I had a house close yesterday, and there was a little incident as I was trading keys with the buyers that I found instructive.
Back story: These folks came to me through my Arizona Republic column. That column produces almost no business for us, and I don’t milk it for business. But the clients it brings out are invariably very interesting, and they often bring with them multiple transactions. This particular family will do two listings and one purchase, and it was the purchase that closed yesterday.
They had started out thinking in terms of $800,000 homes in very tony desert locations. There are health issues, so I suggested that a smaller home closer to town might work better. We ended up buying a very nice home that comped for $425,000.
They were willing to risk losing the home in order to make sure they weren’t overpaying, so we offered $335,000 — $90,000 under two recent comp sales. We got that price, and the seller didn’t flinch at our repair requests. A fun, painless transaction, my kind of deal.
But wait. Didn’t I betray my sacred duty to milk the consumer for every last penny? I talked myself out of a commission on $800,000, then talked myself down again to a commission on $335,000. I don’t even think that way. I got a smokin’ deal for my buyers, and we all had fun every step of the way.
Because we’re doing multiple sides, we gave them a break on all three commissions. They didn’t ask, we just did it. Commission is always the elephant in the room, so, no matter what we plan to do, we always raise the issue first.
Why? Because doing the right thing is always the right thing to do, no matter what.
But also: Because affecting to ignore the elephant in the room only serves to make you look oily, evasive and corrupt — and the other party can use your presumptive corruption as leverage against you.
I believe that we do well by doing good — that consistent virtue reaps commensurate rewards in the long run. But even if we don’t, doing the right thing is always the right thing to do, no matter what.
This is the language I wrote in the Buyer Broker Agreement — to protect the buyers’ interests:
Sales commission will be paid to Buyer’s Broker as follows: Two-thirds of co-brokerage fee, up to 3% of Full Purchase Price, exclusive of any bonuses. One-third of co-brokerage fee plus 100% of any bonuses plus 100% of all co-brokerage fees in excess of 3% of Full Purchase Price will be refunded to Buyer at Close of Escrow. In no event will compensation to Buyer’s Broker exceed 2% of Full Purchase Price, with any other commissions or bonuses to be credited to Buyer.
That’s mind-numbingly redundant, but it’s completely unambiguous, which is the point of writing things that way.
Here’s the cool part: This home offered a 4% co-broke. We don’t ever take bonuses, and we had explained that in our first interview, as a part of our discussion about commissions. I had pointed out the bonus commission when we were looking at the house, both as a matter of disclosure and as a potential incentive to the buyer: Instead of one point from us, you’ll be getting two points on this house.
But they had forgotten every bit of that. Last night when I was taking my leave from the home, Mr. Buyer shook my hand and said, “I wanted to thank you for getting that extra money for us.” Simple enough, and I hadn’t thought twice about it. But the look in his eyes was startling, not just gratitude but something close to wonder. What he was really saying to me, I think, was something like this: “You could have cheated us and we would have been none the wiser.”
And that’s probably true. The language of the contract is painfully plain, but only high-C’s read contracts. They might have gone through the rest of their lives with nagging doubts about my integrity, but it’s completely plausible that they never would have figured it out, had I stolen half the commission I had promised to concede to them. They were only expecting a point, so if they only got a point, they might never have raised a fuss.
But that is why we must always be scrupulously honest, no matter what. If I know there’s an elephant in the room, I can do what I can to shoot it down. But, if by my own shady behavior, I invite elephants into the room, I am not just destroying my relationship with a nice family, I am wreaking permanent devastation on my own integrity, I am destroying myself from the inside out.
I like to watch people when they don’t know I’m watching, just to see them, just to see what they do. We say that your true character is who you are when you think no one is watching you. But the actual, ontological fact of human life is this: Evil is never unwitnessed. Even if no one else sees your evil act, even if no one else ever discovers it, you know what you have done. Your own knowledge of your own corruption — your own constant struggle to portray a virtue you know without doubt that you have betrayed — will eat you up from the inside out.
This is all completely obvious to everyone, and my peculiar gift to humanity is to raise the topics almost no one wants to talk — or even think — about. But if Realtors are ever to rise above our awful reputation, it will be my means of the kind of radical, pre-emptive transparency that leaves no possible room for doubt, in our clients’ minds, about our fundamental integrity.
Do you want to build relationships based on enduring trust? Shoot every elephant in the room, even the ones no one else has even noticed yet.
