For those who want the Campbell’s Soup version of this post:
Not Really. It actually makes keyword research a little EASIER. π
For those inquiring minds who want to know why I am saying that, here’s my take. Google Instant does one thing and does it pretty well. As a person enters in a keyword phrase into Google, it suggests possible phrases based on the most common searches that have been done to date AND it shows the relevant results for that search on the fly. Here’s a screen shot or two of what I am talking about.
and then this one:
Okayfine. Let’s look at the finer details. I asked more than a few people to go to a search engine and start looking for a home in the Louisville area. Here are some things that I found out that they typically do. Mind you, I told these folks IN ADVANCE that Google had made a change and was suggesting phrases (and providing results) as they typed them in…
The results? The main behavior difference among them was that they would stop after a WORD and look to see what Google had suggested. NOT after a letter. That makes sense to me. So when someone starts typing “Louisville r “into the search bar in pursuit of Louisville real estate, they see Louisville Riverbats (our AAA team). When they type in the complete word Louisville real, it shows them the search results (and they REMARKABLY similar to Louisville Real Estates’ results)
So this would tend to suggest the effect that Chris Johnson indicated in his comment on John’s post…heading for shorter, more expensive KWs for those doing PPC. For those optimizing their site this is WAY too micro of a thing to worry about. The one percent of folks that truncate their search isn’t going to make or break more than a few clicks at most and CERTAINLY nothing in my opinion to sweat.
Let the dogs bark, the caravan moves on.
Another observation leading to this conclusion. Try typing in your city followed by homes. IF you hit the space bar AFTER homes, you will likely see the suggestion of city homes for sale. If you you do not hit the space bar, the wizards at G! realize that you are likely satisfied with the search and are preparing to hit ENTER and get their famously relevant results…so they provide them to you without the click. Nice for the user.
And I could not agree with John Rowles’ assessment of the technology more…it is impressive. REALLY impressive.
Now for using this for a little quick longtail KW phrase research. (I mentioned that it makes this easier, correct?) I have been spending a LOT of time looking at subdivision level traffic on search recently (more on that later). Check this out:
Lake Forest is a subdivision in Louisville. (also there are others in Illinois, Texas and Florida, if memory serves, so the person who indicated in the post that the results are geo-targeted gets a gold star ;-). They are right IMO.) Want a quick way to see which phrases to include in the titles of your blog posts?
Enter the subdivision name and your should see several likely ways to title your post. Happy hunting! (grin)
And for those who think this is the end of the SEO world and almost wetting themselves…put your big boy pants on and adapt. When Google does something for the user that helps maintain Google’s traffic levels for everyone who optimizes sites. Search Engine Marketing pros are the LAST people who should be sniveling about this.
They are in the adapting business not in the whining business. To quote Tom Hanks “There’s no crying in Search Engine Marketing!” (grin) Just my thoughts.
jay seville says:
thanks so much for the input eric many of us really appreciate it.
dictated to android
September 11, 2010 — 8:03 am
Eric Hempler says:
Just had an aha moment. Time to see what keywords I should be changing.
September 11, 2010 — 9:42 am
Brad Coy says:
Thanks for breaking it down, Eric. You hit some points that immediately came to me when I first started to play around with it… but it’s nice to hear from an authority on the subject.
Bonus points on the KW breakdown π
September 11, 2010 — 11:37 am
Eric Blackwell says:
@Brad – Bonus points are a good thing! (grin) I think the more interesting developing story is going to be which tools of Yahoo’s will actually be kept by Bing and which will be kept kindasorta and which will go all together…
Lots of speculation on that one as well, but not many final answers. Will post on that once the smoke clears and we get to facts.
Like most things, each change = opportunity if we adapt to it. π
September 11, 2010 — 6:14 pm
Bob Crain says:
Eric,
As someone who doesn’t spell all that great I can see one potential dis-advantage… Misspelled keywords. In fact, back in the good old days some SEO people would even optimize for the common misspellings if they generated a lot of hits…
I like the tips on using this to title our post!
Thanks,
Bob
September 11, 2010 — 8:41 pm
Robert Worthington says:
Always nice to read a post from the Ace himself!
September 13, 2010 — 5:56 pm
Jose Lopez says:
HI Eric, this is the new topic now a days. Google sneezes and we all go running for cover. I think this is good, because it will make us all be a little more focused on our results. Its funny that larger brokerages are finally seeing the light and focusing more efforts on their seo here in Florida. But this is an arena that they can not trully take over, it is just too broad. Let’s see what happens with Bing.
September 15, 2010 — 6:28 am