A tiny trophy, a huge victory — to come.
We had a helluva week last week, our best ever — until now. So what did we do this week to top last week’s numbers? How about almost double?
The real estate category on BlogTopSites is the home of truly competitive real estate webloggers. We’ve always held our own there — the respectable low teens until lately, in the higher single digits so far for 2008. The top of the list has almost always been dominated by bubble blogs, but BloodhoundBlog has been among the top RE.net blogs — and almost always first among real estate industry weblogs — for quite some while.
But we’ve never been first overall before, and the chances are good that we won’t be again, not for a while. But first place on that list is ours to earn and ours to keep — eventually. We deliver so much more content — so much better content — that we will own the top of that list in due course. Just not yet.
So what gives? How did we get to be number one at the start of this brand new week?
Earlier this week, Brian Brady gave us all a practical demonstration in how to dominate a Google search. On Thursday, he wrote a post about Ashley Alexandra Dupree that was first, fastest and best — from Google’s point of view. He’s spent the past three days on the first page of Google for a number of Ashley Dupree-related search terms — sitting squarely atop major news organizations and A-list webloggers. As I write this, Brian’s post is second for ashley dupree — and first place is off-topic.
So what happened? With that first Ashley Dupree post and a follow-up about Ashley’s singing career, Brian by himself brought over 14,000 unique souls as hard clicks into BloodhoundBlog this week. He beat all of last week by himself. Yesterday we had over 8,132 unique visitors, of which at last 6,000 were brought here by Brian Brady alone.
Yeah, but, but, but– It’s just an SEO trick. No, it’s not. It’s an SEO demonstration. Brian Brady has been paying attention, and he made a small demonstration of how his careful attention has paid off.
Okay, let that simmer for a moment while we think about something else.
Earlier today, someone known only as Jacksonville Real Estate posted a comment on my post about using low-tech promotional schemes to bring traffic to a single-property web site:
It’s an old idea and it’s not mine … but if you are targeting just a certain areas then getting your flyer on the local pizza delivery box can work wonders.
Brilliant! Never thought of it, but that’s why I love this place: We bring bright minds together and set off a blinding brilliance. My reply:
Oh, very cool. I tend to think in terms of things we can do on our own, but this is actually an interesting cross-promotion:
“Visit our custom web site for 123 Mulberry Lane and your next pizza is on us!”
Build a PDF coupon in the site and redeem them with the pizza joint once a week. Meanwhile, your contact info is on the fridge for weeks or months.
That’s a Brian Brady-style idea. I must be channeling…
It’s a Guerrilla Marketing kind of idea, actually, a Duct Tape Marketing kind of idea — maximum bang for minimum bucks. It’s most completely a BloodhoundBlog kind of idea, in the sense that it combines (and recombines) physical with online marketing.
But nothing’s perfect in the first draft. My correspondent thought springing for the whole pizza might be too expensive as a “pay per click.”
Okayfine. How about this?
Buy the soda instead, then. It’s an upsell for the pizzeria — bigger mark-up, and therefore often deferred. Your cost is down to maybe three bucks — only on redemption — for the most valuable real estate in the house, the front of the fridge. That’s a smokin’ deal, and you can turn it into a locals versus The Big Chains thing, too: We support Luigi’s because Luigi’s supports Littleton Heights. There’s a lot you can do with this.
Make them fill out the coupon prior to redemption, then take them all back from Luigi — and share your database with Luigi; he’ll love you for it. Then send two more coupons to everyone who uses one. Better yet, hand deliver them. Sales is getting belly-to-belly. Everything else is either prospecting or marketing.
Sales is getting belly-to-belly. That’s not news. The news is that I invented and perfected a hyper-local online/offline marketing strategy today — in my spare time.
