There’s always something to howl about.

Category: Lending (page 35 of 56)

Why Your FHA Decision Engine Approval Gets Denied

The occurrence of FHA loans receiving an FHA TOTAL Scorecard approval and subsequently having the loan denied once it hits the underwriter’s desk is happening more and more. It’s a reality the field must acknowledge and from what I have seen, the good originators have taken note and have adjusted their game accordingly.

However, before adjusting your game, you must understand the reasoning behind why this is happening and will continue to occur in the future. Quite frankly, it is at this execution juncture point, that the details and actions of originators are what separate the superstars from the rest of the pack.

The Reason

While the technical reason behind this shift has been in place for years, the enforcement has not until recently. In a nutshell, HUD has stepped up their post endorsement technical reviews and NOT letting lenders insure loans they allowed in the past. In short, previously they were letting lenders slide and NOW they are NOT!

HUD has from the beginning made it clear to lenders that regardless of the Automated Underwriting System (AUS) findings, it was still the lenders responsibility to ensure the data input to TOTAL Scorecard was accurate as required per FHA guidelines AND also demonstrate if there are factors that could not be determined, measured or quantified by the TOTAL Scorecard decision that would invalidate the initial approval decision.

An example of such, is multiple and excessive Non-Sufficient-Funds (NFS) on the borrowers bank checking statements. Since FHA TOTAL Scorecard cannot measure nor account for NSF’s in their decision (recommendation), they defer this determination of layered risk analysis to their Direct Endorsement (DE) lenders to establish if unaccounted layers of risk invalidate a TOTAL Scorecard approval/recommendation.

It is important to note a point HUD stresses to lenders on the back-end…the TOTAL Scorecard decision is ONLY a recommendation and it is the responsibility of the DE lender to determine the accuracy of the approve recommendation. Thus, “due diligence” is the ambiguous “standard” DE lenders are being held to in regards to TOTAL Scorecard approvals. What this means to originators, Realtors and builders is the “approval” received from TOTAL Scorecard (Fannie and Read more

Free Mortgages? Nope – but a free book about mortgages!

From now through October 31, 2009, I’m offering a copy of  Straight Talk About Mortgages – the Book available for free!

Why?  Because I want to.   That’s reason enough for me, how about you?

Click here to download your copy:

Straight Talk About Mortgages The Book

I’d like to ask two favors in return for a free copy:

  1. Once you’ve had a chance to read it, let me know what you think of it.   Just send me an e-mail at tvanderwell@straighttalkaboutmortgages.com.
  2. Take a minute, think of someone you know who might be thinking about buying or refinancing their house and send a copy of the book on to them.

Thanks, enjoy!

Tom Vanderwell

Even though much of the current real estate “news” is really just hype, there can still be good reasons for you to be in the market

This from my Arizona Republic real estate column (permanent link):

Get a load of all that great housing news! Median prices are up! Sales volumes are up! The prognosis for the future? Up, up, up!

Here’s a different take: If it looks, walks and talks like hype, it’s probably hype.

Are houses selling well, compared to a year ago? They are — but the federal government is giving first-time home-buyers $8,000 in free money to buy houses right now. If that tax credit is not extended or replaced with something even more generous, the music will stop on November 30th.

And while median home prices may be up, prices for homes that normal working people actually buy are flat at best — and they have been trending downward since December of 2005.

But what about the shortage of available homes you have read about? What about the multiple offer scenarios, with homes selling for thousands of dollars over list price?

What would you expect to happen when you artificially stimulate demand at the same time that you artificially limit supply? We should be doing what your grandpa used to call “a land-office business.” Instead, even with $8,000 in free money, prices are still trending downward.

And that artificially-limited supply — all of the foreclosed homes that banks are withholding from the marketplace — will flood the market sooner or later.

If you’re in the real estate market right now, what you should do depends on your circumstances.

If you’re a seller, make a deal. Your carrying costs will almost certainly exceed any gain you can hope to realize by waiting out the market.

If you’re a first-time home-buyer, jump. If you’re not under contract by October 15th, you’ll probably miss out on the tax credit — and houses are not easy to get, taking account of the artificially-limited supply.

Buying with a loan? Interest rates are low for now, but they may not stay that way.

Buying all cash? Sit tight. As sweet as prices look right now, it seems likely they’ll get a lot sweeter when the banks finally release all the homes they’ve been hoarding.

