Remember those impetuous, ne’er do well subprime borrowers and those greedy subprime lenders? Writing about them is sooo… 2007 but I’m happy to report that both greed and reckless abandon are alive and well today….
…at Bank of America.
Remember Ken Lewis? He’s that sober-faced, bespectacled CEO of the Charlotte-based behemoth that started out as North Carolina National Bank and the Bank of Italy in San Francisco. Ken has presided over Bank of America since 2001. Since then, he’s been binging on banks like a subprime borrower stripped equity out of the old ranch: He bought Fleet Bank in 2004, MBNA in 2005, and ABN-AMRO, LaSalle Bank, and US Trust Company in 2007.
That wasn’t enough. Like a subprime borrower addicted to Vegas, strippers, and shiny new Hummers, he was having too much fun to see the market turn. What did Ken do while the house of cards was a-tumblin’?
He bought Countrywide Financial, America’s largest mortgage originator.
Still, that wasn’t enough. Like a crack-addict jonesin’ for a last hit on the pipe, Ken absorbed America’s largest securities brokerage, Merrill Lynch. Just like the crack addict who spent his welfare check on that last hit, Ken took money from the government to cure his fix for power.
Wall Street doesn’t like what Ken’s done. Since the bailout binge, BAC has dropped from $37 to about three bucks as it became America’s largest subprime lender/servicer (Countrywide originated a boatload of subprime, option ARMs, and Alt-A paper while Merrill’s First Franklin was in the top three of subprime lenders). A guy that eschewed the whole “subprime” lending market jumped into the deep end, drunk with power.
Now, it’s not just Wall Street that’s calling for Ken’s head. It seems that the unions’ pension fund managers are pissed off, too:
CtW Investment Group, which said its affiliated funds own 116 million Bank of America shares, faulted Lewis for not backing out of the merger or revealing Merrill’s losses in a timely manner, and letting Merrill pay $3.6 billion in executive bonuses just before the merger closed.
It said Lewis’ actions have contributed to a 90 percent drop in Bank of America’s share price since the merger was announced last September 15. The merger closed on January 1.
Lewis took “outsized, reckless risks” in acquiring Merrill, and his removal “is necessary to restore investor confidence,” CtW Executive Director William Patterson said in a March 5 letter to O. Temple Sloan Jr, the bank’s lead outside director. The Washington, D.C. group has undertaken shareholder campaigns against other companies in the past.
Ken’s response? The same adolescent approach failed subprime borrowers took; he was PRESSURED to do it:
Lewis has said he tried to back out of the merger in the middle of December, but that federal regulators urged him to close. Bank of America received $20 billion of new capital from the government in January to help absorb losses at Merrill.
Oh brother! Will someone please sentence this bozo to a year in a shuttered shack in suburban Stockton, like Joe Pesci in The Super? He could bring his buddies Thain and Mozilo. The three of them can get hustled on the courts and get a taste of what life is like when you act recklessly.
For what it’s worth, I never did jump on the pass line with BofA. Michael Cook answered my question so well that it scared the bejeezus out of me. I still think BofA will get a strong enough lifeline big enough government bailout that the stock could go to $20 in 5-6 years, but Krazy Ken won’t be in the executive office.
Seriously, how much CAN a three dollar stock drop?
Brian Brady says:
“CtW Investment Group, which said its affiliated funds own 116 million Bank of America shares, faulted Lewis for not backing out of the merger or revealing Merrill’s losses in a timely manner, and letting Merrill pay $3.6 billion in executive bonuses just before the merger closed.”
I just noticed the math on this. Lewis allowed a bonus out equivalent to 9.5 times what the current market value of CTW’s BAC position is. I think I’d be pissed off, too.
March 6, 2009 — 12:43 am
Paul Francis says:
Nice article… brings back memories of when I was in the casino business. Except for the fact that casinos were more responsible when it came to credit and only issued it to people with money to pay it back.
And I thought my days of watching degenerates throwing good money on bad bets during a bad losing streak was over…
Unfortunately… what I see going on now is far worse then anything I ever saw in the casino.
