Okay, so the National Association of Realtors has made a big deal out of its search for a “Social Media Director.” Apparently I’m the only person who finds the terms “social media” and “director” to be inherently self-contradictory, but that doesn’t matter anyway.
Why? Because the NAR is interested in social media for two reasons only, neither of which will resonate with anyone in our world.
Their two objectives are these:
First — and primarily — they want to clamp down on and control everything associated with real estate in the participatory internet. Dinosaur organizations are censorious by their nature, but the NAR is very much like the Mafia in its need to control its message, silencing dissenters and whistle-blowers.
Second, the NAR wants to turn the Web 2.0 world into yet another distribution channel for treacly, sleazy sales propaganda.
I never thought of Pinocchio as a wise-guy before, but it comes to the same thing. You can’t get too near The Boys without becoming one of them, and if you lend any part of your credibility — your reputation for moral probity — to the NAR, it will turn you into yet another insipid, perpetually-smiling marionette. Dance, puppet, dance!
I think this might be a three princes fable. If it is, the first prince may well be Todd Carpenter, who for some insane reason actually wants this job. At least he had better want it, because he gave me as a character reference and I gave him a glowing review. If the NAR actually understands its world and ours, my recommendation should have worked the other way for Todd. But my impression was that they ate it up.
Prince number two is NAR CEO Dale Stinton, who has announced that the new Social Media Director has already been chosen, but who won’t reveal who is the poor benighted soul who will get to be torn to shreds by both the lady and the tiger, never knowing for sure which is which.
I don’t actually know who the third prince is, but for the moment I’m betting on me. I abhor the whole idea of leadership, but serving as the leader of an inescapably leaderless movement has its appeal. And it is by now obvious to me that no one else is willing to take on the role.
That’s as may be. The big news, for me, about the Stintion non-announcement announcement, is this: The real announcement will be made at REBarCamp Virginia on March 3.
Give yourself a moment to gnaw on that. By refusing every attempt at definition, the entire BarCamp movement is as poorly defended as a tribe of pre-Columbian paleo-Americans coming into contact with a boatload of syphilitic Spaniards — but still…
If we go to their dipshit events, we’re taking our chances. Just don’t sleep with the smirking marionettes! But for REBarCamp to invite the NAR into its own bed — that’s just disgusting.
“Oh, but Greg! You don’t understand! Dale Stinton really gets it!”
You bet he does. He understands perfectly — as the NAR always has — that the best way to recruit new marionettes is to charm them into tying on their own strings, voluntarily.
If Dale Stinton “gets it,” where is he? A week or two ago, I gave Stefan Swanepoel a couple of swats over his new countdown of allegedly important real estate trends. The second-most import trend, per Swanepoel, is the participatory internet. Yet the man is nowhere to be found in the comments thread. I gave him a beautiful opening to come here and defend his book — what would David Gibbons have done? — but what do we hear? Nothing but silence.
Every time you turn around, you hear someone being touted as a social media guru — except for the part about their knowing nothing whatever about how to live in our world. Stinton, Swanepoel, Brad Inman… I could go on all day. They all live in the dinosaur world, and they all want dress up in camouflage and pretend to live in our world.
That much is to be expected. You either get it — really get it — or you don’t. If you don’t, then everything is just another trend, just another fad, just another chance to hustle the rubes by pretending to be one of them. And yet when someone really makes it all the way into our world, there is no mistaking the radical changes in the way they go about everything.
So how will we be able to tell if someone in the NAR really gets it? I would look for something like this: A Twitter emission reading, “I just quit my leadership position at the NAR. Can you folks ever forgive me?” An honest mafioso is an ex-mafioso. There is no middle ground.
And all of that matters to me not at all. The destiny of all dinosaurs is to become very prosperous ant colonies. The question that matters is this one:
What about us?
I personally keep everything at arm’s length — even things I like — because I never want to seem to stand in support of some evil by failing to have stood against it. But the barbarians are at REBarCamp’s gates — not arrayed for battle but dressed for the party to which they have been invited as guests.
If you just said, “Ew!” — you know exactly what I’m talking about.
This essay might be a smidgen short on literary metaphors, so I’ll kick up one more: It was you who put the Boojum under the bed. You conjured it into existence, and then you gave it all its fearsome powers, giving yourself the corresponding fears. And it doesn’t matter how many clever traps you set for it. It’s too clever to be caught. But there it is, under the bed every night, night after night, waiting for you to let your guard down for just a second…
So here’s the question for the wired world of Realtors as the NAR lays its plans for taking over our world:
How do you get rid of the Boojum under the bed?