 
Spread the word: Click here for a Read more

Jobs Report – did I call it wrong?

Okay, so far this morning, the market has reacted in a very volatile but not significantly changed manner to the jobs report.   Essentially the jobs report came in pretty much where the market expected.  

So, did I call it wrong by recommending a shorter term lock and a long term float guideline yesterday?   I don’t think so for a couple of reasons:

  1. We’ve passed the major economic hurdle for the next few weeks without any news that is going to significantly lower rates.   Between that and the fact that the new Reg Z rules essentially require locking in your rate at least 1 1/2 weeks before closing, it makes sense, if you are closing soon, to grab a rate and be done with it.
  2. One of the “big guys” at PIMCO was on CNBC this morning talking about how this is a “sugar high” rally that is based on inventory and cost control and stimulus funding (isn’t that what stimulus is supposed to do?) but that it won’t last.    When reality hits, the stock market will adjust and the adjustment won’t be pretty.    That has two potential options:  1) It would force money into the bond market driving down rates, or 2) It could cause money to jump to cash (remember last fall?) and everything would be really ugly.   So I expect there is still some lower rate potential in the next 60 to 90 days.

Have a good weekend!

Thanks!

Tom Vanderwell

Would Consulting An Expert Produce Superior Results For You?

Preface: The year long retooling of my firm’s infrastructure is now well into its second year, mercifully nearing the finish line. To my great joy, I’ve rediscovered the Old School working definition of what an expert is. They not only know what they’re doing, they know why what they do works — producing, be still my heart, RESULTS. Or, in BawldSpeak, Skinned Cats. Expert recognition hint: Next time you’re talkin’ with somebody you suspect is an expert, pay attention to how many answers they supply to questions you never in a million years woulda known to ask. Then ask yourself in how many disciplines do you count yourself as an expert?

Ah, and there’s the rub.

When I first learned about the Lord’s game, baseball, the Dodgers and Giants had only been in California for a couple years. There was no Chavez Ravine — well, the ravine was there, but not much else. When a player was described as great, we all knew what it meant — he was, um, great. Now? Gimme a break. A shortstop up from the East Toilet Seat, Idaho AAA farm club makes a decent play on a sharply hit grounder two steps to his right and he’s the next Ozzie Smith — ‘What a great play that was!!’ Now, in baseball, as in all elite sports, the concept of greatness has no meaning whatsoever.

It’s like the Hall of Fame. Some of the players spoken of in the same sentence as the HOF are almost insulting to the Hall. It’s the Hall of Fame, not the Hall of the Really, Really Good. Again, the concept of true greatness has been watered down to the quality of prison gruel. Willie Mays was a great player. Is there a center fielder today you’d mention in the same breath as Willie?

The same goes with the concept of experts directly or indirectly related to real estate.

These days the concept of expert is shown no respect. If a guy’s in a room with 30 people and is three chapters ahead of the others in the marketing ‘book’, Read more

Introducing Manny Fae and Merry Fac

Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose“- Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Carr, 1849

Hat tip to Matt Graham and Adam Quinones of Mortgage News Daily

You gotta hand it to the powerful Mortgage Bankers Association of America (MBAA).  What they lack in imagination, they make up for in chutzpah.  The MBAA released its report “Recomendations for Future Government Role in the Core Secondary Mortgage Market“.  This six page report (the other six pages are pictures and such) essentially suggests that the Federal Government charter “Mortgage Credit Guarantor Entities” (MCGE) with a mission to purchase whole loans from originators and issue securities for purchase by investors.

These MCGE’s will be different from the existing GSE’s inasmuch as they:

  • require originators to retain 5% of the risk of the underlying loan values in the form of “set aside” capital
  • will be subject to “strong and effective regulatory oversight”
  • will only guarantee “core” mortgage products (30 and 15 year fixed rate loans)
  • will issue securities with the “explicit” guarantee of the full faith and credit of the United States Treasury rather than the former “implicit” guarantee

The MBAA did recommend that the existing infrastructure of the “outdated” GSEs be used to establish new MCGEs.  It recommends that initially, the number of MCGEs to be established should be…

two or three.

As I’ve said before, I criticize too much.  As a taxpayer, I should be outraged but as a mortgage banker, I’m keeping my mouth shut;

I want to be President of Manny Fae before I retire.