Time spared from what? We’re writing content for BloodhoundBlog Unchained, and I shared this outline with Jeff Brown earlier tonight:
Day 1, Class 2: The Way of the Farmer, dominating the Long Tail to dominate your farm
Six 20-minute segments:
Segment 1 — Listing strong to farm strong
Segment 2 — Building single-property web sites
Segment 3 — Using engenu to dominate the long tail
Segment 4 — Zestifarming to dominate Zillow
Segment 5 — Blogging listings with engenu
Segment 6 — Belly-to-belly farming the Web 2.0 way
It’s the Way of the Bloodhound, really: Online marketing to build real-world relationships and real-world marketing to build online relationships. Jeff wants to know how to get online leads that don’t suck. My answer: Build your traffic belly-to-belly. We’re Realtors, lenders, investors. We’re not selling an online product. Our product is big, very tangible and completely immobile. Our online efforts are undertaken to produce our offline opportunities. To which Jeff might respond, “Well, duh!”
But here’s the true fact about the blog with the dog: My battle plan for BloodhoundBlog, all along, was to shoot straight to the top. This is from an email I sent earlier today:
When we went to a group blog, my target was Inman. I said nothing at the time, because the idea would have seemed ridiculous to anyone but me. But I knew we could pull away from the pack and make a run for the end-zone. We’re not there yet, but look at the trends:
There are three million people out there who are starving for the feast we can bring them. Wanna know my carefully-detailed strategy? Keep getting bigger. The rest will come of its own.
Never doubt my gratitude.
That goes for you, out there, too: Never doubt my gratitude. We’re nobody’s fan boy, nobody’s water boy, nobody’s pony boy. What we are is a big dog on our way to getting a lot bigger.
So take it apart:
- Who do you trust to help you put your weblog over the moon with Google?
- Who do you depend on to come up with radical new marketing ideas — sometimes on the fly?
- Who else do you know who will come up with online marketing strategies to help you sell your decidedly offline product?
- Who do you know in the entire world who could look at a dinky little mom-and-pop real estate brokerage weblog and know with an icy certainty that it could take on the entire real estate industry — and win?
How do I know that we’re going to seize that number one position and hold it as our own, week after week?
That’s easy. We’re going to earn it. We are good writers with very good business, technology and marketing ideas. But BloodhoundBlog is good theater, too — as fascinating to me as to anyone. Untamed, unbent, unbowed, undaunted, unintimidated, unrelenting, unstoppable. Unchained.
The next time that little chicklet says we’re number one — we’ll be number one for keeps.
Technorati Tags: blogging, BloodhoundBlog Unchained, disintermediation, Inman, real estate, real estate marketing, real estate training, technology
Brian Brady says:
That’s pretty cool!
I wrote the post because I was fascinated by the unraveling story vis a vis the MySpace connection. To say I ignored it’s Googlicious nature would be a lie.
I will point out (to our readers) that this wasn’t an SEO trick. I’ve been spending hours, each night, preparing for Unchained, by listening to podcasts on Duct Tape Marketing, Guerrilla Marketing Minutes, Integral Impressions, Tech PR War Stories and Search Engine Guide. There’s a ton of good advice out there.
The follow up post about Ashley is the hidden lesson. It shows how we can capitalize on “lighting in a bottle moments” by acting quickly. The Ashley posts did just that.
Were the keywords a “trick”? Some may call it that but I think the content is what kept us high in Google search. It was an analysis of the unfolding story, as it relates to Web 2.0, that kept visitors coming back.
Now, critics will say that 13,000 of the 14,000 hard clicks clicked through to her MySpace profile. That’s correct…BUT…
…we had a lot of click-throughs to other places- a bunch to Unchained (which is fabulous).
I want to be clear about one thing, here. I LEARNED this stuff…learned it, by listening to PR professionals, on podcasts. I immerse myself in this stuff, nightly. If I can learn this, anyone can.
March 16, 2008 — 12:19 am
Greg Swann says:
My carefully considered response to Brian’s thoughtful deliberations:
March 16, 2008 — 12:36 am
Brad Coy says:
Congrats Bloodhounds! and great timing. Right in the middle of weekend update – SNL. Your tweet must have woke me up.
> We deliver so much more content — so much better content —
Indeed. Keep up the great work.
Cheers
March 16, 2008 — 12:38 am
Brian Brady says:
Brilliant idea, Greg! A day early but bring on the craic.
