Earlier, there was a discussion of the possibility of a government takeover of real estate brokerages. We had a bit of a lively discussion about the possibility of a governmental takeover of real estate brokerages. But I’m here to tell you, it will never happen because in the end, the government will have no need for brokerages.
The government takeover of all real estate is already pretty far along. Growth management, shorelines management, local municipalities, county, state and federal regulations have all taken unprecedented freedoms from landowners and redistributed them to government in the name of the “public.” Many cities’ zoning codes are in the process of not only defining what uses to allow for land in their jurisdictions but they are implementing design standards that strictly control how such structures must look. In the county that I live, government already owns 88% of all the land and that percentage is increasing.
Oppressive property taxes in many areas are themselves rent on the land from the government who believes itself to be the true owner. Don’t pay those taxes and you quickly find out who really owns the land. Generally based on assessed valuation, property taxes in periods of increasing value are a tax on an unrealized gain to the property title holder who is then taxed on the gain, as both a capital gain and an excise tax, when it is realized.
You may remember a Supreme Court ruling in Kelo vs. City of New London in 2005 that greatly expanded eminent domain to include seizure of privately owned property for redevelopment and resale to other, more politically favored, private owners or developers! Since that ruling governments can, and have, taken private lands for any reason, including simply selling them to preferred private owners.
The drumbeat continues. The new Secretary of Housing and Urban Development is using Fair Housing laws as justification for new requirements he is placing on cities and developments to provide diversity of housing to obtain a “fully integrated society.” “New Urbanism” and “Smart Growth” are simply terms for the latest planning fads of social engineering under the guise of “public” planning. They purport to know how better to arrange a property owner’s options on how they use their property than their owners would themselves. In the name of affordability, limiting sprawl and reducing carbon emissions they increase property prices, create sprawl and increase carbon emissions.
We have housing authorities that are quasi governmental bodies who live off state and local taxes and funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development that simply take tax money taken from some people and dole it out as rent payments or as subsidized housing to others, while skimming the cookies for themselves.
Do not be surprised there are those amongst us those who claim that housing is health care and should be a “right” provided by government as well. Housing is just a bit larger slice of personal expenditures than health care and the two are inseparable in the eyes of many. Housing expenses have risen even faster than health care expenses so don’t they cry out just as fundamentally for government intervention as health care? Never mind that government policies, just as in health care, are the major cause of the rise in housing expenses.
Just as the government declared war on the SUV and business jet, the McMansion will be villainized to create class envy and get empathy for a government takeover. It does not matter if people have uses for and desire a certain type of home. Of course, we know the government still speeds the ruling elite around in Suburbans and flies them about in government business jets! What is good for the populace is never the same as what is “deserved” by the czars who arrange the lives of the peasant class. What the government takeover of real estate would eventually mean for most is welcome to the projects.
If you don’t believe the “ruling class” is already taking advantage of the rest, consider that their pay is nearly double the private sector. Don’t fear, there will still be the White House for the President and, of course, there will be mansions for governors and housing fitting for the station for the ruling elite bureaucrats. In the name of historic preservation, posh homes and those McMansions will be assigned to other important members of the directorate. Those who write the rules will not need to abide by them, only the unwashed masses, you and I, would have to follow them.
So, you need not fear the government takeover of real estate brokerages, since the final government real estate reform has no need for brokerages. The thing to fear is what is already happening every day in both my neighborhood and yours as our property rights are peeled away by each group of citizens wishing to take something away from the others. Remember the end game when you celebrate the tax credits for home buyers and lobby for more. Once the government controls your access to medical care and access to your home, won’t government pretty much control you?
Mark Brian says:
Some people may dispute this as tin foil hat conspiracy type stuff, but it is disturbing the trends in the government and the policies it wants to enact or already has.
September 5, 2009 — 9:06 am
Greg Dallaire says:
Interesting take on the real estate industry and what is already starting to happen. It doesn’t take a political scientiest to figure out what’s going on with our government these days. To say that they totally over stepped there bounds doesn’t even touch whats going on.