PS:  Read the whole report here.  Pages 5-10 are the meat of the proposal with lots of pretty pictures and footnotes on the other pages.

PPS:  Look for the more powerful National Association of REALTORs (NAR) to offer immediate support for and pledge lobbying efforts  for the establishment of MCGEs

A Pig with Lipstick – The Financial Services Oversight Council

With the push to establish the Financial Services Oversight Council, is President Barack Obama just recycling flawed regulatory measures by reshuffling the current regulatory deck and coining it with fresh “changed” names? From all indications, that is exactly what it appears; or to leverage one of the presidential campaign terms…”it’s a pig with lipstick.”

In March of 2008, President Obama made a campaign speech at the Cooper Union in which he vociferated a need for a “modern regulatory scheme.” In his speech to the black suit and red tie attendees in New York, he stated:

“Old institutions cannot adequately oversee new practices. Old rules may not fit the roads where our economy is leading.”

While most individuals would not disagree with his rather broad and all encompassing generic/comprehensive statement, his actions have in fact been in conflict with what he stated. For example, under his leadership, the Public-Private Investment Program (P-PIP) and Temporary Asset Relief Program (TARP) have been directed and managed under the same regulatory bodies. In addition, the same antiquated or obsolete regulatory apothegms he referenced in his Cooper Union speech have also been extended to non-banking organizations such as Chrysler, GM and AIG.

Whether you fall into the left, middle or right politically, each person must acknowledge Obama’s abnegation to regenerate our regulatory structure, did not come to fruition when he announced his Financial Regulatory Reform Plan. Instead of constructing a fresh regulatory approach and foundation, he simply reconfigured the same regulators, coined new titles and utilized the same rules of regulatory application he had previously disqualified as antiquated in his Cooper Union speech.

As part of the Financial Regulatory Reform Plan, Obama proposes the Treasury Department, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Commission (FDIC) plus four other agencies form what is labeled the Financial Services Oversight Council. The macro intent of The Council is to gather the identified regulatory agencies and have them work cooperatively to identify unsafe financial instruments and organizations systematically at risk. It is also tasked with providing direction to the Federal Reserve to help them identify Tier 1 Financial Holding Companies that Read more

Hey Zillow, hey Trulia, hey SmarterAgent: Here’s what I really want in a smart-phone app…

Not for me — for our lenders

Until lately, lenders and title people never really lived in our world. You could get ’em on the phone all day long — so long as it wasn’t Sunday, so long as it wasn’t 9:30 at night.

That’s changing, thank goodness, especially with lenders.

But: If I need a Loan Status Report (that’s Arizonan for a pre-qual form) at 9:30 on a Sunday night, I need it.

So here’s what I want for one (or more) of y’all to make for lenders:

1. Give them whatever kind of pre-qual calculator they need — with internet access, of course.

2. At the lender’s option, issue the pre-qual information in any extant state association of Realtors form, along with something generic and an auto-generated cover letter.

3. Email as a PDF or send an e-page with a URL to a PDF on your server.

As dumb as these forms are, and as perniciously useless as they sometimes can be, it’s getting to be impossible, in Arizona at least, to submit a contract without one.

So: If you would, please make it easy for lenders to make loan commitments.

Feel free to charge ’em for the app, of course. We all know they’re loaded… 😉

The Fed Translated – and why it isn’t good for interest rates…..

My apologies for taking almost 24 hours after the Fed to get this up.   As I’ve done in the past, I want to go through what the Fed said yesterday and give some insights into what I think it means for the housing and mortgage markets.   You can find the entire FOMC statement at Federal Reserve.gov.    As usual, my comments will be inserted inside the statement and will be in bold and italics.   Here goes:

For immediate release

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in June suggests that economic activity is leveling out. I think it’s important to notice that they didn’t say things are improving, just leveling out.   The Fed never uses any words without a reason. Conditions in financial markets have improved further in recent weeks. Household spending has continued to show signs of stabilizing but remains constrained by ongoing job losses, sluggish income growth, lower housing wealth, and tight credit.  I think that what they mean by household spending is stabilizing is that people have slashed and burned their budgets down to the minimum and aren’t cutting back further.   However, if you look at the Retail Sales Report this morning, it raises a question of whether household spending is stabilizing. Businesses are still cutting back on fixed investment and staffing that’s a nice way of saying jobs are still being lost but are making progress in bringing inventory stocks into better alignment with sales. inventory in better alignment with sales – what that really means is that the jobs that “make things” are still being eliminated. Although economic activity is likely to remain weak for a time a time – that’s a nice way of saying we’re in for a long slow climb back, the Committee continues to anticipate “continues to anticipate” is that sort of like, “Please, please please, I really really want it?” that policy actions to stabilize financial markets and institutions, fiscal and monetary stimulus, and market forces will contribute to a gradual resumption of sustainable economic growth in a context of price stability.  They have had this sentence in there for a Read more

