Back in the 19th century, when the stodgy New York Stock Exchange was already ensconced in the lap of luxury, the traders who would one day form the American Stock Exchange were stuck out in the rain.
Literally. Stock brokerages that couldn’t afford a seat on the NYSE instead rented offices on either side of Broad Street near Exchange Place. Clerks hanging out of windows would communicate bid and ask prices by hand signals to the traders working outside on Broad Street. Rain, sleet or snow, the traders effected their exchanges.
Last Summer I poked fun at Zillow.com’s CEO Rich Barton for a vision he had of a 19th century marketplace. This is Barton’s quote:
“I see an old-style marketplace formed, a city market like Pike Place Market. I actually dug up an old photo — Pike Place Market at the turn of the last century. People were gesticulating. People were buying things. People were gossiping. Negotiations were happening. Big billboards were advertising things above the marketplace. That’s the picture I have in my head.”
Give the man his due. I’m thinking Zillow’s Mortgage Marketplace is more like Broad Street than the Pike Place Market, but it definitely is a true bourse — the maximum flow of information between buyers and sellers with the minimum of friction — or even overhead!
I wrote last month that Zillow.com is leading us toward the realization of Capitalism’s promise. Everything we claim as a defect of Capitalism is in fact the confluence of two other systemic defects:
First, a small few people want to behave badly, which fact permits other sleazy people to malign honest traders who are themselves innocent of all wrong-doing.
And second, physical impediments to the flow of information prevent the overwhelming majority of overwhelmingly honest people from distinguishing the innocents from the crooks.
Software systems like Ebay and Zillow’s Mortgage Marketplace mitigate the second defect, leaving the bad actors fewer and fewer places to hide.
The Mortgage Marketplace is a small thing, so far, and, as with everything in the RE.net world, it looks much larger to us than it really is. But consumers — and lenders! — have choices today they didn’t have yesterday.
Lenders will have to compete fiercely to get the business, but the competition is not all about rates. Zillow’s reputation management system will give the best performers a strong advantage, and there is room all through the process for good salesmanship to work its magic.
And consumers now have a one-stop-shop to discover everything they need to know about obtaining a mortgage — with true apples-to-apples comparability.
Are abuses possible? No doubt.
Are abuses likely? Probably less so than by any other means of connecting borrowers and lenders.
Will abusive behavior persist through time? Only if Zillow goes over to The Dark Side.
In other words, if Zillow.com steadfastly enforces its own Code of Conduct, persistent systemic abuses of consumers will be impossible, and the bad actors will be banned from Zillow’s free leads system forever.
All that and no one has to stand out in the rain on Broad Street!
Technorati Tags: disintermediation, real estate, real estate marketing, technology, Zillow.com
louis@homegain.com says:
I love how people are calling this “new” and a RE.net feature or 2.0.
HomeGain has had this type of market place for real estate agents since 1999
http://blog.homegain.com/homegain-cries-flattery-zillow
April 3, 2008 — 10:44 am
Greg Swann says:
Louis, when you’re counting all the way from “no cost” to “free leads”, where are you getting lost? 😉
April 3, 2008 — 11:10 am
Louis Cammarosano says:
I suppose I am getting lost in running a business for a profit.
April 3, 2008 — 11:11 am
Greg Swann says:
> I suppose I am getting lost in running a business for a profit.
If you’re looking for a cheap shot, the ammunition is in my second post from last night. I promise you that the King of Sleaze at Sellsius won’t miss it.
Among the many Web 2.0 innovations we can find in Zillow’s business model, the monetization strategy is fascinating.
April 3, 2008 — 11:14 am
Selling a home in Richmond Hill says:
Yes you are right ….. Zillow is really superb site
April 3, 2008 — 11:32 am
Louis Cammarosano says:
Greg
Why do you assume that I am looking for a cheap shot?
Is it because I am not fascinated by the same things that fascinate you (although I think we have some common interests for sure)?
And we still owe each other beers from a while back.
At HomeGain the allure is in satisfying our customers and making a profit.
We just don’t have $87 million in Venture Capital money to do experiments with to fascinate the RE.net crowd.
HOWEVER, you will probably be slightly surprised with what we come out with in the coming months…
April 3, 2008 — 7:00 pm
Greg Swann says:
> Why do you assume that I am looking for a cheap shot?
My read on you is that you seek to minimize bright-line distinctions while exaggerating minor implementation details.
Like this:
“HomeGain has had this forever [except it costs money, a bright line distinction], but we had it years ago [minor implementation detail].”
That much is your business, and I do applaud you for engaging the enraged while you are retooling your product.
But: If your reaction to Zillow’s mortgage offering truly was a “YAWN!” — your investors should have you committed.
The entire lead-vending world changed last night. We both know it.
April 3, 2008 — 7:11 pm
Louis Cammarosano says:
Greg
When Zillow came out with its instant home valuation tool, Fortune call it a “revolution”.
The tool is very passe now (as much so as when Zillow first launched it six years after HomeGain did).
If Zillow can’t afford to support its next lead vending venture, the revolution will be called off for lack of funds.
BTW “my” original investors were Technology Crossover Ventures. They sold HomeGain to Classified Ventures in 2005 and a few months later dropped some money in Zillow. So its no surprise to see Zillow recycle a few old HomeGain ideas.
April 3, 2008 — 7:18 pm
Greg Swann says:
> If Zillow can’t afford to support its next lead vending venture, the revolution will be called off for lack of funds.
That’s why god made auctioneers. The ideas will live on. The Attic Greeks are long gone, but you and I both are their champions.
April 3, 2008 — 7:23 pm
Louis Cammarosano says:
Greg
Some ideas do become abandoned if they do not prove fruitful.
Speaking of Attic Greeks
Anyone still praying to Zeus? Apollo? Aphrodite? Demeter?
Some ideas just fade away. Pointcast anyone?
April 3, 2008 — 7:26 pm
Louis Cammarosano says:
Greg would like you thoughts on a comment I left on FOREM:
Joel wrote
“taking my info and then selling it on (as a lead) to the highest bidder. That business model should be taken out behind the woodshed, shot and disposed of appropriately, in my opinion.”
How is that different than taking your information and then pimping it out to advertisers?
Both models result in a direct sale of the consumers information.
In the rush to praise the “transparency” that Zillow is bestowing upon us, I think we are missing as Joe over at
Sellsius noted- Zillow has become a Lead Seller, plain and simple.
http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/zillowcom/zillow-mortgage-marketplace-is-lead-generator-for-mortgage-lenders/2008/04/03/
Whether Zillow claims its ‘free’ or ‘transparent’ they are still selling leads, just with a different model.
So while you are busy taking lead generation models outback for assassination, keep some bullets ready for Zillow’s new lead generation model.
April 6, 2008 — 7:58 am