March 16, 2008 — 12:42 am
Greg Swann says:
> Cheers
Indeed. I promised you better days, so here’s a virtual double. No driving, please. Good Irish Whiskey requires all your concentration. 😉
March 16, 2008 — 12:45 am
Bucking the Real Estate Trend says:
Thanks for the ideas and inspiration. Love your spunk, brilliance, and site.
Susie
March 16, 2008 — 4:04 am
Teri L says:
Holy cow! I’ve been left on the porch.
>The follow up post about Ashley is the hidden lesson.
>I think the content is what kept us high in Google search.
I completely, utterly, and thoroughly missed the Ashlee DuPree lightning-in-a-bottle approach. It’s such a “duh” idea, but not until you see it, and I couldn’t see it.
Thanks Brian and Greg for sharing this.
Obviously it’s time for me pick up the pace so I can *really* start running with the big dogs.
March 16, 2008 — 6:48 am
Dave Barnes says:
A silly contest/ranking as “you will be only ranked if you add the ranking HTML to your blog.”
March 16, 2008 — 6:52 am
Louis Cammarosano says:
Nice Work Brian!
Its interesting that Ashlee’s middle name is spelled Alexander not Alexandra as brian spelled it.
The latter misspelling puts Brian at number one on Google.
The whole ranking thing is a little foolish, given you have to include your site on Blogflux to be ranked and not all sites have desired to do so (and from the relatively low numbers reported by Blogflux you should be happy that a few well visited sites have not done so)
I prefer Mike’s endorsement of the Bloodhound blog-the true value of the BHB is its content not its rankings by some opt in counting site.
March 16, 2008 — 8:59 am
Sean Purcell says:
Congratulations to Greg
Congratulations to BHB Contributors
Congratulations to BHB Commenters
Most of all: Congratulations to every one of us that reads, uses, argues over, disagrees with and loves BHB. We get the real world fruits of their labor.
March 16, 2008 — 9:17 am
JeffX says:
I’m not here to ‘kick the dog’…just make a comment and a point or two.
“With that first Ashley Dupree post and a follow-up about Ashley’s singing career, Brian by himself brought over 14,000 unique souls as hard clicks into BloodhoundBlog this week”
Thats over half your weekly traffic.
It doesn’t seem all that long ago that:
https://www.bloodhoundrealty.com/BloodhoundBlog/?p=1701
referred to such acts as a ‘sleazy’…
I suppose one could make the argument that 97% of 14,000 people who clicked through to this article bounced in <5 seconds.
My opinion is the same today as it was then…If you can achieve and maintain traffic that turns into business and success, good for you.
I can appreciate Brians article as he (cleverly) walked the right side of the line, spinning it into a lesson on marketing…keyword stuffing just to lure someone onto your site then offering little in the way of relevance, is annoying and a waste of time.
Given BHB’s PR5, the nicely tuned title (phrasing it in the form of a natural Search question: Where’s Ashley Dupree’s MySpace?), Brian’s post placement on Google is not surprising.
There have been a few articles written about (and dismissing) Paradigm Shifting in real estate lately (including yours truly). One from a BloodHound author (another bald guy) feels that in order for something to be deemed a ‘Paradigm Shift’, the 4th dimension needs to be discovered or cars will be able go Back to the Future using a flux capacitor. In fact a change in paradigm need only require a change in the basic assumptions of proven/given rule(s).
If 14,000 unique visitors to a real estate website from an article referencing a hookers MySpace site doesn’t demonstrate that basic assumptions on effective (good, bad or otherwise) marketing have changed, then I don’t know what does.
March 16, 2008 — 11:28 am
John Wake says:
#1 is cool… but come on… those were garbage clicks.
I once had a page that got a huge unexpected and consistent amount of traffic. This was no lightning in a bottle.
It turned out that on that page a woman’s surname was also, in Italian, the name of a (pair) of female body parts. Interesting but those clicks from Italian men looking for photos of naked women were of absolutely no value to me.
March 16, 2008 — 1:44 pm
Brian Brady says:
Question for John Wake.
