I’ve been a freelancer, mostly, since November of 2007. (I closed about 4mm in loans in 2008, mostly 1st quarter). I’ve built websites, blogs, I’ve set up CRMS, and I’ve created landing pages, and sold a variety of e-books. I created an ill fated subscription service, (got it up to 30 members, then remembered the things I hate about loan officers) and I’ve built a ton of websites, done a ton of writing, and had an utter blast. I’ve delivered sometimes, f’d it up sometimes, and learned more faster than I ever have at any period of my life.
One of the things I learned…and that Dan Kennedy would freak out about is that lowering your prices means more profit, more relaxation, and better, happier clients with a chance to succeed. I used to charge people about $2,000 per blog. And I’d do a reasonable job with the blogs. I’d spend time training people in what WordPress does, I’d train them in how to post, I’d share my analytics with them, and I’d go through it. But for $2,000, you gotta have value. So people would continue to call. The service I offered wasn’t worth $2,000 to them, they felt like something MORE was needed. And honestly, they were right.
I had more time sunk into support and followup than the stuff that I was charging for. So, I thought some more about it.
And decided to lower all of my prices on everything I do. Because if you’re only charging $700 or $800 it’s a far different situation than $2,000. People can afford it, and it’s easier to meet that expectation. They have a level of indifference about the outcome because, honestly, $700 bucks isn’t going to make or break most months for most people. You can increase value by adding more information (videos etc) and it’s a BONUS and not an ENTITLEMENT.
To do that, though, ya need a defined process. The blue ocean thing: everyone was using the Thesis framework for blogs, why not make ’em look cool? I mean really cool? Take away the option from the customer, sell a product, not a service, and streamline EVERYTHING to the essence. The plugins I use (thanks to Eric, Keith & Alec), the way a blog will be, and the theme. It’s better than undefined hourly work, it’s better than having people feel like they are entitled to their pound of flesh.
And–it’s easier to sell when you know what you’re offering and what you’re not.
Making things into ‘products’ makes the “Help-u-Fail” model seem more appealing. You have a defined set of services, offered cheerfully on a “Take it or leave it” basis, and nobody is anxious when things aren’t perfect. The services aren’t for everyone, but they are nothing to be contemptuous of as long as they are honestly marketed, honestly delivered, and honestly sold. I can afford to refund the money and get people out of my hair, and they can afford to say no. Nothing is unclear, and nothing is left undefined. You still have to be competent and excellent. You still have to make sure that you do what you say. I treat everything I do as a product now, a set of defined things that don’t leave room for ambiguity. My customers are getting happier and happier about things.
Mortgage brokers can charge a set fee regardless of loan amount.
Realtors can likewise charge a-la-carte (and upfront) for their services…if that is the direction they wanna go in.
But–by not pushing people to the wall–prrice wise…by deliberately leaving money on the table, you have less tension than you would otherwise. You have less potential for sour grapes. You are leaving money on the table, selfishly so as not to create problems later. You don’t want to sell beer at champagne prices–people will buy beer, know they’re buying beer and be happy to drink beer if that’s what they expected.
John Kalinowski says:
Chris, I’ve found that this doesn’t particularly hold true in a typical real estate transaction. I’ve offered both ends of the scale regarding commission, and from my experience sellers tend to have the same expectations regardless of what you charge. The problem at the low end is you have to do substantially more volume to make up the difference, but you still do about the same amount of work because of what’s inherently involved to close a real estate transaction. With today’s system, you also can’t get around the reality of having to pay the co-broke to the selling agent, which holds the rates at a certain level (the major thorn in Gregg Swann’s side).
I used to argue with people who would say “why not charge a higher rate, one that’s fair for what you do, and work with less people”, but now I’m starting to agree. In a tough market like we’re in now, people aren’t as concerned with the commission rate as they are with actually getting their home sold. A low rate means nothing if the home takes an extra 9 months to sell, or never sells at all.
Real estate sellers tend to expect champagne results, no matter what the price, so why not give them champagne and charge appropriately?
April 14, 2009 — 11:42 am
Chris Johnson says:
Yeah, I guess if preset expectations exist, that might be a problem. Really give champagne and don’t shy away. Homesellers in a declining market. UGH.
April 14, 2009 — 12:22 pm
Kevin Sandridge says:
Chris – Great post – especially for blog helpers! I find myself getting in pretty deep with folks sometimes on Blogging stuff – just because I like to share.
Perhaps I’ll follow your model one day. Seems to work!
April 14, 2009 — 12:42 pm
James Boyer says:
I have yet to see the “Help-u-Fail” model as you put it work very well in Real Estate. In an average or better market the sellers seem to think they need fewer services than reality dictates, and they tend to vastly over price and under market their homes. Even in the wild market of 2004 I was noticing that the local Help-u-Sell franchise was having 80+ % of their listings expire without selling.
Of course the Help-u-Sell franchise loved that, because they could charge more fees to get the “suckers” homes re-listed again.
April 14, 2009 — 3:35 pm
Brian Brady says:
“Mortgage brokers can charge a set fee regardless of loan amount.”
Tried that…twice. I stopped fighting and started playing the game and THAT has made all the difference.
April 14, 2009 — 4:17 pm
Sean Purcell says:
Interesting post Chris. Makes me wonder though: you are a Master Champagne maker. I understand that if you begin to peddle beer at a third the price you’ll have an easier time with less expectant clients… but you’ve left your gift behind.
I would still go the Dan Kennedy route. When you were putting on the whole show and your clients expected too much, what would have been a fair value to you? Raise your price! Charge three times what you used to and cut your clients by half (the math works, I checked 🙂 )
In the end, I don’t know your business like you do, but I always hate to see someone put a big, fat lampshade over their light just to keep the bats happy.
April 15, 2009 — 3:33 pm
Genuine Chirs Johnson says:
Dude, I’m not. I’m making things into ‘products’ less cusotmized, faster deliveries.
April 16, 2009 — 8:40 am