From The Wall Street Journal’s Op-Ed page: America Needs Its Frontier Spirit. Daniel Henninger spells it out. And quite nicely, I might add. An excerpt:
The greatest danger in the current economic crisis is that the United States will lose its historic appetite for risk. The mood now is that risk-taking got us into this mess. Risk, though, is the quintessential American trait that built the nation — from the Battle of Bunker Hill to the rise of the microchip. If we let risk give way to a new ethos of commercial reserve and regulatory restriction, the upward arc of the U.S. ascendancy will flatten. Maybe it already has.
This is the moment for Americans to rediscover the “frontier thesis” of Frederick Jackson Turner. In a seminal paper delivered in 1893 to the American Historical Association, “The Significance of the Frontier in American History,” Turner argued that the U.S. found its identity as it pushed away from the Eastern seaboard and crossed a series of frontier “fall lines”: the Allegheny Mountains, the Mississippi, the Missouri, the plains, the Rocky Mountains and California.
Every American absorbs the frontier experience from reading biographies of great Americans or from movies. Frederick Turner, however, made it clear that with this effort to transform the wilderness the Americans broke decisively with what he called, believe it or not, “old Europe.” “Here is a new product,” Turner wrote, “that is American.”
“From the conditions of frontier life,” Turner believed, “came [American] intellectual traits of profound importance . . . coarseness and strength combined with acuteness and inquisitiveness; that practical, inventive turn of mind, quick to find expedients; that masterful grasp of material things, lacking in the artistic but powerful to effect great ends; that restless, nervous energy, that dominant individualism, working for good and for evil.” These, he said, are “the traits of the frontier.”
That last paragraph sings to me. I’m reading this in Dayton Ohio, Land of the Next Frontier- you heard it here first. There aren’t a lot of us left in Dayton, so things are becoming wild and woolly and it’s gonna get more so in the next few years. It’s a bit surreal to be living here right now, and at the same time it’s strangely exciting as if the entire past has been erased and only the future is ahead. It’s like traveling down a road and you turn around for a look back and the road behind you has vanished, but in front of you lies everything you ever wanted. Scary, exhilarating, promising, frightening all at the same time, and not necessarily in that order. What does the future hold? Who knows? Whatever we want it to hold, right? Which is, from my place, a damn fine place to be. If I lived in a more economically stable city, the future might simply hold more of the same. I really hate more of the same. Everything in me says change is good and I think Dayton is where it’s at because we stagnated for quite awhile trying to avoid change.
Read this again: “intellectual traits of profound importance . . . coarseness and strength combined with acuteness and inquisitiveness; that practical, inventive turn of mind, quick to find expedients; that masterful grasp of material things, lacking in the artistic but powerful to effect great ends; that restless, nervous energy, that dominant individualism, working for good and for evil.” These, he said, are “the traits of the frontier.” ”
What’s next for us? How does someone survive here? I only see one way to make it through alive; in everything we do- life, love, work, real estate- from here on out, we, Dayton, I, my family and friends, we must embrace the Frontier Spirit and forge ahead, take chances, take risks, and have huge successes, or make mistakes, fuck it all up and try it again. I’m looking down the barrel of that gun, kids, but I’m always game for an adventure.
Missy Caulk says:
Do we have a choice? For those of us that are committed to our careers we forge ahead.
I was newly married in the late 70’s and a baby in 1980, we were so poor I didn’t realize the rest of the economy was bad.
I’ve been watching the hearings today with the Big 3, which they are now calling the Detroit 3, so you can imagine the mood I am in…
Michigan will be a 3rd world country if they fail.
December 4, 2008 — 1:39 pm
Craig Klein says:
Great article Teri!
Could you please get yourself up to DC and have a talk with those auto execs?
History is made of cycles. In economies, the cycles are mostly about the conflict between those that HAVE and will do anything to protect the status quo and those that will do anything to GET some.