If what Jeff Corbett says is correct:
“I suppose one could make the argument that 97% of 14,000 people who clicked through to this article bounced in <5 seconds.”
Is 420 new readers, in 3 days, good?
(actually, Jeff, the number was closer to 90%; we had click-throughs going all over the site)
March 16, 2008 — 3:03 pm
JeffX says:
“My opinion is the same today as it was then…If you can achieve and maintain traffic that turns into business and success, good for you.”
Congrats Brian…I ‘get it’, have for awhile now 🙂
March 16, 2008 — 3:24 pm
Brian Brady says:
“Congrats Brian…I ‘get it’, have for awhile now ”
OMG, yes. You are the original “eyeball marketer”, Jeff. Your congratulations is like Ted Williams congratulating Tony Gwynn. I’m honored.
March 16, 2008 — 4:09 pm
JeffX says:
lol
I wouldn’t go quite that far, but thank you 🙂
March 16, 2008 — 4:14 pm
Jeff Kempe says:
Damn. I hate being a contrarian, but, Brian (and Greg), some serious questions since I just don’t get it:
1. Ashley Dupre spells her name with one ‘e’. Google “Ashley Dupre” and your post doesn’t show up among the 1,600,000 hits. Spelling it correctly you’d be going up against the major wire services and all the major blogs, so strictly in the SEO sense it probably was more effective with the misspelling. Was that intentional?
2. I posted a YouTube last week of Paul Potts – the winner of Britain’s Got Talent – apropos of nothing having to do with real estate but because I really like people who do things well. (I’m learning; note the cleverly embedded link.) I’m still getting hits from all over Europe and Australia. None have converted. BHB got 14,000 hits from voyeurs who can’t spell. In both cases: What was accomplished?
3. If the answer in (2) is some will stay – and that’s certainly possible; I’m sure there are RE voyeurs: A) Aren’t you bringing people in under false pretenses, and isn’t that likely to annoy at least as many people as it captures? B) Isn’t targeted SEO – like targeted marketing in any medium – infinitely more efficient and effective? and C) Isn’t it also possible that there are those hard clicking to find out more about the fallacy of RE licensing, but instead find instructions to a hooker on how to make hay while the ‘I did a governor!’ sun is shining, so decide to leave and never come back?
4. Bloodhoundblog is built on excellence. As someone’s already said: isn’t this just a bit cynical and superficial? Doesn’t it detract?
Again, these are serious questions. I’m still learning!
March 16, 2008 — 4:40 pm
Greg Swann says:
> What was accomplished?
Proof of method. I didn’t know what Brian was doing at first, but, even so, I edited his first headline to make it more relevant to search engines. Later I made minor changes that took that post from ninth to sixth to second for ashley dupree. What did we gain? Knowledge. How does that convert? Hide and watch. 😉
March 16, 2008 — 5:04 pm
Louis Cammarosano says:
Another question-was it relevant traffic?
Type in “Real Estate Blog” or “Real Estate Blogs” on google and see what comes up.
Probably more relevant traffic than a search for “ashleee alaxnder dupree” or however you spell it.
Even if the traffic wasnt very relevant-you make it up in volume!
March 16, 2008 — 5:16 pm
Brian Brady says:
Okay, Jeff. The long answer:
1- I misspelled her name out of ignorance; it wasn’t intentional.
2- Converted to what? It’s naive to expect an instantaneous customer from one post. Relationship building requires you to get “found” first- you did that well.
3- I wrote this post to discuss how a current event was related to Web 2.0 because it was part of what we’ll be discussing at Unchained. I was curious to see how Ashley played it out. The follow up post showed the power of Web 2.0 to disintermediate slow models (music companies v. Amie Street).
(a)- Did I annoy people looking for the prurient peek by making them click once more to see her boobs? Eh. I don’t care; I don’t really want to talk to them. Did I capture people interested in Web 2.0 marketing? I think so. How often do we go on “searches” and find ourselves intrigued with the ancillary sites we find?
