It would be too easy to pile on the NAR, what with their recent tempests in respective teapots. But here is a hypothetical –
What’s the NAR going to do in this scenario as described at SearchEngineWatch?
Adding more confusion to the case law surrounding trademark issues and search advertising, a Sixth Circuit federal court in Kentucky found that keyword advertising is a “trademark use in commerce” under the Lanham Act.
…
If buying an ad triggered by a trademarked keyword is eventually found to be a trademark use in commerce, that would essentially prevent advertisers from doing so legally. Goldman has written quite extensively about online trademark law, and he agrees with the Second Circuit courts.The Lanham Act defines “use in commerce” as using a trademark on physical packaging or displays, or “in the sale and advertising of services,” an ambiguous definition when it comes to the Internet and search engine marketing, says Goldman. He expects the matter to remain unresolved until Congress passes a new law or the Supreme Court makes a ruling.
Google’s current trademark policy allows advertisers in the U.S. and Canada to trigger an ad from another party’s trademarked keyword, but not to use the trademarked term in the ad text. In all other countries, advertisers are not allowed to do either.
If a Realtor advertises with Google for “Charlottesville Realtor,” or “Phoenix Realtor” would they be met with a Cease and Desist from NAR? While “Realtor” is trademarked, wouldn’t Realtors benefit more by having the word officially enter the vernacular akin to Doctor, Lawyer, Mechanic?