The answer is childishly simple: You grow out of it.
It not just because of the participatory internet that we are what we are. We embrace the ethics of the Web 2.0 world because we held those ethics before the Web 2.0 idea existed. Or rather, the wired world as we know it exists because people very much like us brought it into existence as the realization of their own moral ideals. In short, the geeks are inheriting the earth.
Our objective is not to fight off the NAR — raging dinosaurs and snarling marionettes and undead ghouls with really big hair. All we need to do is to supplant it by eclipsing it — by every criterion that matters to consumers.
Do you see? All we have to do is become so much better at delivering the product that mere Realtors will be seen as second rate and the Realtor brand will become the imprimatur of inferior quality.
I feel bad for the BarCampers, but, in the end, none of this matters. If the new Social Media Underboss really is Todd Carpenter, I hope he has sense enough to quit before his face freezes like that, but that’s his lookout. All we have to do is keep doing what we’ve been doing — and keep getting better at it — and the Boojum under the bed will be gone forever.
Tony Sena says:
I met Todd at ReBlog World in Las Vegas a few months back and I thought he was a pretty cool guy. Just from talking to him, you can tell he is knows his stuff and will probably do a great job as the NAR Social Media Director. On the flip side, why would he want this job?
February 22, 2009 — 8:42 pm
jay seville says:
—This essay might be a smidgen short on literary metaphors, so I’ll kick up one more
Hilarious!
This post is classic Bloodhound (BH)! It is so dang right on. Why the heck do I have to be a member of NAR to provide consulting services on real estate?##!!# They’ve screwed most anything positive associated with word realtor so that I don’t even use it anymore. My brokerage requires me to be a member and perhaps even my association through which I believe I must join to get access to our MRIS.
CONTROL FREAKS. The only possible good I think they could do is working on health care insurance options for its members or other causes related to sole proprietorships in general because many legislative positions they take are big gov big spending initiatives to which I am diametrically opposed.
And definitely there are web 2.0 wannabees out there hoping to salvage some of the last remaining influence they have before moving on trying to make a buck elsewhere….
February 23, 2009 — 5:44 am
Ken brand says:
I do a lot of reading, for fun and thinking. I can always count on you to shine a flash light, sometimes a search light, on issues and perspectives that can’t be found elsewhere.
I also appreciate the time, attention, detail and passion you invest in sharing.
This post drips with both fun and thinking. Your paleo-Americans and boat loads of syphilitic Spaniards metaphor is picture perfect, the rest makes my eyes widen and ears perk.
Whoever the mystery man or woman is, I wish them the very best.
Woof On.
Thanks.
February 23, 2009 — 5:45 am
Joe says:
Very true observation, Greg. Many bloggers and commentators seem to feel like adding a community manager is going to change NAR. Just remember who is paying him and what NAR’s objectives are. New transparancy for NAR? hahahahaha.
February 23, 2009 — 7:51 am
Genuine Chris Johnson says:
what’s the price on your credibility.
February 23, 2009 — 8:36 am
Thomas A B Johnson says:
Like the Vichy French who thought they could reason with those nice German boys and looked up one day and said, “At least they spared Paris.” I doubt the Vichy Social Media Director will be anything more than an expense account with a mandate to infiltrate those pesky REBarCamps and pass out Active Rain/Trulia/HomeGain discount coupons er, one way train tickets.
Greg, perhaps you are not a prince, but the most wanted man in the Resistance.
February 23, 2009 — 9:16 am
Bob says:
It wont matter who it is because the position is already irrelevant. They’ll be preaching to the Jim Jones choir.
February 23, 2009 — 12:55 pm
Todd Covington says:
As a new agent, I find some of the propaganda that the NAR distributes, disturbing. I know for a fact that some of their skewed numbers NAR post are misleading and it makes me mad. I know consumer confidence is important but straight facts would give the National Association of Realtors much more credibility.
The aggressive stance they have taken on website names with Realtor and MLS in them shows a true monopolistic approach to the way they operate.
February 23, 2009 — 6:31 pm
Brad Coy says:
“We embrace the ethics of the Web 2.0 world because we held those ethics before the Web 2.0 idea existed. Or rather, the wired world as we know it exists because people very much like us brought it into existence as the realization of their own moral ideals.”