(b)- good question. I’d say…yes…BUT. Marketing can be a law of large numbers as well. If a targeted search begets 40 readers while a wide net captures 420, I’d say the larger net was more effective. Of course, you don’t build a business on this and this alone. Targeted SEO trumps the wide net as a matter of practice. Keep this in mind; I truly am intrigued by her story because it is a REALITY of the media world we live in. I didn’t go “trolling” for 14,000 hits; I thought it was a cool story.
(c) Yes. I think that number is awfully small. We are a real estate blog focused on technology and new media marketing. If we gain 400 new readers and lose three, I believe we win.
4. I submit that my analysis of how Web 2.0 was used in the unfolding Ashley Dupree story WAS excellent. The analogies were appropriate to our Web 2.0 world. The story is NOT in how I gamed Google (although that was interesting); it was how an unfortunate situation could be turned around, and promoted, to benefit her DESIRED career.
I don’t advocate prostitution but, as a marketer, I recognize the intuition some escorts have about customers. I don’t promote what The Mayflower Madam did as morally correct but I DO listen to her when she talks about marketing.
I am a student of marketing; I have been since my first class in Bartley Hall. I seek counsel from the strangest places because I recognize that our respective industries are horrible at it. I seek to learn, to refine, to perfect marketing; I’ll learn from Ashley, Gene Simmons, or Donald Trump. I’ll tweak their methods to align them to my needs.
The short answer? We can learn from some of the most unusual places.
March 16, 2008 — 5:22 pm
louis cammarosano says:
brian is right we can learn from many sources the intellectual and the non intellectual, web 2.0 and web 1.0, real estate marketing and other marketing.
there is no one way to market or attract visitors to your web site.
March 16, 2008 — 6:20 pm
Sean Purcell says:
I seek counsel from the strangest places because I recognize that our respective industries are horrible at it. I seek to learn, to refine, to perfect marketing; I’ll learn from Ashley, Gene Simmons, or Donald Trump. I’ll tweak their methods to align them to my needs.
Amen brother.
March 16, 2008 — 6:23 pm
John Wake says:
Brian,
The 14,000 clicks is a neat story. I like it.
You guess that you might gain 400 new readers. My guess is 0 but talk me out of it.
I’m trying to think of an indirect benefit. SEO-wise, perhaps Google would see all that traffic and… (well, I’m not coming up with anything). Is there some other non-SEO indirect benefit?
I would rather have 1.4 clicks from someone searching for “encanto realtor” than 14,000 from “ashley dupree.”
March 16, 2008 — 7:32 pm
Greg Swann says:
Ahem: Encanto-Palmcroft real estate specialists. We score on a number of others — from one post. I was doing something else entirely, but I wasn’t going to demonstrate good keyword usage with dummy keywords.
March 16, 2008 — 7:53 pm
Brian Brady says:
“My guess is 0 but talk me out of it.”
Laurie Manny.
I can’t PROVE that a correlation between more hits and more business exists other than to point to the law of large numbers- I just know that I’ve seen it happen.
Long tail searches are superior, without a doubt. I do know, however that higher traffic equals more business.
March 16, 2008 — 8:55 pm
Todd Carpenter says:
Early in lenderama’s life, my daily page views went from about 1,000 to 10,000. My Beginner Yahoo Web Hosting account went into implode. The traffic lasted for three days, and at the time, I admit that I wasn’t smart enough to immediately figure out why.
It was because Mariah Carey was in the news, and my domain name is mariah.com.
Honestly, I looked at that traffic as a liability. It means absolutely nothing. I don’t see BHB’s traffic here to be any different.
It makes an interesting proof of method argument, but how this strategy translates to regular Joe agent with a PR2 blog is what would have made this post far more interesting.
March 16, 2008 — 8:58 pm
Jeff Kempe says:
Brian, thank you! Cogent and instructive, as always, at least in the abstract.
But let’s step outside the abstract for a second:
First, this: I misspelled her name out of ignorance; it wasn’t intentional. obviates Greg’s entire post, unless the lesson is creative misspelling. There would have been no page one – or two or three or four – and no 14,000 additional clicks.
