They’d wake up and catch a clue, that’s what. From the Wall Street Journal:
It is simply wrong for commentators to continue to focus on President Barack Obama’s high levels of popularity, and to conclude that these are indicative of high levels of public confidence in the work of his administration. Indeed, a detailed look at recent survey data shows that the opposite is most likely true. The American people are coming to express increasingly significant doubts about his initiatives, and most likely support a different agenda and different policies from those that the Obama administration has advanced.
Polling data show that Mr. Obama’s approval rating is dropping and is below where George W. Bush was in an analogous period in 2001. Rasmussen Reports data shows that Mr. Obama’s net presidential approval rating — which is calculated by subtracting the number who strongly disapprove from the number who strongly approve — is just six, his lowest rating to date.
Overall, Rasmussen Reports shows a 56%-43% approval, with a third strongly disapproving of the president’s performance. This is a substantial degree of polarization so early in the administration. Mr. Obama has lost virtually all of his Republican support and a good part of his Independent support, and the trend is decidedly negative.
A detailed examination of presidential popularity after 50 days on the job similarly demonstrates a substantial drop in presidential approval relative to other elected presidents in the 20th and 21st centuries. The reason for this decline most likely has to do with doubts about the administration’s policies and their impact on peoples’ lives.
There is also a clear sense in the polling that taxes will increase for all Americans because of the stimulus, notwithstanding what the president has said about taxes going down for 95% of Americans. Close to three-quarters expect that government spending will grow under this administration.
Recent Gallup data echo these concerns. That polling shows that there are deep-seated, underlying economic concerns. Eighty-three percent say they are worried that the steps Mr. Obama is taking to fix the economy may not work and the economy will get worse. Eighty-two percent say they are worried about the amount of money being added to the deficit. Seventy-eight percent are worried about inflation growing, and 69% say they are worried about the increasing role of the government in the U.S. economy.
The rallying cry around my desk is “Lame duck by Q2!” Obama is resignation- and assassination-proof, given that Biden is an even worse idiot — and now we understand why he was chosen, don’t we? But we can’t wait for the mid-term elections to neutralize this disaster of a president.
I’m not a Republican. I’m not a Democrat. I want no government, by which I mean enormously less than you ever imagined possible. But it is not fitting for me to chortle about this incredible cluster-frolic. I’m screwed, too, after all. Even so, the American people asked a question — “What could be worse than Bush?” — and now they know the answer.
Kim Hannemann says:
It never ceases to amaze me that some people can be so brilliant, yet so frustratingly blinded by prejudice (no necessarily racism, BTW) at the same time. And I am not speaking of President Obama.
March 13, 2009 — 11:52 am
Greg Swann says:
> It never ceases to amaze me that some people can be so brilliant, yet so frustratingly blinded by prejudice (no necessarily racism, BTW) at the same time. And I am not speaking of President Obama.
You’ve lost me then. Are you speaking of yourself? It is by now very clear that Obama is not just a deluded ideologue but is in fact well beyond incompetent for the job he holds. Is this something you wish to dispute?
March 13, 2009 — 11:58 am
Doug Quance says:
Obama is a puppet of the powers who helped groom him for the office.
He can’t even hold a press conference without his teleprompter pacifier to suck on.
While he might be brilliant – the direction he and his comrades in Congress are taking this country is beyond disastrous. Those ideas have not worked anywhere else… and I don’t see any reason why they would work, here.
Can anyone say Bilderberg Group?
March 13, 2009 — 12:03 pm
Jessica Horton says:
“It never ceases to amaze me that some people can be so brilliant, yet so frustratingly blinded by prejudice (no necessarily racism, BTW) at the same time. And I am not speaking of President Obama.”
No, you just have to be from the South and disagree then you get to wear that shoe.
March 13, 2009 — 12:26 pm
Thomas Hall says:
How is it that Obama shoulders the blame? So called Conservative “values” derailed this train over the past 8 years.
Perhaps the irony is – idealogical positions are simply that – positions – like the “bend over and take this” position we’ve all assumed lately.
I too am neither a Democrat nor Rebuplican, however, it seems reality always trumps ideology – or as they say, it’s all fun and games until someone loses an eye – I have lost both of mine over the past 6 months. I am damn near personal bankruptcy, having lost a retail business – in business for 15 years with 4 locations, laid off employees who have become family, completely depleted my savings and have worked feverishly to get deals done, only to have things fall apart which are beyond my control.
I believe in personal responsibility and working hard – those who work hard should be rewarded. But again, reality trumps ideology – even those who work hard and play by the rules fall prey to economic circumstances – and guess what, life simply ain’t fair. But I don’t believe the answer is to simply let it happen.
