There’s always something to howl about.

Category: Casual Friday (page 1 of 25)

Digging into a very graphic love poem to get a handle on active, imagic, metaphorically-rich writing

“Could it be me? Could it be me, baby? Could you be in there, too?”

[This is me in August of 2007, and I am reposting rather than revising it because I am changed since then. I’m writing about storgic love here before I even knew its name, and rhapsodizing verbs before I had gotten around to cataloging them – a task I hope to return to, someday. And if you’ve been following my strange relationship with Thalia, there is a flagrant kiss-blowing incident right here. Even so, I have nothing to add to this argument. If anything, events are avenging me with heart-stopping acceleration – much, much more is the pity. And yet: There is hope: For if you can read this, then you yourself are the savior of the truly human life. –GSS]

 
It’s late and the kids are in bed — do make sure the kids are in bed — and I feel like digging a little deeper into the idea of writing. This is a love poem I wrote ten years ago:

let’s make love like velcro baby
it’s the best thing we can do
you stick to me like strapping tape
i’ll stick to you like glue

i’ll cast my anchor in your harbor baby
thrust my shovel in your earth
cling by claws to your cavern walls
take me test my worth
 
        love’s just a hint baby
        love’s just a scent
        just a sniggling squiggling clue
        could it be me
        could it be me baby
        could you be in there too
 
let’s make love like velcro baby
let’s do it ’til we die
grab me grasp me clutch me clasp me
hook me with your eyes

This is fun, first, simply because it’s such a goofy idea. The word play itself is fun, but, even before that, it’s fun because it’s such a clumsy, clinical premise for a love poem, the polar opposite of the sunsets and silences and solitudes of the sonnets: Let’s make love like velcro, baby.

The poem is built from very simple stuff. English words, not stuffy Latinate polysyllables. Active verbs, along with nouns and adjectives rich in imagic particularity. This is what Conrad was talking about, writing to Read more

Just-enough-cinema at home: The just-enough-real-estate movie.

Just-enough-intimacy for two people who are really bad at it.

There is a trend in American cinema over the past dozen years, a product of divorce-culture, that we call the just-enough-dad movie.

Like this: Single-mom of overmothered beta nerd barely tolerates her teenage son learning masculine frame from her disreputable, curmudgeonly neighbor. The yarn is always a benedy: In Act III, the kid takes leadership of his own life, gets the girl and walks like a man from then on.

The best example I can think of is “Gran Torino” – which is also a just-enough-Jesus movie – but there are a bunch of them out there. Find an aging male lead who photographs well without a shave and you’ve got a third the cast – and all of the funding.

So today I bring you a couple of one-off variations.

First, free with commercials on IMDB, “Did You Hear About the Morgans?”

Note well: This is not a send up. This film is a collection of poor choices glued together with treacle. But it is fun, despite all that, and it measures up as a just-enough-real-estate movie.

What’s wrong? The title is awful – useless as marketing. Sarah Jessica Parker is much too old for the role she plays. And Hugh Grant – who surely comes with his own writers to make his gags consistent and his performances too long – for some reason fails to deliver the patented Hugh Grant huge rant at the end of Act II.

Sam Elliott and Mary Steenburgen are fun, as is everyone in the film who does not live in New York. In that sense, it’s a just-enough-Wyoming movie, too, but there is no reason to believe that Hugh Grant either mastered or could manage any sort of masculine frame, going forward.

As for the real estate, it comes down to two scenes. In the first, Parker’s character blows a showing so badly that I wanted to send her license back to the state on the spot. But in the second, she deftly guides an underfunded seller into boosting his curb appeal, leading to a sale. Score Team Read more

Unchained Melody: “Your sister cried” – but why?

This is brutal and opaque and it kills me in every version of it I hear. This is a movie of the mind, and it is built to make you squirm.

What’s going on? I keep coming back because I can’t quite tell…

I’ll never know how you got into such a mess.
Why do the bridesmaids all have to wear the same dress?

Fred Eaglesmith is the best country songwriter since Townes shambled on. His work will survive because of songs like this one.

Unchained Melody: Stumblin’ onto “The Heart of Saturday Night.”

Cathleen and I went on a great big outing today. Big for the Coronavirus-infested world, anyway: We went to the Home Depot in Laveen – 30 treacherous miles from our home, along a fairly new freeway spur. In other words, duck soup in January but somehow a fairly big deal in September.

But what made it an outing was this stupid pandemic, so we made the most of it. Cathleen wore a dress, for goodness sakes. And it put me in mind of this song – as sappy as Tom Waits ever got, but iso granular, so particular, that I feel like we’re right there.

Unchained Melody: The DISC of “Darling Be Home Soon.”

The original is pure Di, as are the lyrics: Busy musician home briefly imposes ardent deadlines. It’s truly great that way, an abrupt and demanding lust, and the sheer urgency rends fabric. Artie Schroeck did the original arrangements – and he’s there in all the covers.

Joe Cocker takes and remakes the song – just like always – turning it into the Si viscera of wide-open yearning.

Susan Tedeschi delivers the Joe Cocker vocal performance, but it is Derek Trucks who shows us how Cs the love in that lyric can be.