Second, I don’t think – again, outside the abstract – that it really matters. I agree with John Wake: the likelihood that someone come looking for bare breasts is going to stay and read a brilliant missive on paradigm shifts within the real estate industry approaches absolute zero.
[We can do an unscientific test: Would anyone whose first exposure to BHB came through a Google search on the post in question please speak up?]
Third, this is the father in me: Yes, this is an interesting story, and the relationship to 6 million hits on her web site certainly correlates to Web 2.0 marketing.
But. I hate the idea that, in the celebrity culture, kids are taught that the road to success is 1) Set up a MySpace page; 2) Do a governor for big bucks; 3) Get lots of hits on MySpace; and 4) Launch a singing career…without at least first being able to sing. Life starts with the singing; the rest is superficial follow-up.
When everyone’s through using her Ashley’s going to end up a NYT page 20 overdose afterthought…
March 16, 2008 — 9:34 pm
Greg Swann says:
> First, this: I misspelled her name out of ignorance; it wasn’t intentional. obviates Greg’s entire post, unless the lesson is creative misspelling. There would have been no page one – or two or three or four – and no 14,000 additional clicks.
That’s a rebuttable presumption. Brian is killing much bigger sites who also have the name spelled the way he did it. The most decisive issue, I think, is that he posted very early from a very strong weblog. Had he spelled the name correctly, he might well have crashed our server. We don’t know everything about how Google determines relevance, but we do know that they honor a hierarchy of canonicity.
For example, Brian’s first post about Ashley Dupré outscores his second post on Dupré and AmieStreet.com by about six to one in inbound hard clicks. (What am I doing? I’m telling Google that the two spellings are equivalent.)
Brian is first on ashley alexandria dupree and on ashley alexandra dupree, two different spellings of the middle name, both apparently wrong. We can’t unring the bell on this test, but it seems plausible to me that he would have scored very strongly had he spelled the name correctly.
Because this is a short-head phenomenon, timing is critical. For long-tail keywords, a high degree of relevance and regular repetition are going to matter a lot more. Even so, as I demonstrated in a comment above to John Wake, a single properly-written weblog post, even without the benefit of the title and heading tags, can achieve amazing long-tail results. (Interestingly, I’m also eighth on that search, even though Encanto-Palmcroft is hugely competitive in Phoenix. We have invested zero effort in dominating those SERPs — yet.)
This was a hugely instructive exercise. If anyone reading this can’t work out how to proceed with the keywords that are valuable to your own marketing, Brian will be exploring these issues again and again.
March 16, 2008 — 10:04 pm
Brian Brady says:
“But. I hate the idea that, in the celebrity culture, kids are taught that the road to success is 1) Set up a MySpace page; 2) Do a governor for big bucks; 3) Get lots of hits on MySpace; and 4) Launch a singing career…without at least first being able to sing. Life starts with the singing; the rest is superficial follow-up.”
I hate this, too, Jeff…BUT…I see the value of atonement. My first post was to recommend that Ash atone and get positive. My second is that she took action to make SOMETHING of this debacle. I would recommend both practices to any young lady who lost her way.
Not being able to sing? Again, while I agree with you, it’s a matter of opinion. Like it or not, marketing supercedes talent in the music biz, today. While I agree with you on many levels, I keep my eyes open to the Web 2.0 world.
Here’s the big picture: We (early adopters) often think we define how the RE.net will be shaped; I’ve NEVER believed that, Jeff. I think the forces of Web 2.0 will grow around us; I don’t want to miss this wave so I keep my eyes open.
March 16, 2008 — 10:40 pm
Greg Swann says:
To Jeff Kempe: Nineteenth, right now. I couldn’t find it last night. For all of me, Ashley can go to hell in her own way. But on her way, she’s teaching us a ton about Google. This is a meta-issue Teri is talking about: Harvest only values, and, even then, only your own values. Squalor is nothing, just so much debris to be swept out of the way. Splendor is everything. Brian Brady is pulling diamonds out of the mud. They may be muddy — but they’re still diamonds.
March 17, 2008 — 3:20 pm
Rob says:
You are number two – who is number one?
March 18, 2008 — 5:00 am