That’s one worth repeating. If there is one thing I cannot stand in the culture of Real Estate, it’s that it’s so damn provincial. REBarCamp is an opportunity for forward thinking people in our industry to motivate themselves and collaborate like we do right here. It’s a hard push because we are so used to being lead. I have personally tried to push for the involvement of people who really do ‘get it’ to get involved. There are a lot of smart people getting involved, yet they could easily be matched or overwhelmed by the ‘help’ that others could provide to sponsor/organize these events. Either way – the spirit lives on in the realization of the ideal – next step in the ladder.
If we want, we can get lazy, and we can have another conference series. This time with the attendees/organizers doing the heavy lifting with beer for pay or we can better grow our businesses in a new environment. If not, then REBarCamp can become RENarCamp as easy as that – nothing I’m personally interested in. But if I were to say that this does not matter to me, I’d be lying.
Too bad another very well written post might go quiet in the comments, for here is a chance to.. Oh, I forgot. No one reads BHB anymore. 🙂
Plainly speaking for my Pre-Colombian self – Brad
February 24, 2009 — 1:29 am
Greg Swann says:
> Too bad another very well written post might go quiet in the comments, for here is a chance to.. Oh, I forgot. No one reads BHB anymore.
This post did really well — all by back-channels. That’s sad, because I should think it would be obvious by now to everyone that clique-speak don’t cut it. The people who smile and smile are the ones who are going to sell you out in a heartbeat — to the NAR, to Inman, to the vendors. The future of the RE.net belongs to the folks who, in Washington’s phrase, “avoid entangling alliances.”
February 24, 2009 — 9:58 am
Mike Price says:
How did the selection of Todd Carpenter as an employee of NAR evolve into a takeover of RE Barcamp? Todd is only one of a core group of people that helped establish RE Barcamp, the momentum has happened on it’s own and would have whether Todd was involved or not. Todd has no more control over the overall RE Barcamp concept and movement than any other person involved, which is to say he has ZERO control. He doesn’t own or control anything of substance than can be transferred to any person or entity. I’ve had a number of discussions with people on this subject lately and the consensus is that RE Barcamp will remain as it has. Anything close to an attempt to wrestle control will surely kill the entire concept and it won’t be a slow death. Those involved will just walk away and if the bag is held solely by NAR, it will be empty with no hope of filling it back up with the goodwill that has been created thus far. I’m pretty sure the folks at NAR realize that the success of RE Barcamp has come from the basis of the Barcamp concept in the first place. Essentially the First Rule of Barcamp is that Nobody Owns Barcamp. I have no issue with NAR being a participant in the process just like anyone else, and I also harbor no illusion that a Trojan Horse has come rolling in either. If I’m wrong, I won’t lament over any time I’ve lost. I’ll just move on. From my discussions with other key organizers and the major sponsors that have helped thus far, I won’t be alone.
February 27, 2009 — 9:50 am
Brian Brady says:
“How did the selection of Todd Carpenter as an employee of NAR evolve into a takeover of RE Barcamp?”
You answered it here:
“I also harbor no illusion that a Trojan Horse has come rolling in either.”
…but that’s not all. Witness ( sort of) NARCamp Virginia and then….NARCamp San Diego, hosted by…?
NAR, at the Annual Conference and Expo ! Bring your ties for this one, folks
Mike, the guys on Active Rain already think I’m a conspiracy theorist so you know…it’s just Brady, being Brady.
February 27, 2009 — 11:37 am
Mike Price says:
So VAR is playing host to a Barcamp and NAR offered up the space to do San Diego. I know Todd wants to be point man on the San Diego event, but somebody has to do it and NAR just happened to set that one up, it wont work unless he can get the ground troops of volunteers to pull it off, there are many other events underway that have no NAR involvement at all. I’m still not buying into the theory. If I’m wrong on this I will bow out of the whole thing and move on. I feel strongly that NAR can not take a lead role in the RE Barcamp movement and many others feel the same way. If it turns out there are two “camps” with regard to that position (sorry no pun intended) then the whole thing will just fade away into another sad commentary on the path of best intentions. Hopefully Todd and/or Hilary will put all this to bed with a public comment.
Personally I think each local RE Barcamp should be setting up their own web sites, wikis and resources – we did that in Houston and Boston is setting up their own site, after a year or so there will be no need at all for a centralized point of information distribution or organization and the main RE Barcamp site can just get shut down and leave the events to the local markets and the local organizers.
February 27, 2009 — 12:05 pm