March 6, 2009 — 3:12 am
peterfedrick says:
The Depositors receive Tax Free interest on US Government guaranteed deposits and a 10% Tax Credit. Absolute Worst case scenario they would break even due to Stop Loss Assurances. The government has not funded a single dollar.
Check out http://theprosperitymandate.org
March 6, 2009 — 4:48 am
daniel says:
B of A used our tax dollars to essentially buy a tax deduction for themselves (ML). This aqusition lowered their tax burden for the next few years which ‘creates’ the money to pay the tax payers loan back from the savings. Meaning they essentially aquired ML for free or nearly free thanks to the generosity of US taxpayers. It may be some rough sailing right now but I suspect they will still be ‘too big to fail’ when the ship rights itself.
March 6, 2009 — 10:08 am
Smithers says:
“Seriously, how much CAN a three dollar stock drop?”
Um … $3?
March 6, 2009 — 10:44 am
Sean Purcell says:
Smithers,
Sean
March 6, 2009 — 12:19 pm
Sean Purcell says:
Smithers,
That last comment would have made more sense if I had a video camera… I was pointing at your comment “Um… $3?” with one hand and pointing to the tip of my nose with the other…
Interestingly enough, I had a realtor client of mine call me this morning for my opinion on buying Citi. After all, “they’re at a buck,” he said. How bad can it get? Well… it can get to zero. Citi seems to be in worse shape than BofA, but my thought is the same for both of them: do you want to own stock in a company the government is running? I know, I know it may all turn around and the government may do the right thing and sell their shares after leading these comanies to financial bliss… (I’ll pause here till the laughing stops) but you may just end up owning shares in a company no different than the post office. Anybody see that as a sound philosophy?
These companies are an especially bad buy when you consider how many good companies are out there getting their stock handed to them just for being publicly traded. I think that’s a smarter long-term play. The financial field is not going to be an opportunity rich environment for a while…
Sean
March 6, 2009 — 12:31 pm
Paul Francis says:
I can think of some other financial companies that actually make money… their stock has taken a big hit in price just because they are in the financial sector.
For anybody who thinks a buck or three is worth putting up, do some research on some regional banks that never got involved in Sub-Prime lending and were conservative in their risk.
And that’s the true travesty… rewarding bad behavior.
March 6, 2009 — 1:11 pm
Grog says:
Dumb ass lenders!
Scuse the language but I hope the brokers out there that wrote that shit paper…enjoy eating beanie weenies!
March 6, 2009 — 2:01 pm
Brian Brady says:
“Um … $3?”
I hear ya- it was an inside joke from my last post. Now, you’re on the inside of the joke for the next one, Smithers.
March 6, 2009 — 3:33 pm
Kevin Sandridge says:
“Dumb ass lenders! Scuse the language but I hope the brokers out there that wrote that shit paper…enjoy eating beanie weenies!”
Amen! I still feel like I’m paying for their bad social karma!
March 6, 2009 — 9:41 pm
sharonalters says:
So where are the indictments for the bad boy bankers, loan officers and buyers who lied through their teeth to pass all that bad paper along as Grade A securities to hapless investors?
March 6, 2009 — 10:01 pm
Scott G says:
This is ridiculous. I can’t believe that people are actually getting away with stuff like this.
March 7, 2009 — 9:57 am
Smithers says:
Of course, BAC (and Chitia) would be at $0 and in Chapter 11 but for the FDIC insurance keeping depositors from making a run (plus the promises of endless gubment dollars (think AIG), instead of forcing them to break up, go under, and go away.
Both institutions are prime examples of what happens when “too big to fail” meets “too f’d to survive”.
Don’t get me started on GM.
March 7, 2009 — 7:16 pm
Brian Brady says:
“instead of forcing them to break up, go under, and go away.”
I’d point you to my “Break up the Banks” post but you’ve been there
March 7, 2009 — 8:38 pm
Robert Kerr says:
I LOVE the way you wrote the recap Brian. When I wasn’t giggling, I was nodding in agreement.
Good stuff. Geno-quality, almost!
March 7, 2009 — 10:15 pm
Smithers says:
Brian – Apologies, I had forgotten about it, but I just re-read it. Yes – exactly. That was true 6 months ago, and more true today.
It may happen. Obama’s hand may be forced.
March 8, 2009 — 2:07 pm