Over the last couple of months we have spoken to hundreds of agents who when asked, most can not easily articulate what they do in a transaction. Yet worse, justifying why they receive 6% commission on the transaction is even harder to define.
More often than not their answers have been based upon mantra-like rhetoric that centers around the ignorance of the consumer. One of my favorites, “I don’t get paid for what I do, I get paid for what I know” is representative of the kind of inanity surrounding an industry whose players for the most part are reluctant to provide great detail into what they do.
In this Web 2.0 world, many who are resistant to a culture of transparency and fear disintermediation believe they are beyond reproach and that the technologically savvy consumer could never do without a Realtor’s involvement in a transaction. The misguided belief that “there will always be a need” for a Realtor is ignorant at best.
While true, there may be quite a great number of consumers who DESIRE to have an agent involved in a transaction, much more for convenience sake then anything else, it is big mistake to think that they are NEEDED in a transaction.
The former implies that an agent’s services are thought of by some to be much like that of a “real estate concierge”,while the latter implies some form of prerequisite dependence. This article is written to dispel the rumor that an agent is needed in a transaction.
So from start to finish I will outline a recently closed transaction.
1. Property Selection: A property was found online through tax records as being owned by a bank. The bank had not as of the time of contact contacted or retained an agent. The bank was contacted and the decision maker at the bank communicated their willingness to receive an offer.
2. Due Diligence: Data was reviewed and it was concluded that this would be a great buy. All of the vital signs were reviewed online and required about 2 hours of time. It only took this long because it was located in another state that Read more