Well, it’s Friday again, so it’s time for another Mortgage Market Week in Review. I’m going to talk just a little about Fannie and Freddie and then deal with some of the other issues that are currently affecting the financial markets.
First Fannie and Freddie: As EVERYONE knows by now, Fannie and Freddie were taken over by the Federal Government last Sunday. What does that mean? A couple of things that have become clear so far: 1) The fact that US government is now not only implicitly backing Fannie and Freddie’s debt but explicitly (putting your money where their mouth is) has had a good effect on mortgage rates. We dropped as much as .5% on Monday and since then, things have trickled back up a bit, but we’re still .25% lower than we were last Friday. 2) One of the reasons that they did it was to keep the mortgage markets moving and that appears, at least so far, to be a success.
The things that aren’t so clear yet about the Fannie Freddie bailout are: 1) How much is it going to cost the taxpayers long term? 2) Are the executives really going to get the multi million dollar golden parachutes that it looks like? 3) Starting in 2010, Fannie and Freddie are supposed to downsize by 10% per year. What sort of mortgage market is going to take their place? That’s going to be a topic of a lot of discussion in the government going forward.
Now on to what else is effecting the markets. Let’s just say that it is looking like Fannie and Freddie won’t be the only financial firms that are going to suffer a financial death during the month of September. Here’s the latest as I know it:
Lehman Brothers is rumored (LOTs of rumors) to be on it’s death bed. What killed it? Too many investments in risky mortgages. They are supposedly looking for buyers who would save them from the untimely death. Will someone step in and buy them at the last minute? Maybe….. Who are the most likely buyers? The rumors have Bank of America and Goldman Sachs as the buyers. Will they buy them at market value? Uh, probably not!
Washington Mutual – While they are still maintaining that they are a strong bank, the market doesn’t really believe them. Their stock prices have gotten hammered lately, the ratings agencies have downgraded them, they are operating under a Memorandum of Understanding with their regulators (that’s sort of like a note from the principal) and it doesn’t look likely that they’ll be able to remain a complete entity. What’s the most likely scenario? A couple of them that have come out in the rumor mill on Wall St: 1) There are probably one or two banks who could be big enough to buy them in their entirety (Chase being the most likely one). 2) They sell off chunks of the bank to a variety of different entities. For instance, Citibank might buy their deposits and branches in one state, Chase might buy another, etc. 3) The FDIC comes in, shuts them down, opens them as a new entity and eventually parcels them out. Just to give you an idea the size we’re dealing with, the shut down of Indymac was the largest failure since 1984 and I’ve heard reports that Washington Mutual is 10 times the size of Indymac. Oh, and what’s the biggest problem with Washington Mutual? Too many risky mortgages. Sound like a recurring theme?
So what difference does this make to those who don’t have stock of Lehman or Washington Mutual? A couple of thoughts:
1. It shows that the credit crisis isn’t done and the ramifications of it are spreading further and further.
2. It raises questions about the Federal Government’s role in the financial services sector. Should the government help stem some of the losses with Lehman Brothers and WaMu? It’s reported that the FDIC is going to lose $9 billion (no that’s not a misprint) on Indymac. If WaMu is 10 times that size, would the loss be that big? Can the government afford to step in on something like this? Can they afford not to? No easy answers to that question.
3. If Lehman and WaMu go down, what will the ramifications for the rest of the financial world be? Will it make lending become more cautious? Will that in turn cause more problems?
A couple of other economic reports came out (though it’s been a light week for those:)
1. Retail sales came in lower than expected. Apparently people aren’t feeling much like shopping right now.
2. Wholesale prices came in lower than expected – mainly due to the lower cost of fuel (though Hurricane Ike could change that!)
3. Consumer Confidence came in better than expected – mainly due to lower cost of fuel (though Hurricane Ike could change that!)
A lot more questions than answers this week, and it’s that way for a couple of reasons:
1. We’re in the middle of an unraveling situation and it’s hard to know exactly which way things are going to fall with those issues.
2. I hope that people at the Treasury and the Fed and many other places of importance are asking questions and really assessing what the best course is. I’m afraid that if the government becomes the lender of last resort for these types of things, we are all going to regret it in the long run.
Have a good weekend and say a few extra prayers for those in the way of Hurricane Ike.
Until next time….
Quote of the week: “Freedom from fear and injustice and oppression will be ours only in the measure that men who value such freedom are ready to sustain its possession — to defend it against every thrust from within and without.” President Dwight Eisenhower
Michael Cook says:
FYI, the Goldman rumor was killed, but its just so crazy out there you never know…
September 12, 2008 — 10:23 am
Tom Vanderwell says:
Michael,
Yeah, I know it was killed, but just because the rumor was killed doesn’t necessarily mean the deal was in this market, does it?
Tom
September 12, 2008 — 10:28 am
Michael Cook says:
Tom,
I agree with you, but a more important point on that fact is that Goldman is typically the smartest money in the game. They made more money off this current crisis than anyone and if they dont want to get in the game at these prices then Lehman is probably in more trouble than we can imagine.
With so many banks and broker/dealers going under, I really wonder what the mortgage market will look like in the future. There is no question that the current system is broken, but what can be done to keep rates low, homeownership high and banks liquid. Mortgage is almost a four letter word on Wall Street right now.
September 12, 2008 — 10:38 am
David Shafer says:
Fannie sold $7 Billion in two year notes the other day; the offer was over subscribed. That is why the government stepped in. The pricing was good for Fannie.
I think any cost to tax payers will be small now that they were able to bring in that much $$.
One would think that by lowering their purchases by 10%/year that they will do this by underwriting even less risk. This will make it harder to get a conforming loan. For those outside of the tight underwriting standards, their loans will be more costly driving up the cost of home ownership. One wonders if they will continue to underwrite geography? Or just insist upon more money down for everyone?
WAMU is starting to look like toast, since no one wants to touch it???
Lehman is trying to sell of if commerical RE operation. If that is done then someone will come in and buy it, probably for a US presense.
Anyway, it should get interesting!
September 12, 2008 — 12:23 pm
Michael Cook says:
David,
If by small you mean well over $100 billion, sure. Selling additional debt, does not magically make your assets more valuable. They can make the debt sell because the investors know they are investing in the US government. That has nothing to do with how people pay on their mortgages. At $5+ trillion in mortgages, assuming a 5% default rate you are looking at $250 billion in losses. Even if the default rate is short of that with collection costs and real estate holding costs, I would find any number under $100 billion in losses unrealistic.
September 12, 2008 — 12:48 pm
Tom Vanderwell says:
David,
One wonders if they will continue to underwrite geography?
I just got a program change reducing loan to values for jumbos and lot loans FOR MICHIGAN PROPERTIES ONLY.
Outside of Florida, that’s the first I’ve seen that from “my” bank.
Tom
September 12, 2008 — 1:48 pm
David Shafer says:
Michael,
A 5% default rate on conforming loans? God, help us if that happens! And then according to you the loss is total so the underlying value of the real estate is $0?
Your numbers make no sense, but if they did remember $100 billion is less than 1/10th what we have spent on the current war! Yes, the bond investors have snapped up the debt because the US is now backing it, but that is exactly what everyone wanted to happen! The real problem is the servicing of that debt when profits dissapear!
September 12, 2008 — 7:56 pm