There’s always something to howl about.

Free “gifts” for real estate webloggers: “The need to deny influence is damaging to the soul”

On Vendorslut Eve, here are a couple of quick notes on free “gifts” and their intended influence:

Richard Riccelli points out this New York Times article:

Starting Jan. 1, the pharmaceutical industry has agreed to a voluntary moratorium on the kind of branded goodies — Viagra pens, Zoloft soap dispensers, Lipitor mugs — that were meant to foster good will and, some would say, encourage doctors to prescribe more of the drugs.

No longer will Merck furnish doctors with purplish adhesive bandages advertising Gardasil, a vaccine against the human papillomavirus. Banished, too, are black T-shirts from Allergan adorned with rhinestones that spell out B-O-T-O-X. So are pens advertising the Sepracor sleep drug Lunesta, in whose barrel floats the brand’s mascot, a somnolent moth.

Some skeptics deride the voluntary ban as a superficial measure that does nothing to curb the far larger amounts drug companies spend each year on various other efforts to influence physicians. But proponents welcome it as a step toward ending the barrage of drug brands and logos that surround, and may subliminally influence, doctors and patients.

It’s not just a matter of subliminal influence. When every pen and pad you use comes from a vendor, the vendors are underwriting your office supplies budget. The “in-kind” gift translates directly to an “in-cash” benefit.

Here’s a very complete disclosure on this issue of “gifts” and affiliate marketing from the Mortgage Sales Blog:

While most of the information provided on this mortgage blog does not include product pitches or personal agendas, some of the authors may generate income by selling services to loan officers or real estate agents.

Personally approved mortgage vendors participate on this blog as a way to expand their online reach, develop relationships with our readers, and prove that their products are worth taking a look at.

In the instance where it is not obvious, I will make every attempt to be fully transparent with our readers about any affiliate agreements where the Mortgage Sales Blog receives financial compensation by promoting a product or service on this blog.

As of Jan 4th, 2009, the Mortgage Sales Blog (Mark Madsen) has not promoted any product or service where an affiliate agreement was in place.

The MortgageSalesBlog.com does not necessarily endorse any of the products or mortgage vendors mentioned on this site.  However, some of our contributors may have affiliate business arrangements, co-marketing agreements, and personal interests that will most certainly create a bias in the way information is shared or interpreted.

Even though we do not do paid product reviews, we are open to accepting free trials (not bribes) of products or services that may result in a favorable mention on this blog.  As expressed above, there will be disclosure, but our goal is not to trick our readers into buying something we don’t believe in.

I’d rather have a vendor pay me to teach them how to blog about their own stuff.

Now that our cards are on the table, please use your own judgment and research before making a final decision to spend your valuable time and money following the advice of any of our contributors.

That’s not as hard a line as I might draw, but at least everything is fully disclosed, in detail, in advance. The comments on that post are worth reading, too.

I refuse most of the appeals I get from the mainstream media. Why? Because all they’re looking for is waxed-fruit, a pre-defined set piece in the tableaux they had constructed before they called. The same sort of thing goes for vendors and their earnest appeals for feedback — lubricated with free drinks — from real estate webloggers. They don’t want your feedback, they want your readers. Amazingly enough, no matter what they might say to you, pretty young girls in slinky cocktail dresses don’t really have a thing for clunky, chunky, balding guys in Sears & Roebuck suits.

Here’s the deal, sad but true: If you didn’t look like man-bites-dog to the reporter, the reporter would not have called. If the girl hadn’t already weighed your wallet, she’d be nuzzled up to a different fat guy. And if you didn’t have a weblog to be exploited, the vendors would treat you just like they did before you had a weblog to be exploited: You would just be another cow to be milked, instead of, potentially, a highly-prized volunteer dairy farmer.

They’re selling product, and, if they’re bad at it, they get fired. They are courting you to get you to sell their product for them — to get you to sell out your readers in exchange for free drinks and free “gifts” and pretended friendship.

To the reporter you’re a cipher and to the hooker you’re a john. But to the vendor you’re a stooge — or, even worse, a shill. You can try to deny this disgrace, but as the shrink says at the end of the Times article, “The need to deny influence is damaging to the soul.”

Technorati Tags: , , ,