Is anyone else the least bit sickened by the fact that there are people living in tents in this country who have fallen victim to this climate, yet we spend billions building schools and hospitals elsewhere? Just at the surface – it pisses me off.
Sticking to ideology when you’re not bleeding to death is easy – try is when your limbs are severed and there’s more blood on the ground than in your own body. Amazing how perspectives change, eh?
The system is broken – has been for some time. We’ve waited 8 years (probably more like 3 decades) to get to this point, I suggest 50 days is a bit too short a period of time to decide whether or not it’s time to throw in the towel.
March 13, 2009 — 12:27 pm
Greg Swann says:
> The system is broken – has been for some time. We’ve waited 8 years (probably more like 3 decades) to get to this point, I suggest 50 days is a bit too short a period of time to decide whether or not it’s time to throw in the towel.
Tom, I’m sorry for your circumstances, but “the system is broken” because it is a Kleptocracy. The solution to the disasters occasioned by systemic crime is not more crime. But that’s as may be. Obama is not simply a Kleptocrat, he is a Kleptocrat far more incompetent than any we’ve seen lately, more incompetent, even, than the spectacularly inept Jimmy Carter. My entire observation in this post is that Americans are turning on Obama, which offers some hope that we won’t have to endure two full years of damage. It would be wonderful if the American people were to wake up to the idea that crime does not pay, but I’m not holding my breath.
March 13, 2009 — 12:42 pm
Doug Quance says:
You can’t borrow and spend your way out of this mess.
If that was possible – Europe would be a juggernaut.
March 13, 2009 — 12:32 pm
Doug Quance says:
If you have a couple of hours, this is a pretty good conspiracy video to watch. It’s called “The Obama Deception”. Be sure to bring your popcorn.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7886780711843120756&hl=en
March 13, 2009 — 12:46 pm
Thomas Hall says:
Greg – appreciate your kind words, thanks 🙂 I suggest we’re more like a plutocracy rather than a kleptocracy – issue is the government has merely acted as the agent. But that’s the wild-ass, far left of center liberal in me.
Before throwing stones, I did not say I was a Democrat – I did proudly admit to being a wild-ass, far left of center liberal.
March 13, 2009 — 12:55 pm
James Boyer says:
OK Greg, you put me in mind of the Republicans openly stating they hope Obama fails. I know you say you are not a Republican or a Democrat but your sounding very Republican.
The way the Republicans are setting themselves up, I would guess they would be heading for a midterm disaster.
March 13, 2009 — 4:49 pm
Louis Cammarosano says:
Obama’s only qualification to be president was that he was not george bush.
March 13, 2009 — 7:40 pm
susan kelly says:
Oh..now I get it, we’ve gone from an Oligarchy to a Kleptocracy!
Wow..thanks; it’s really great to hear things are looking up!
March 14, 2009 — 5:22 am
Kim Hannemann says:
“It is by now very clear that Obama is not just a deluded ideologue but is in fact well beyond incompetent for the job he holds. Is this something you wish to dispute?”
Absolutely, I dispute it. I dispute virtually everything I have ever seen you write about politics or policies, economic or otherwise.
I would, however, hire you to sell my house.
March 14, 2009 — 8:29 am
Greg Swann says:
> I dispute virtually everything I have ever seen you write about politics or policies, economic or otherwise.
> I would, however, hire you to sell my house.
Fantastic! You made my day. I’m going to print that out and post it on my wall.
March 14, 2009 — 8:40 am
Sean Purcell says:
Close to three-quarters expect that government spending will grow under this administration
WHAT?? Does that mean that 25% of the people in this great nation believe spending will shrink? That can not be accurate. The President himself has described the stimulus bill as a “spending bill” and proudly announced a budget that sets records for its total expenditures. Twenty-five Percent?!?! Good God, are we sure voter qualification tests are a bad idea…
March 14, 2009 — 10:46 pm
Teri Lussier says:
>I’m not a Republican. I’m not a Democrat. I want no government, by which I mean enormously less than you ever imagined possible.
That’s exquisite, Greg. I’ve never seen that put so well.
March 15, 2009 — 8:42 am
Kim Hannemann says:
>> I dispute virtually everything I have ever seen you write about politics or policies, economic or otherwise.
>> I would, however, hire you to sell my house.
>Fantastic! You made my day. I’m going to print that out and post it on my wall.
You’re welcome. You deserve it. You will also note that I don’t miss a thing you write, and I try to use some of your . . . ahem . . . unique ideas.
March 15, 2009 — 11:32 am