Introducing Tony Gallegos: The Mortgage Cicerone as guide dog

Joining us today is mortgage expert Tony Gallegos. You’ve known him for years as The Mortgage Cicerone. Tony has just left the cloistered confines of corporate lending and struck out on his own. As a secondary benefit of making this move, he promises to tell BloodhoundBlog readers the unvarnished truth about the world of mortgages.

He’s been a friend of BloodhoundBlog for a long time, and he’s personally acquainted with quite a few of the dogs, so I know y’all will have no trouble making him feel welcome.

Should Realtors “Interview” Lenders?

I got what I thought was a very interesting and thoughtful e-mail last week from Jessica Horton, a Realtor down in Georgia, who I’ve gotten to know.   She and I have chatted a bit both online and over the phone about the markets, the dynamics of today’s lending rules and the ins and outs of structuring deals.   Oh, and we are both authors on the Bloodhound Blog.

I’ve taken Jessica’s e-mail and my response and turned them into a post.    I’ve eliminated a few minor conversational tidbits but I’ve left the majority of our e-mail conversation intact.

Why am I reposting this?

For three main reasons:

  1. I’ve been in the mortgage business for 21 years now and I have never seen as challenging of an environment as we have now.   Yeah, we’ve had ups and downs and economic slow times, but a combination of falling property values, rising unemployment and tightening underwriting guidelines have made this the most challenging market I’ve ever been in.
  2. The days of assuming that any lender can get a loan done and that anyone can get a mortgage are over and they aren’t coming back any time soon.
  3. I found it very refreshing that a Realtor is taking a good hard look at who they want to recommend to their clients and not looking at it only from the standpoint of “who’s going to buy me lunch.”

I found it very refreshing that Jessica was talking to a number (I don’t know how many) lenders and was attempting to understand better how they work and what their processes and procedures are for making sure that things go smoothly.    With the HVCC and the new MDIA and the pending changes from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the rate a lender offers will always be important, but their ability to get things done is more important than it has ever been.

Take a few minutes and read through the exchange.   Jessica’s questions are in “normal” print and my answers are in bold and italics.

Tom

Jessica,

See below.   Thanks for giving me this opportunity.

Tom Vanderwell


From: Jessica Wynn Horton [mailto:jessicahorton30292@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 1:58 PM
To: Tom Vanderwell at Straight Read more

Reversing a Trend Or Back To The Future?

If you’re considering a reverse mortgage, get it now. The reverse mortgage market is going to blow up as big as the sub-prime market did.  This time, like last, it’s those “durned borrowers” acting differently than the rockets scientists predicted they would.  In the sub-prime market, it was assumed that people would honor the old paradigm:  mortgage payment, car payment, then consumer credit.  Sub-prime borrowers sacrificed the house payment, in order to keep their credit cards active, and the world turned upside-down.

The reverse mortgage borrower is about to screw things up royally; he’s going to live longer than expected….and like sub-prime, that risk is not priced into the current market.

A reverse mortgage is basically a negative amortization, no-payment required loan.  Actuaries consider the borrower’s life expectancy,  discount a reasonable return on the future loan balance, and loan the borrower whatever is remaining.  When the borrower dies, the loan balance can be paid off so that the heirs can “reclaim” the asset or the house is sold.  The deal goes sour when the now 65-year old lives past his expected death date.   Consider that baby-boomers are the healthiest (and largest)  generation; they could add 4-5 years to that life expectancy.

The loans are still being underwritten as if the oldest baby-boomers were just 56 years old.  Throw in the fact that a tremendous amount of home equity evaporated, since, 2007, and you have a recipe for disaster. While you remember the wreckage an uptick in defaults had, on a levered sub-prime secondary market, imagine how those measly four years could cause the Great Recession of 2030, complete with bailouts.