From my point of view the government use’s class warfare as a means to sell the idea and the non sense of these entitlement pograms.
What happened to America this was the place that everyone looked to as a place where you could better yourself and the sky was the limit. People immigrated to America because they knew they had opportunity to better themselves.
Now if your successful there going to pin you as the bad guy so they can have the focus on succesful people instead of the theives in office.
September 5, 2009 — 10:30 am
Greg Swann says:
Wow… This wins my vote for best BloodhoundBlog post ever. A total tour de force.
When you put it all together, it’s pretty scary.
And: Where is the NAR on all this? Almost always on the side of the expropriation of property rights, of course.
September 5, 2009 — 11:54 am
Brian Brady says:
“Wow… This wins my vote for best BloodhoundBlog post ever”
Ditto. I’m so glad you’re here, Al. The links make the article superb.
“The new Secretary of Housing and Urban Development is using Fair Housing laws as justification for new requirements he is placing on cities and developments to provide diversity of housing to obtain a “fully integrated society.””
Wanna bet they don’t try this in Chappaqua?
http://www.zillow.com/howto/FamousPresidentsHomes.htm
The NIMBY approach to zoning is truly comical. In Southern California, you buy a small house in a sleepy beach town (using a CRA loan), run for mayor (while working at the post office), restrict new construction permits, appropriate all vacant land for public parks and schools, tax the hell out of the folks doing tear-downs, sell that house on an upswing, and retire to the desert (and bitch about the fact that you have to pay school taxes).
September 5, 2009 — 12:51 pm
Doug Quance says:
Way to go, Al.
Some believe I’m wearing one of those tin foil hats – but you have done a great job at connecting those dots.
Of course, in the long run – you’re right. My idea of the government taking over the brokerages was the real estate equivalent of the “public option”.
There’s an old Arab proverb:
“If the camel once gets his nose in the tent, his body will soon follow.”
The government is quite the proverbial camel.
September 5, 2009 — 2:38 pm
Teri Lussier says:
Bravo, Al!
September 5, 2009 — 3:47 pm
Joe says:
Socialism. We continue plodding towards government control, while third world countries are plodding towards capitalism. Soon enough there will be two classes of people in United States,- the lower class (us), and the upper class (politicians).
September 5, 2009 — 4:33 pm
Missy Caulk says:
Excellent post, Atlas Shrugged.
September 5, 2009 — 4:53 pm
Thomas Johnson says:
Great article, Al. Houston, TX is hanging on to private property rights by a thread. In spite of the efforts of the social rotarians, we still have no zoning in the soon to be 3rd largest city in the USA.
September 6, 2009 — 6:55 am
Al Lorenz says:
Wow, thanks for the encouraging comments. As a developer, I end up at lots of local meetings over land use. It is simply not worth it in the current environment. I plan to only finish the projects I have and do no more. All the fun is gone from that process.
Thomas,
I spent many of my formative years in the Seabrook area south of Houston. No zoning sounds wonderful from the perspective of the intense “Growth Management” we have in Washington state.
September 6, 2009 — 8:30 am
Jessica Horton says:
Al:
You nailed it, but people have started accepting intrusive behavior in ALL AREAS of their daily lives. Right is called wrong and wrong is called right. A complete reversal of norms and standards as we sink deeper in the quicksand of socialism.
Thomas:
That doesn’t surprise me. I know a few people from the Houston/Katy area and they have such a fantastic grasp of establishment. It’s a rare thing…
September 7, 2009 — 4:41 pm
Lisa Udy says:
Holy crap, what an astounding read. You scared the crap out of me, but it’s all true. I especially enjoyed all the links, I am going to spread this article, and I hope you get some recognition for it. 🙂
September 8, 2009 — 10:54 am
don says:
The government is gracious enough to allow us to rent our properties from them in exchange for a soon to be escalating tax increase. Interesting perspective, everyone becomes a renter from their local governence so long as they keep current with taxes they are alloed to stay.
September 10, 2009 — 6:57 pm