Unchained Melody: “Timing Is Everything” – except so is everything else.

This is Garrett Hedlund, who played Patroclus in Troy, doing one of the gut-wrenching songs from Country Strong – which is free just now on IMBD.

I love the granularity and particularity of the images, but you get to see the song being improved in the movie:

They’re arriving at the lyrics used in the the Garrett Hedlund recording, which are a substantial improvement on the original:

I could cite a number of examples, but the one that stands out is Gwyneth’s turn:

Original: “I remember that day when we first met.”

Country Stronger: “I remember that day when our eyes first met.”

That’s how good poetry gets better, and that kind of focus on mission-critical improvements is how everything gets better.

Unchained Melody: Whose heart is breaking in “Seven Year Ache”…?

I’ve always loved this song, and I finally figured out why: The narrator is actually male – just as the actual narrator of “Angry All The Time” is female. This is not Roseanne bitching out Rodney for his adultery, this is the lamentations of the cheated-on guy.

Big duh, right? Who writes poetry? Why?

Listen for the games of the tempters, referenced repeatedly. Those are men pulling proto-PUA stunts. This is a beta-boy bitching about the sad consequences of marrying a hot-crazy woman.

I recast the lyrics to swap the sexes, and it makes sense to me. My guess is that this was a trunk song – written by Rodney Crowell to some degree of completion much earlier, then pulled out of the trunk later and polished for Roseanne Cash. An argument in support of that contention is the extreme simplicity of the chord structure, Texas Doo Wop.

I would love to see a slow, yearning cover of this by a male country singer. The story hangs together better, IMO, and the pain is more convincing. Built-in market, too, composed of all the people who love the original.

Seven Year Ache (as adapted)

You act like you were just born tonight
Face down in a memory but feeling all right
So who does your past belong to today?
Baby, you don’t say nothing when you’re feeling this way

The boys in the bars try to capture your eye
But you don’t say nothing when they’re telling you lies
You look so careless when they’re shooting that bull
Don’t you know heartaches are heroes when their pockets are full?

You tell me you’re trying to cure a seven-year ache
See what else your old heart can take
The girls say, “When is she gonna give us some room?”
The boys say, “God, I hope she comes back soon”

Everybody’s talking, but you don’t hear a thing
You’re still uptown on your downhill swing
The boulevard’s empty, why don’t you come around?
Baby, what is so great about sleeping downtown?

There’s plenty of dives to be someone you’re not
Just say you’re looking for something you might’ve forgot
Don’t bother calling to say you’re leaving alone
’Cause there’s a fool on every corner when you’re trying to Read more

Unchained Melody: Telling the brutal truth about “Take It Down.”

It has been claimed that John Hiatt wrote this song about cancelling the Confederate flag – but that’s plainly bullshit. This is a brutal divorce song, excruciatingly simple.

It’s amazing, anyway. I play it on the guitar, sometimes for hours, late at night. The lyrics work, and that’s why the song works so well, but the music works – brutally – just by itself.

Here’s a sweeter take from Patty Griffin:

And this is my favorite cover, from The Wailin’ Jennys:

We’ve always talked about music here, but I don’t intend for every Unchained Melody to be a tussle with a lying poet. But it’s amazing that anyone could miss the ugly divorce being dissected here.

Take It Down, by John Hiatt

Take everything that we have
Take it and burn it to the ground
Some things were never meant to last

Take it down, down, down
Take it down
Take it down, down, down
Take it down

I’m still married to it all
That ain’t no place to hang around
My love is 50 feet tall

Take it down, down, down
Take it down
Take it down, down, down
Take it down

I’ve grown accustomed to the way
You hurled us into space
I’ll never make that trip
Tears all rusted on my face
And I’m just an empty place
Where your love used to fit

South Carolina where are you?
We were once lost and now we’re found
The war is over, the battle’s through

Take it down, down, down
Take it down
Take it down, down, down
Take it down

Take it down, down, down
Take it down
Take it down, down, down
Take it down

Unchained Melody: “Sisters of Mercy” – because Leonard Cohen deserves better than this.

So: Leonard Cohen wrote a song called “Hallelujah.” People hear what they want to hear, so they think it’s a religious song, when in fact it is a distant and self-absolving lamentation of a broken relationship. Cohen later rewrote the song as a much sexier despairing of what would seem to be an ongoing divorce. Arousing gonad references in the second act, but no religion. The version of the song you are probably familiar with is a mashup of the two, associated with Jeff Buckley, Rufus Wainwright and many others: A more mature fatalism about all sexual relationships, but still no religion.

So you hear it everywhere as if it were a hymn: Church and funerals, of course, but anywhere people want to be solemn together. (Heads-up, y’all: “If It Be Your Will.”) Just this week, we heard it as a part of the opera performances bookending Donald Trump’s acceptance of the GOP nomination Thursday night.

Opera!

I love Leonard Cohen, and I love every version of that song – especially the juicy ones. But: No religion. And literally for heaven’s sake, please: No opera.

It gets worse.

While Leonard Cohen was an unfailingly kind man – wry and fatalistic but gentle and loving with everyone – the crypt-keepers who presume to speak for him from beyond the grave are made of different stuff.

