Well, it’s Friday again, everyone is back in school, my 18 year old is off to college (only 35 minutes away but still) and the mortgage world keeps moving on. So what’s this week look like? Well, frankly there were a couple of other things going on, but the main thing that happened was jobs this week. Which jobs? The ones that were getting cut and the ones that John and Sarah are running for (yes I am going to talk about politics!)
First, the jobs that are getting cut. The August employment numbers came out and they were frankly quite dismal. We lost 84,000 jobs in August and both June and July’s numbers were revised downward. In addition to that, the unemployment rate jumped upward to 6.1%, the highest level in, I believe, 5 years. The numbers were not only bad, they were worse than the markets had expected and that has correspondingly renewed the use of the “R” word (not Republican, recession) and has reduced the fear of inflation. The silver lining in that dark cloud is that mortgage rates have benefited this week. The dark side is that there are a lot more people out of work.
So what does that mean? Let’s focus on the “obvious” first:
1. It means that there are very few if any employers who are expanding right now. I’ve heard discussions that in order to handle the growth in our society, we need to create an additional 100,000 plus jobs every month. We aren’t even close to that number. So that’s not a good sign for the overall economic picture.
2. It’s probably also a byproduct of the fact that the credit crunch is moving from just being a subprime mortgage problem to being a mortgage problem to being an overall credit problem. Why is that so? If you were a business owner who was looking to expand but can’t borrow the money needed to expand, it is going to be harder to hire more people. It’s a vicious cycle, know what I mean?
3. If more people are afraid of losing their jobs, then more people are going to eat at McDonalds rather than Applebees and put off spending any extra money that they can. This in turn causes other employers to see lower sales and therefore be less inclined to hire more people or even keep the same staff. Which therefore causes more people to be afraid for their jobs……
Essentially, here’s the way I see it. We still don’t know exactly where or when the end of this credit crunch is going to show up. We don’t know how bad it’s going to get, how many loans are going to go under, how many banks are going to take major hits to their financial picture, how tight credit is going to become and how hard it’s going to be to get a loan. Until we can establish that, we aren’t going to have the opportunity to establish a bottom in housing, start working off inventory and start turning things around. Are there signs that we might be close to that? Jeff Brown and I have been discussing that at great length and yes there are some of the reports that have come out lately that MIGHT be showing a start to the kind of numbers that we need to have to see a bottom to this. Manufacturing Index numbers, some home sales statistics, the rate of price declines have all shown a “glimmer” of hope, but it’s too early to tell whether they really are improvements or they are merely seasonal or otherwise “blips” in the numbers. Time will tell.
Now for a few thoughts on the whole political situation and it’s ramifications on the markets. I’m going to admit to some gross stereotyping, so don’t write me back and accuse me of that since I’m already admitting it. Here’s my take on it:
1. At the end of last week, the Democrats had their “shining” moment and got a lot of good press on their convention. The markets (the Wall Street ones) tend to favor the Republicans rather than the Democrats because of the “deregulation/lower taxes vs. the tax and spend” issues. So that markets weren’t that happy looking at a very charismatic Democratic ticket vs. an “old guy” for the Republicans.
2. Then the Republicans made a very bold (to say the least) move and picked Alaska Governor Sarah Palin for the VP spot. Sarah who? I have to say that I did actually know who she was because I had read something about her, but she wasn’t well known by any means. So suddenly, there were a lot of people wondering, “Oh great, what did John do now? Did he blow everything?”
3. Then Wednesday night roles around, and Governor Palin delivers what was literally the speech of her life. She was articulate, candid, honest, funny and also had the “right” amount of aggressiveness. Suddenly, John McCain is looking like a lot wiser of a Senator than he was looking just a few days before.
So what does that have to do with the bond markets? Like I said before, Wall St. tends to like the impact that a Republican administration can have on the markets and suddenly we’re looking at a situation where there’s a much better chance of a Republican president and a much more invigorated campaign. Is it a coincidence that this happens at the same time that we see the lowest mortgage rates we’ve had in months? I don’t think so. Is it the only reason? Nope. But what do you think?
Until next time…..
Thanks!
Tom Vanderwell
Quote of the week: “What’s the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull? Lipstick!” Vice Presidential candidate and Governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin, Wednesday, September 3, 2008
David Shafer says:
Ahhh. Tom, don’t you think the mortgage bond market reacts to threats of inflation rather than the day-to-day political intrigue? I mean, whatever inflation pressures might have been apparent have just dissapeared, like full employment and rapidly increasing oil prices. Just a thought????
September 5, 2008 — 1:53 pm
Tom Vanderwell says:
David,
Those are definitely impacting it too, but the prices that oil is at now were thought to be outrageously high only 8 months ago, so that can’t be all of it.
I didn’t say that it was the only influencing factor, but I do think that market sentiment plays a factor. Not as much as the solid numbers but it does play a factor.
As a friend of mine likes to say, “That, and $4.50 will get you a cup of coffee!”
Tom
September 5, 2008 — 2:03 pm
Sean Purcell says:
Well the devil must have icicles hanging from his nose. For the first time I cannot disagree with your sour outlook. Of the many things we enjoy disagreeing on, unemployment is not one of them. Employment numbers are the key to this economy and this latest report does not bode well at all.
Scarier still was a recent report I saw that discussed a local job loss of 16,000 people – the vast majority coming out of real estate, mortgages, construction and housing related industries. More than half of those found other jobs so the loss of a little under 8000 people from our industry sounded about right: they moved to where ever they came from before they came here to pan for gold. But here is the scary part: 2/3 of the new jobs were in government sector positions. In other words, these people went from being net tax contributors to being net tax users. If that is going on at a national level we have an exponentially growing problem.
Speaking of national level, I have to throw one or two digs back to you or this just wouldn’t feel like a Friday. 🙂
I guess we are less concerned with Fannie & Freddie now… I see they got no mention on what I thought was a weekly death watch.
Also, I think you might be giving the markets (and Republicans) a little less than their due. You said:
and there is more to it than just tax and spend issues. The markets, generally speaking, are the last true picture of truth. Politcal rhetoric and University theory aside, “the markets” show you what works and what doesn’t based on the flow of their own money. The markets react more favorably to Republican economic strategies not just because of tax and spend issues but because of success vs. failure issues.
Great post… hope the devil doesn’t catch cold!
September 5, 2008 — 4:02 pm
Tom Vanderwell says:
Sean,
You’re right, it wouldn’t feel like a Friday otherwise, and I enjoy and look forward to them. A couple of thoughts back:
It’s ironic that one hour after I posted this the news started swirling that Paulson and Bernanke are going to pull the trigger this weekend on Fannie and Freddie. Going to make an interesting weekend!
I said early in my part about politics that I was stereotyping about the Dems and Republicans. The characterization that I said was my attempt to clarify a difference in as few of words as possible (it was already getting to be a long post!) Thanks for saying it so well.
Tom
September 5, 2008 — 4:56 pm
Jim Cosgrove says:
I wish I could afford to take my family to McDonalds! It’s going to be a tough winter for us RE Brokers.
September 6, 2008 — 6:07 am