The Week We Woke Up
I’m going to deviate from the normal format this week, because I believe that this week has deviated from the normal that we’ve been experiencing lately. I’m calling it the Week We Woke Up.
What did we wake up to? A couple of things:
- The fact that the debate on whether we’re going to have to nationalize some of the banks/financial institutions is pretty much a debate over semantics. The announcement that the government now owns 36% of Citibank and that we had to spend some additional billions (how many has yet to be determined) to save AIG for the third time effectively said that we are now in a situation where the government does own some of the banking industry and the debate should now be about the how and not the whether or not. This mess sent shock waves through the financial markets and virtually every bank saw their stock prices get “adjusted” accordingly. There was a time this week that Citibank was trading for less than the cost of a Jr. Bacon Cheeseburger at Wendys.
- The reality of GM’s scenario became a lot clearer and not in a way that was going to make the economy any healthier. There’s a phrase in business accounting called, “A Going Concern.” What does that mean? Essentially it means that a business is generating enough income and has enough cash to continue in business. Well, GM not only had some bad news in terms of sales, but they admitted that their auditors don’t believe that they can remain in business. That’s a pretty strong indication that GM’s condition is a lot worse than what we thought a couple of months ago. What does the prospect of a GM bankruptcy mean? Best case scenario – renegotiated contracts with the UAW and bond holders, substantial job losses and dealership closures. Worst case scenario – total liquidation of GM and absolutely staggering job losses that will make what we’ve seen so far look like nothing. GM’s stock was trading at 75 year lows.
- Underwater housing – The reality is that over 20% of thepeople in the US who have mortgages on their house owe as much or more than what it’s worth. When the government institutes a program to save homowners from foreclosure that allows lenders to refinance over 100% of value, it sends a message that house prices and the drop in them is a big problem.
- Fannie and Freddie’s new refi plan – Two weeks ago, the government said they were coming out with a new plan that would help people refinance their homes even though property values have fallen. They said they’d come out with it on Wednesday. On Wednesday, they came out with 2 paragraphs about the plan. On Thursday, Freddie Mac came out with more details. I’ve written more about it, but I think it’s going to give some people the opportunity to save some money. However, I’ve had a couple of people ask me, “aren’t these type of high loan to value no income verification loans the ones that got us in trouble in the first place?” Yes, they are, but here’s the way that I look at it: Fannie and Freddie have the opportunity to exchange a number of mortgages with interest rates in say the 6.5% range with interest rates in the 5.25% range and lower payments and the hope is that those lower payments will make it easier for those clients to hopefully avoid foreclosure problems.
- Jobs – We woke up to the realization that February, a short month, was a long month for a LOT of people. We’re now up to 4.1 million jobs lost in this recession.
- The stock market went into a major sell off this week. A few minor rallies, but we’ve essentially lost 12 years in the market, and 6% just in the last week.
March 7, 2009
What it all means….
I think that there are three main themes to this past week and all of them revolve around the “Week We Woke Up” scenario:
- We need to do something major about the banking industry and it isn’t going to be pretty and it isn’t going to be pain free.
- We need to do something about GM and it isn’t going to be pretty and it isn’t going to be pain free. (I know, I’m repeating myself).
- The current (and previous) batch of stopgap measures that have been aimed at slowing the fall of house prices, increasing the amount of credit being loaned, helping banks get healthy and other assorted TARP maneuvers aren’t working and won’t help unless we have a systemic plan to fix the economy.
I think it’s an understatement to say that we’re going to look back 3 months, 6 months and a year from now and see the first week of March as a turning point. A turning point as in the bottom? Nope, I wish. A turning point as in the consumers are saying, “This is bigger than we thought, different than we thought and is going to require more long term fundamental changes to the way our society operates, consumers plan their retirements and how people think about real estate and the stock markets.”
I’ll continue to keep you informed, if you know anyone who would like a copy of this e-mailed to them weekly, have them sign up at Straight Talk About Mortgages
As always, let me know what you think. Thanks!
Sean Purcell says:
Hmmm… quite a dire report. Not sure though, whether I am more fearful of the (temporary) problems we face or the (very long-term) damage from all those “solutions” we keep getting.
You’re right of course about the banks and that’s the answer to your GM question as well. I wrote about this previously, the administration has made clear its intentions: massive expansion of federal power and the opportunity to fix all of our problems through their superiority. GM will not go through any type of standard BK (it is, in fact, already bankrupt) and a car czar will be put in charge of overseeing the government’s “ownership” interest. (The view from the left is these companies failed their customers by not producing “green” cars and those will be the marching orders… God save us from ourselves.)
The new housing plans are pointless, which is the most optimistic expectation we can have for centralized decision-making. Usually the results are much more devastating; here we’ll just waste a few billion not helping anyone. A 105% cap is ludicrous. Either you wish to stem foreclosures (not necessarily a luadable goal) or you don’t. Typical government action: foot on the gas and the brake at the same time.
Unemployment is a huge problem, as you and I have discussed before. But it is also a somewhat lagging indicator. I think we can expect to top out around 10% and find the feigned surprise by economists, politicians and news reporters disgusting. They know roughly where unemployment is expected to go based on an overview of the industries that are constricting. All the handwringing ignores the historic record of unemployment but provides great cover for continued government expansion.
I do agree with you that we will look back at this time as a seminal moment. We allowed our fears to put in place an administration and a Congress that is making the largest, most devastating economic decisions since Nixon tried price and wage floors. The recession will end soon enough – all recessions do – but the incompetent, costly damage being wrought on our markets will leave many, many scars. I would suggest that your next report discuss in detail the fall-out from hyper-inflation on our businesses and especially our investment and retirement accounts.
Thanks for taking the time to create this post Tom. It always allows us the opportunity for some enjoyable discussions.
March 8, 2009 — 8:00 am
John Sabia says:
“I do agree with you that we will look back at this time as a seminal moment. We allowed our fears to put in place an administration and a Congress that is making the largest, most devastating economic decisions since Nixon tried price and wage floors”.
so true…
March 8, 2009 — 9:59 am
Brian Brady says:
“debate should now be about the how and not the whether or not.”
Actually, it should be about the how not. How quickly can we break up these outdated institutions and get them in the hands of local, productive entrepreneurs?
March 8, 2009 — 10:08 am
Tom Vanderwell says:
Brian,
Absolutely. My point was that essentially we’re already nationalizing them, let’s focus on what we have to do to get them reshaped into the type of institutions that will actually work….
Thanks for clarifying it for me.
Tom
March 8, 2009 — 10:32 am
Tom Vanderwell says:
I would suggest that your next report discuss in detail the fall-out from hyper-inflation on our businesses and especially our investment and retirement accounts.
Sean,
Hmmm – good idea. Wheels are starting to turn on that one.
I do agree that the jury is still out on which is going to be more painful – the problem or the solutions. Time will tell us a lot on that.
So I just keep writing and telling it like I see it.
Tom
March 8, 2009 — 10:38 am
Jeff Brown says:
I wonder how deep the panic in the White House would be if GM unilaterally declared bankruptcy? It would allow them to take the unions to the woodshed, and in public for all to see. The thought alone has me grinning.
Like a river defiled by a foreign substance, the economy will clean itself up if allowed. All this ‘help’ isn’t about improving the economy, it’s about changing the foundational values on which our country was launched.
So far, freedom to fail, and capitalism are taking a beating.
March 8, 2009 — 11:25 am