licensed appraiser, Realtor or attorney.

Phoenix real estate broker Greg Swann said that the legislation, Senate Bill 1291, is narrowly written to block Zillow from offering its estimates.

It also could affect other online services from offering property-value estimates using what are called automated valuation models, he said.

“This is legislation to stop progress,” said Swann, adding that state regulators are being Luddites in trying to halt the advance of Internet commerce.

The Arizona House is expected to consider the bill on Monday, said Deborah Pearson, director of Arizona Board of Appraisal.

The legislation is not aimed at Zillow but rather is intended to update statutes that have not changed since 1991, Pearson said.

Realtor Swann of www.BloodhoundRealty.com, said that the bill is so tightly written that two neighbors talking to each other about a neighbor’s property technically would be in violation of the law.

Pearson said exemptions in the law would permit neighbors to talk about property values.

It may be that she thinks this to be the case, but the language of the legislation is very precise:

“Appraisal” or “real estate appraisal” means any of the following: (A) The act or process of developing an opinion of value. (B) An opinion of value. (C) Pertaining to appraising and related functions such as appraisal practice or appraisal services.

This is very clear. Any opinion of value brought forth by anyone not explicitly exempted by the law would be a violation of that law. To capture Zillow.com and other Automated Valuation Models, they had to write the law so broadly that it effectively outlaws all “unofficial” opinions of value.

Corbett continues:

The controversy about appraisals erupted Read more

Zillow.com notes: Fear and Ludditism, advertising, a better farming strategy and more

Zillow notes: Jay Thompson, The Phoenix Real Estate Guy asks “Why do so many agents fear Zillow?” He makes the same point in a BusinessWeek article on the Seattle-based Realty.bot.

Brian Brady, America’s Most Opinionated Mortgage Broker and a BloodhoundBlog contributor, covers some of the same ground: “Is your Realtor threatened?”

Both gentlemen are objecting to what we might characterize as the opportunistic bandwagoneering going on with respect to the Arizona Board of Appraisal’s attempts to outlaw consumer-oriented Automated Valuation Models. I can’t speak for them, but for me this is a matter of vitally-important principles, liberty the first among them.

I may write more about this over the weekend, because the issues involved are vast and very interesting — at least to me. Earlier this week, in email, I wrote, “When the sabot is a Ferragamo, Ned Ludd has a whole new style.” I have no doubt that this regulatory and legislative initiative is Ludditism in a Brooks Brothers suit. It’s bad enough that Zillow is afflicted, but I expect this is but the first salvo in a long war.

Witness: This came in as a comment last night, but I wanted to highlight it:

MLSPIN of Massachusetts just sent out this notice:

“RULES AND REGULATIONS REMINDERS:

I. Recently, the On-Line Valuation site, Zillow announced a new function being made available to advertise listings for sale on that site, whether or not you are the listing broker/agent. The MLS Rules and Regulations, STRICTLY PROHIBIT the advertising of another broker’s listings without their prior WRITTEN consent. The REALTOR&174; Code of Ethics, Standard of Practice 12-4 also prohibits the advertising of a listing without proper authority. Better safe than sorry; do not advertise another office’s listing anywhere without prior written approval.”

“Better safe than sorry” is an interesting choice of words.

Even more interesting is the fact that MLSPIN is arguing that MLS members have fewer rights to act than ordinary people. As things stand now, any non-MLS member can advertise another party’s home for sale, but, of course, no one does. Why? Advertising costs money. But anyone except MLSPIN members can announce that another party’s home is for sale Read more

Protecting whom? There are no complaining parties in Arizona’s quest to outlaw free consumer-oriented home evaluations

I hear a lot of rumors, as you might guess. They’re usually way less than half the truth, but they can be useful for shaking the real truth loose, so they’re not entirely a bad thing. In any case, I’ve been hearing ugly rumors about Zillow.com in Arizona. Zillow Public Relations Specialist Amanda Hoffman has been working night and day to help me pin them down.

Like this:

  • Q: Is Zillow being sued by Arizona homeowners who regret having used Zestimates as opinions of value? Anywhere else?
    A: “Nope. Not true.”
  • Q: Are there any extant complaints about Zillow before the Arizona Board of Appraisal? In other words, have any real persons claiming standing as victims come forward?
    A: “Not that we know of.”
  • Q: Do you have any comment about Arizona Senate Bill 1291? Has Zillow had any involvement with the debates on this legislation so far?
    A: “We recently learned about the Arizona bill and we’re looking into what it may mean for Zillow users. We believe it’s important for home buyers and sellers to have easy access to real estate data and home valuation tools.”

I’m reading that last response to suggest that they might only have heard about the bill today.

The first two responses are significant because they argue that there are no self-identified injured parties appealing for relief from Zillow.com in Arizona. I don’t think offering an unwelcome opinion of value can be conceived of as a tort, but no one is complaining of an injury in the first place.

< ?php include("Zapraisails.php"); ?>

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Idle chatter of idle neighbors to be outlawed in Arizona: Appraiser’s job protection act passes Arizona State Senate

Little Pink Houses dug up the smoking gun: The State of Arizona is trying to make it illegal for anyone without a state-issued license to express opinions of value about real property. Oh, there is an exception: You will be able to express an opinion about the value of your own property.

This law, if ratified, is only one court case away from being quashed.

< ?php include("Zapraisails.php"); ?>

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Zillow.com at the Dawn of the Age of Abundance: Working for free is not a crime, trying to forbid it is . . .

I read a lot of science fiction when I was a kid (more INTx evidence). One of my favorite books was Voyage From Yesteryear by James Hogan.The plot turned on the conflict between an economy like ours, based on scarcity and hoarding, and a radically different economy based on abundance and sharing. At the time the book was published, the latter economy would have seemed wildly utopian to a lot of people. But there were others who saw the Singularity on the horizon and understood that Hogan’s vision was one way it might play out, in the near term.

By now, of course, Hogan’s ideas don’t seem very radical at all. There are still a great many economic goods stored behind lock and key. But we are seeing more and more goods, especially intellectual values, delivered at no cost, often with no form of “monetization” at all. I wrote about this in my first BloodhoundBlog post and later in a post about disintermediation in the for-pay information business.

The interesting question I asked then is even more interesting now:

How much future is there in a job that millions of very smart people are willing to do for free?

This is a question that Zillow.com’s new Q&A feature asks, and it’s a question that seems to be uppermost in the minds of members of The Arizona Board of Appraisal.

But here’s an angle that may not have occurred to you: When Zillow.com introduces a potential buyer to a Make Me Move seller, it is engaging in the essential act of real estate brokerage. Why isn’t this “illegal,” much as the Board of Appraisal is attempting to claim that Zillow’s Zestimates are “illegal” appraisals?

The answer: Because Zillow is not accepting or anticipating compensation for engaging in real estate brokerage. The Babbitts who wrote the real estate laws did so in the hope of creating a cartel, with correspondingly higher fees, by forbidding non-licensees from listing and selling real estate for compensation.

This is a criminal conspiracy against the consumer, the use of the coercive power of the state — guns and prisons — to forbid consumers and vendors Read more