The Daily Mail:

The estate of Leonard Cohen said on Friday it was considering legal action over the use of the Canadian singer’s ‘Hallelujah’ at the Republican National Convention, calling it a brazen attempt to politicize the song.

First, I’m sure the Trump campaign is on sound legal footing. All of these commercialized artists bitch about the generic-whore contracts they sign with ASCAP/BMI, but they are nevertheless generic whores, open-for-business to all paying customers. If you don’t want your content licensed, don’t license it.

Second, there is no advantage to Leonard Cohen’s cashiers to pissing off half his audience. I see zero upside to these futile displays.

The laid back Tom Petty turns out to be pretty bitchy in death, too, and Neil Young didn’t even have to die to manifest his inner harridan. But it Read more

Unchained Melody: Why deny the obvious in “The Obvious Child”?

I’m sure no one cares but me, but this song has always bugged me – art is the stuff that won’t turn you loose. I can give you a video montage for which a less-raucous rendition could make the soundtrack:

A 4 AM monologue/soliloquy/lullabye sung by a grandfather to his fussing grandson. “The cross is in the ballpark” is repeated in a way that suggests the theme is an attainable redemption, a message aimed most at Sonny, the narrator’s son. The instrumentation crowds the poetry, but I like it as a redemption hymn.

The second repetition of “Why deny the obvious, child?” seems explicitly religious to me:

Some people say the sky is just the sky
But I say, “Why deny the obvious, child?”

That’s proof by assertion, but it seems to argue that the whole song is a mildly-enthusiastic pomo paean to the redemptive power of faith. That much is just fun for me, and I like my reading better than any other I’ve seen.

And that’s just the song. If you take on the back-story that leads to my montage above, there’s a three-act reconciliation rom-com in there, with a sweet sidebar on fatherhood.

What’s the vitally important obvious fact being denied? What broke up Sonny’s marriage? And how do the three men in the song go about fixing it?

I wrote that much in February (you remember – huggy, schmoozy, long-forgotten February) on Facebook. Yesterday, I looked at the original video for this song and guess what I saw? Keep in mind that Paul Simon has said “The cross is in the ballpark” refers to the Pope’s visit to Yankee Stadium.

If you don’t see it, you haven’t been to Mass lately.

I have no dog in this hunt, although I am always interested in the lies poets tell about their work. But there is a sweet story here about how fathers and sons can fix themselves, buried under all that instrumental camouflage.

Here’s a cleaner take. It’s made by Swedes, so you can understand the words.

What’s this song really about? Why deny the obvious?

Unchained Melody: The “Layla” guitar solo from a very confident Derek Trucks – age thirteen.

We talk about this at home all the time: Extraordinarily “talented” people will turn out to have been obsessively devoted to practice at age 13. This can be an emotional shielding – if you’re looking for the very most shunned people, look here – but it’s ultimately just a fact of practical ontology.

What’s most fun about this clip? The way thirteen-year-old Derek Trucks takes a sip of his Coke before taking The Allman Brothers Band to school.

New tricks for an old dog, because there is always something to howl about…

“‘I usually work alone…’”

BloodhoundBlog is renewed and refreshed as of this morning. I’ve deployed a new theme for the first time ever, trimming away every distraction from the ideas that move this place – or that once did and perhaps will again.

What’s the point? Why bother?

I have a number of reasons: The boys have been muttering about it here and there, and I want a place where I can talk about real estate. That much was a problem, since our antiquated theme (installed with version 1.19 of WordPress) had lost its editing power with recent software upgrades.

Even more important is this: We can’t rely on social media. I am at this moment banned from Twitter, for weeks now, for praising Forest Whitaker as an actor. I wish I were making that up. My sad experience with every sort of content-contribution site is that eventually I get thrown off the island, with all of my contributions deleted. To hell with that…

So in with the new, by way of the Hoffman theme. No Odysseus picture for the header, yet, because I’m not sure I’m done. I grew very fond of the block editor on LinkedIn, and I want it with this upgrade – and I have not yet worked out how to get it. We’re working from the “classic” editor for now, which is adequate but not ideal. But we are working, or we are at least fully-functional and ready to work.

If you had posting privileges on BloodhoundBlog, you still do. Log in from this link, and reset your password if necessary. Write what you want. Write what you honestly believe. Above all, write about the ideas that might get you banned or shunned elsewhere. That would be my plan, anyway.

I had BHB stats yesterday, for the first time in years, and this post popped up, to my thinking a choice expression of what BloodhoundBlog does best: Dancing joyously while holding up a mirror to hypocrisy. Don’t even get me started on “Gin and Juice.”

So: Link, promote, subscribe. We can have a conversation away from the censorship of Big Read more

A Scause for applause: South Park rescues you from despair and ennui.

I am ignoring this place, and in this I am clearly not alone. I have other things commanding my attention. If y’all want to talk about real estate, you know what to do.

Meanwhile, with the kind of surgical concision we have learned to expect, South Park takes on the Lance Armstrong modified-limited-hangout brilliantly:

Watch the whole episode. It rocks, I promise.