Prologue: My initial post on this subject, was widely read, and seemed to generate responses on one side or the other, not many in the middle. That makes sense. One commenter came at me full throttle, remaining civil, detailing why, a hyper-local farm not only wouldn’t work, but wouldn’t be any more productive than what he’s doing now, offline.
We both, no doubt, think the other is partaking of herbs not meant for cooking. π In short, I think he’s a good guy, harboring an honest difference of opinion. The following is how we have disagreed.
I think I’d really like Spencer Barron. In fact, judging by our give and take in the comments of my most recent post, I like him and respect him. We have respectfully disagreed on the concept of the hyper-local farm site, but it’s been fun. He’s obviously a pretty smart guy.
Can you feel the butter, Spencer? π
Spenser — The next time I’m in Denver, I’m buying. We gotta meet, cuz it’s always fun to talk with guys who disagree with me so much, yet so well, and stay so wrong. π
Your VW just passed me? To extend the metaphor, you’re driving a VW because your approach can’t generate enough money to acquire a Ferrari. π
Let’s count the ways you are, in my view, not only dead wrong, but worse, basing your thinking on absolutely false premises — a mistake that almost always proves fatal.
You said — Since you will be continuously marketing them to go to your blog, why donβt you just tell them why they should use you. You could try to appeal directly to the people your trying to reach, home sellers. Why all the coy games?
False Premise #1 — Wait a minute, let me write that one down. π You mean, I should actually tell them why I’m the best agent for them? Well I’ll be dogged.
I’ll be continuously marketing them to go to my blog. All that will be done in the infancy of the site (blog? website? hybrid? who cares?) because that’s what’ll make it go. Read more