The warehouse lenders know it, too. Ask reverse mortgage originators why a seemingly healthy market turned ill this year and you’ll hear them blame the liquidity crisis.  Reverse mortgage originators will cry that the sub-prime collapse caused warehouse lenders to adopt a bunker mentality, which is killing a healthy mortgage product.  They’ll tell you that their product has NOTHING to do with sub-prime and they’re correct.  Reverse mortgages and sub-prime loans have only one thing in common;

they were both priced on faulty risk Read more

In search of better, faster, linkier Craigslist Ads

I still get quite a bit of activity from Craigslist ads. I have been using Postlets, because it puts listings a bunch of different places, and adding a bit of html before and after their code with links to the individual property site, my blogs and my real estate site.

Even though Postlets doesn’t put links in the Craigslist ads, I wanted links! So, since I’m lazy about coding and not very fluent in html, I did a draft post in WordPress with the things I wanted to say and link to and put three lines above the Postlets ad with links to the individual property site, my blog and my real estate home page, clicked to have it shown in html and pasted it in above and below the postlets ad. It looks like this. With 20 or so of these running, I get a noticeable bump in google search results and traffic. No problems with being flagged or having the ads yanked.

But, I’m thinking I can do more.

Craigslist is a more time consuming than I would like because the ads expire every week. I want to automate the process where I can create a template that I can prepare quickly, much like the custom page creation for each property can be automated using Engenu.

So, I took the source code for a property page from Engenu and pasted it into a Craigslist ad to see what would happen. I found out right away that only 30,000 characters were allowed in the post description (the place I can paste in html code). Since the file I tried was 11,000 lines of code, I found that limit pretty quickly. I wanted to see what would come up and I at least found how many characters are allowed. 30,000 characters of code is enough that I should be able to do something better.

Then, I finally searched BHB for Craigslist and found Greg’s post on CL from last year. The comment string is pretty important on that post. After reading those, I was ready to experiment with making a new .html template Read more

VA Jumbo Mortgages: Determining The Down Payment

Sean Purcell and I are really figuring VA-guaranteed  jumbo loans.  We’re getting a steady stream of business from high-cost California counties.  One of the common misconceptions is that VA loans are capped at the county loan limit, like FHA and conventional mortgages.  I’m going to walk you through the formula to determine the required down payment and maximum loan amounts for VA jumbo home loans.

STEP ONE:

___Lesser of purchase price or appraised value +

___Add the 100% financing VA funding fee =

___Gross loan amount

STEP TWO:

___ VA county loan limit * (.25) =

___ Veteran’s maximum entitlement * 4 =

___ Maximum VA guaranty (including funding fee)

STEP THREE:

___ Gross loan amount (from step one) * (.25) =

___ Required Guaranty –

___ Veteran’s maximum entitlement (from step 2) =

___ Required down payment

STEP FOUR:

___ Purchase price –

___ Required down payment (from step three) =

___ Base loan amount (before adding funding fee) +

___ Applicable LTV-adjusted VA funding fee =

___ Total loan amount after down payment

Let’s try a $650,000 purchase price in Maricopa County, where the county loan limit is $417,000, for a first-time VA loan user.

STEP ONE:

$650,000 (purchase price) +

$13,975 (2.15% funding fee) =

$663,975 (gross loan amount)

STEP TWO:

$417,000 county loan limit * (.25)=

$104,250 (maximum entitlement) * 4 =

$417,000 (maximum VA guaranty)

STEP THREE:

$663,975 (gross loan amount) * (.25) =

$165,993 (required guaranty) –

$104,250 (maximum entitlement) =

$61,744 (required down payment)

STEP FOUR:

$650,000 (purchase price) –

$61,744 (required down payment) =

$588,256 (base loan amount) +

$8823 (applicable LTV-adjusted funding fee) =

$597,079 (total loan amount after down payment)

Don’t be confused by the entitlement and loan amount; just follow the formula and any VA-approved underwriter will accept your figures.  As you can see, the required down payment, for this example,  is only 9.4%.  I’d probably round it up to an even 10% down payment so that the funding fee would drop to 1.25% instead of 1.5%.  Putting down an extra $3900 saves the veteran $1625 in the funding fee.

Very few jumbo loan programs allow for a down payment of 10% with no mortgage insurance.  This makes the VA-guaranteed jumbo mortgage tough to beat.  The first question you ask for  any loan application should be…

Did you serve ?

It could Read more