Technorati Tags: real estate, real estate marketing
Gary Frimann says:
Grag,
Absolutely fantastic article. I am going to share it with all my agents. With all the bad news out there and people scorning at real estate agents, this story was welcomed. Good job. I hope you get a ton of business from this client’s friends, relatives, co-workers,family, etc. Keep track of the word-of-mouth and let us know in a year or so. Good luck out there.
August 20, 2008 — 5:51 am
Tom Vanderwell says:
All I can say is that I wish there were a lot more agents and lenders who thought like you do.
Hat’s off to you for this one Greg, well said.
Tom
August 20, 2008 — 5:56 am
jim canion says:
It is unclear to me why charging a particular commission
becomes stealing from the client. As long as you agreed on a fee up front even if there was a “bonus” amount involved you could have taken the extra point if it was
justified in this situation(which from your account it seems to be).This would be a good time for Kelman to start contributing but he would probably say even your 2% was stealing, that you were only entitled to 1% OR LESS.The point being that you seem to be attributing dishonesty to any commission over 3%. Dishonesty is when you do nothing to earn your fee but get in the way and show up at closing to collect.
August 20, 2008 — 5:56 am
Beth Incorvati says:
Scared duty, or SACRED duty? 🙂
August 20, 2008 — 6:36 am
Greg Swann says:
> Scared duty, or SACRED duty?
Oops. Fixed. Thanks.
August 20, 2008 — 6:39 am
Greg Swann says:
> It is unclear to me why charging a particular commission
becomes stealing from the client.
That’s not what this post is about. We make it plain that we earn our fees. The point is keeping your promises even when you might be able to get away with stealing. If you keep change for tolls in your car’s ashtray (what’s that?), it should still be there when you drive away from the car wash. Character is how you behave even when you can “get away” with behaving badly.
> if there was a “bonus” amount involved you could have taken the extra point if it was justified in this situation
My belief is that a bonus commission is intended to induce the buyer’s agent to violate the buyer’s interests in the seller’s behalf. We concede all bonus commissions to the buyer, and we disclose them when we show. We never want for our buyers to question where our loyalties lie.
Incidentally, and as a matter of full disclosure, we are considering offering buyer’s agent’s bonuses on some listings — for exactly the reasons named above.
> The point being that you seem to be attributing dishonesty to any commission over 3%.
No. In the long run, our plan is to charge 4% on the listing side. We already earn it, but we charge less than that, for now, for marketing purposes.
This is all about being as perfectly honest as you can be — primarily for egoistic reasons, in the silence and solitude of your own mind. But as Gary points out, there can be salutary secondary consequences from behaving this way. But even if these people never refer another soul, I’m a happy man. I helped very sweet people get exactly what they wanted, I got paid handsomely, and I know that I did everything I could have and should have done to the highest attainable standards.
Please understand, I’m not boasting. I’m trying to illustrate what the world looks like when the dial is set to “normal.” If I get my way, no one will ever expect anything less from real estate professionals.
August 20, 2008 — 6:59 am
Beth Incorvati says:
Greg, this is a great post – but then again most of your posts are. I share them frequently with the agents I am coaching, as there are few high minded, out of the box practitioners for them to model in our area.
Just a thank you – and please, keep ’em coming! 🙂
August 20, 2008 — 7:08 am
Greg Swann says:
> keep ‘em coming!
Bless you. Thank you. The world is a fascinating place right now: We suddenly have the power to share ideas about how to do our work better — both practically and ethically — and, at the same time, the whole world is up for grabs. At the local level, market turmoil has made it much easier for better ideas to grab mind share. And at the national level, we have the chance to undermine what seem to me to be criminally anti-consumer practices. I love to think that we can remake our industry over the next decade or two.
August 20, 2008 — 7:24 am
John Kalinowski says:
Greg, I’ve played with bonuses before, but always get a little scared about the best way to handle the payment to the buyer. Did they actually receive a check at closing for the amount you gave back? Is it true that lenders sometimes won’t allow this? Is it actually on the HUD? Have you ever just written the buyer a check after closing, or do you always do it through escrow?
I’d like to do more of what you’re describing, but the mechanics of how to handle the rebate always worry me.
August 20, 2008 — 8:38 am
St. George commercial real estate says:
I think that is exactly why people need realtors when looking to purchase a home. You did exactly what a real estate agent is supposed to do and that is look out for the clients best interest.
Good Job!
August 20, 2008 — 8:42 am
genuine chirs johnson says:
Being honest for selfish, free market reasons is why i wanted to be here when I was new to the RE.NET. It’s plain that it serves your long term best interests because quality people have developed (because it’s been made necessary) a very acute bullshit detector.