America was founded by the later group. I’m afraid the country’s being run by the former at the moment.
December 4, 2008 — 2:38 pm
Teri Lussier says:
Missy-
>Michigan will be a 3rd world country if they fail.
Ohio too. Dayton is fast on it’s way, but there are enormous opportunities here. Life as I know it is gone, but that doesn’t mean the end of life. We hope.
I’m working on the assumption that the Detroit 3 and the states affected will be left to swing… More opportunity to recreate our lives.
December 4, 2008 — 2:47 pm
Teri Lussier says:
Hi Craig-
>Could you please get yourself up to DC and have a talk with those auto execs?
Sure. And you get yerself off to Wall Street and explain it to the bums there. 😉
December 4, 2008 — 2:50 pm
Eric Blackwell says:
Teri;
Thank you.
I take courage in the fact that there are people who will look at our beloved midwest and view it as a frontier (challenge and opportunity, built into one masochistic popcorn ball, waiting to be bitten into.) rather than “the Rust belt”. It doesn’t get more demeaning in my book than when someone calls someone else’s home “The rust belt.”
Those hardy brave souls who take this on are truly free to win or fail, but they will be better for the journey…as were our forebearers. (IMHO)
best;
Eric
December 4, 2008 — 3:27 pm
Teri Lussier says:
>…(challenge and opportunity, built into one masochistic popcorn ball, waiting to be bitten into.)…
>Those hardy brave souls who take this on are truly free to win or fail, but they will be better for the journey…as were our forebearers. (IMHO)
You have the soul of a poet, Eric. That’s beautiful.
>It doesn’t get more demeaning in my book than when someone calls someone else’s home “The rust belt.”
You know, I never thought about like that. In fact, I suppose I wear that proudly as a sign of a tough rugged individual who can handle anything! I suppose I’ve always thought like a pioneer. 😀
December 4, 2008 — 3:58 pm
John Mowatt says:
Risk can be bad.Risk can be good.What is good risk? Well its simple really.Good risk is based on good judgement.You look at all the facts and make a decision to take a risk based on your interpretation of what is most likely to be the result.
Bad risk is based solely on a snap judgment with no weighing of the facts. When subprime mortgages were given to people who obviously could not afford them this was very bad risk taking. It was based solely on greed rather than on weighing the facts. Now we see the results.
Hopefully the USA is not going to lose it’s appetite for risk. I believe the entrpreneurial spirit will prevail but perhaps the present crisis will promote an appetite for good well considered risk taking rather than uncontrolled greed.
December 4, 2008 — 9:07 pm
Teri Lussier says:
John-
>I believe the entrpreneurial spirit will prevail but perhaps the present crisis will promote an appetite for good well considered risk taking
I like the word “appetite”. I think you are right- it’s going to be interesting to see what appetites emerge from this.
December 5, 2008 — 5:21 am
Irene Chandler and Jim Shultz says:
There has never been a more important time for leadership. We have creative leaders and entrepreneurs in this country far superior to virtually any other. Unfortunately, creative entrepreneurial leadership has been in somewhat short supply among our auto industry leaders. That must change and the sooner the better. If it does, our auto industry will rise again. If not, watch out below.
December 6, 2008 — 12:07 pm
Teri Lussier says:
>Unfortunately, creative entrepreneurial leadership has been in somewhat short supply among our auto industry leaders.
“Auto industry leaders” to me also must include the union bosses. Today’s WSJ interview offers me no hope of anything creative coming from that side either.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122852244367484311.html
December 6, 2008 — 12:14 pm
Irene Chandler and Jim Shultz says:
Yes, we agree. Auto industry leaders do indeed include union bosses. They are equally to blame for the downfall of our auto industry. They too must get their act together and somehow begin demonstrating 21st century creative leadership if we are to succeed in restoring the auto industry to a viable place in the US economy and worldwide car market.
December 10, 2008 — 12:01 pm