Being immune to that is worth it’s weight in gold.
August 20, 2008 — 8:43 am
Greg Swann says:
> Being immune to that is worth it’s weight in gold.
Not only that, but, even when you sleep alone, you get to wake up with someone you like and admire. 😉
August 20, 2008 — 8:55 am
Matt Caldwell says:
In this time of financial hardship, It is the basic integrity you have that sets yourself above the dirt on the floor.
August 20, 2008 — 9:06 am
Greg Swann says:
> I’d like to do more of what you’re describing, but the mechanics of how to handle the rebate always worry me.
We do everything through title — and I mean even the smallest stuff. At the RESPA level, commission rebates are completely kosher. Some state laws forbid them under their Dinosaur Protection Act. I can’t imagine the lender objecting unless the commission were being used like a gift for the mandated portion of the down payment. On new builds, I have conceded 6%, perhaps even more, and no one blinked.
August 20, 2008 — 9:19 am
Bob says:
Greg, I do this with relo referrals. I ask that the agent give that amount equal to the referral back to the buyer. Sometimes it doesn’t happen per state law (Idaho was the most recent), but there are legal workarounds.
On bonuses, I always disclose those to the buyer and we always have a legal workaround to get that to the buyer.
August 20, 2008 — 11:23 am
Sean Purcell says:
Greg,
As great as this post is, my favorite line comes from your comment:
This is all about being as perfectly honest as you can be — primarily for egoistic reasons, in the silence and solitude of your own mind.
Amen.
August 20, 2008 — 11:54 am
Teri Lussier says:
>I know that I did everything I could have and should have done to the highest attainable standards.
>I’m trying to illustrate what the world looks like when the dial is set to “normal.”
Sad that it needs to be discussed at all, but that is as it is.
Brilliant post, Greg. Real ideas we can use that will benefit everyone.
August 20, 2008 — 12:01 pm
Vance Shutes says:
Greg,
>”Because doing the right thing is always the right thing to do, no matter what.”
That says it all. Integrity – what a concept!
August 20, 2008 — 12:42 pm
Geno Petro says:
Great post. The best way to overcome an objection is to anticipate it. Clearing the air (and the room) of all commissionable elephants is wise as even if the $$ subject does not appear to be an issue, elephants never, as they say, forget.
August 20, 2008 — 1:18 pm
Mike says:
I think the fact you weren’t showing them just $800,000 goes a long way.
I picked up a client from across the country who was pissed at her now previous agent for misrepresenting a property that they flew out here to buy. The condo didn’t take large dogs, which she had two, but they had really nice upgrades the agent had told her. Oops.
Her price range was $400,000 to $700,000. I found 3 under $400k , 4 in the $400k range and some above. She told me the previous agent couldn’t find her anything for less than $500k. She bought at $425,000.
That honesty goes a long way.
August 20, 2008 — 1:37 pm
Relocating Again says:
I think this is great article. It emphasize the importance of having a good agent and that they actually exist.
August 20, 2008 — 3:29 pm
Carolyn Gjerde-Tu says:
In the long run truthfulness and follow through will win out. I can just imagine that you will get many referrals from a customer who knows you kept your word.
August 20, 2008 — 3:56 pm
Dave says:
Being honest for selfish, free market reasons is why i wanted to be here when I was new to the RE.NET. It’s plain that it serves your long term best interests because quality people have developed (because it’s been made necessary) a very acute bullshit detector.
Either I don’t understand that comment, or it’s a really sad comment to make.
August 20, 2008 — 4:51 pm
genuine chirs johnson says:
@Dave Being honest serves your best interests. It’s a fact, but maybe not the reason to be honest. Capitalism distributes wealth most equitibally, but it’s not the reason for it.
August 20, 2008 — 8:10 pm
Galen says:
I’m not normally a “good poster,” but good post, Greg.
August 20, 2008 — 11:26 pm
James Boyer South Orange NJ says:
interesting dealings Greg, Such a deal would be a good way to get into big trouble here in New Jersey. Rebating is strictly forbidden.
August 21, 2008 — 6:17 pm
Tan Girl says:
I would think that your integrity will be part of the reputation that grows for you. Sure, there will be negative implications by those who disagree with you, but overall you will be the success!
August 21, 2008 — 9:16 pm
Dave says:
@Genuine,
Fair enough.
August 22, 2008 — 4:32 am
Sue says:
What a great article. It certainly reflects character and integrity and you truly put the needs of the client first. By the way you describe the look he gave you I am sure he will remember you for future transactions and referrals.
August 23, 2008 — 5:44 am