Been ruminating my little arse off this week. How about you?
I’m a hyper-local blogger. I’m on the Bloodhound Blog because of a contest Greg and I teamed up to compete in- my being here is kind of a fluke, and frankly the only reason I’m still here is because this is such a great pack of dogs with which to run, at this point I can’t imagine giving up this gig. I have no desire for fame or fortune in the RE.net, best evidenced by the infrequency that I post here. My focus is to build a fantastic and profitable hyper-local weblog. Does hyper-local weblogging work? As someone once said: That’s another post for another day.
What I do is blog to a very specific group of people. I don’t blog for the RE.net, and if you check your MyBlogLog widget you can confirm that I rarely visit your blog. In my limited time, I visit blogs in Dayton Ohio. Those are the blogs that matter most to me and my local blog.
I do Twitter though, and from that I’ve met quite a few RE.net bloggers, and I have completely enjoyed making Twitterfriends with each and every one of them. One of my favorites (yeah I got favorites, don’t you?) is Daniel Rothamel. There are very few RE.net bloggers I respect more than Daniel. We’ve had several offline conversations, and that is a RE.net relationship that I value. Earlier last week when he tweeted that he just posted a video, I didn’t hesitate to take a look. I like Daniel’s video. I did then, and I do now. I thought it went well as a link to a post on my home blog, so I added it without hesitation. Then Jeff Brown posted about it and fast forward to all hell breaking loose.
As I said, I don’t spend much time in the RE.net. I had no idea how much hell could actually break loose. At first I simply sat back and watched, taking my place among the elusive ninety and nine. Daniel and I even shared a gentle joke over the fuss. But then, (apparently true to form) I did begin to ruminate and by Saturday morning I was thoroughly confused.
Two things were happening here: The first, and most important to me, was that I could somehow unintentionally offend my readers. I didn’t see how anyone could possibly be offended by Daniel’s video, but when Greg, Kris, Russell, and then Cathy all agreed that it could be offensive, I had to take that seriously. Last night Greg, Cathy, and I, shot some emails back and forth. The end result for me was that I was going to respectfully agree to disagree with them. At the same time all this emailing was going on, I was Twittering and Mariana Wagner and I started following each other.
I know the name Mariana Wagner. I know she is a respected real estate blogger. I was curious to find out more about her through Twitter. Within a half hour of my last email to Greg and Cathy, Jay Thompson tweeted a link to his pick for video of the week, so I went over to take a peek. My guess is that Mariana is a nice person. All the comments on Jay’s post suggest she’s well liked and has a wonderful sense of humor. In all likihood she is a great real estate professional, but I don’t know her. When I saw her video, I was, well… I was offended. I felt it was condescending. That may or may not have been her intent, and it doesn’t matter; she doesn’t know me, so she didn’t create that video for me. And before you bitch about my delicate sensitivities, take note: I’m not easily insulted or offended, and you’d be missing the point anyway. The point is that much to my own surprise and horror, I instantly recognized what Greg was trying to tell me: Someone, anyone, one person whom I’ve never met, one person who is looking to me for sound professional advice and guidance, could be offended by what I had posted. Why would I do that? I work really hard to create my blog, why would I post something that could be misconstrued, even if I didn’t understand how that could happen?
It’s highly likely that Mariana doesn’t give a poo about my reaction to her video- and she really shouldn’t care- my reaction to her video doesn’t reflect on her as a person or a professional. And my concern here is not really with her video anyway, except that it served as a wake-up call to understanding my own personal ninety and nine.
So. Video-on intrepid RE.netters! Push the boundaries! Unchain thy-selves! Someday perhaps I’ll join in the merry-making. Just remember that we don’t all share the same funny bones. And if you are in the ninety and nine? You may wish to continue to ruminate awhile. Which brings me to the other thing that I watched in discomfort from home.
If you are a RE.netter, you can stop reading now. This next part is between me and the ninety and nine. Are they gone? Okay, now that we are alone, between you and me: I don’t quite understand the inner workings of the RE.net power bloggers. I don’t know about you, but I got my head down, trying to keep my nose to the grindstone, scrapping out a meager existence. They make a lot of inside jokes and references to posts that first posted back in the dark ages when they all began to blog. They seem to break off into clans… Now there’s an idea- perhaps my first video for the RE.net will be a whiteboard scorecard so we can keep track of who is pissed at whom.
This week reminded me of the once-upon-a-time when I was a Dance Mom- think soccer mom in a world of pink tulle. You’ve never seen such gossiping and grudge matches and political posturing- and that was just the moms. It’s the kind of world where otherwise sweet girls embrace the pure ugliness of highly charged and competitive behavior. I was quite thrilled- you have no idea how thrilled, I mean you really can’t imagine how thrilled I was- to leave all that behind when my daughter said she had had enough.
Once my daughter bolted from that convoluted world, we were able to sit together and look back and laugh our butts off at one perfect glimpse into the world of twisted politics at the cliquish level. Just like in the dance world, just like in the ancient world, just like high school, sometimes the RE.net world gets a little um, mean.
Brian Brady says:
“my being here is kind of a fluke”
Oh, no you don’t. You being here is a direct result of taking what is rightfully yours, Teri. You stood up and said “let me play”, just like I did, a year ago. You may have entered the mansion through a different door (like I did) but you are in the mansion and as BIG a contributor as anyone.
We all have different talents but remember that the key word here is “talent”. While you entered as an “apprentice” you quickly rose to the title of “Master” of local blogging. Your contributions come from a much different perspective than anyone. I, and all, pay EXTREMELY close attention to the Lussier files.
..and here’s the cool part, Teri. I’m sure your father taught you this:
Ain’t nobody gonna hand it to ya.
…and that’s good. The nectar is sweeter when it’s earned; you’ve earned every bit of your sweetness.
You’re a dog, Teri, a bloodhound, through and through
December 23, 2007 — 11:35 pm
Jay Thompson says:
Teri – didn’t mean to offend you (or anyone) by posting that video.
I tend to march to the beat of a different drummer — chiefly me. TheBrickRanch is a world-class “hyper local’ blog, don’t sell yourself short.
Hyper local though, is not the only route to a “successful” blog. That though, is a whole ‘nuther post.
I am of the mindset that if one blogs with the intent or purpose to please everyone, then one will likely get all bogged down in that and maybe, just maybe wind up thinking themselves into a hole that they can’t climb out of.
“Someone, anyone, one person whom I’ve never met, one person who is looking to me for sound professional advice and guidance, could be offended by what I had posted. Why would I do that? I work really hard to create my blog, why would I post something that could be misconstrued, even if I didn’t understand how that could happen?”
Blog long enough, and you WILL post something that offends someone. If you start examining every post and every comment, if you start over-analyzing, worrying if you might offend a person, then it’s entirely possible that you may wind up attempting to please everyone — and wind up pleasing no one.
December 24, 2007 — 12:31 am
Greg Swann says:
> I’m on the Bloodhound Blog because of a contest Greg and I teamed up to compete in- my being here is kind of a fluke
I didn’t think to react to this until Brian did. You’re being here is no fluke. I was approached by a bunch of people for that contest. They were all interesting candidates, but you stood way out from the pack. I knew you would be able to hold your own here, and you’ve more than borne out that judgement.
We watched Inherit the Wind tonight. First time I had seen it, but it was the perfect DVD for us right now. I had forgotten that H.L. Mencken was involved in the Scopes Monkey Trial, so Gene Kelly was a complete delight. Here’s a clip:
December 24, 2007 — 1:30 am
Teri Lussier says:
Jay-
I’m not taking you to task for posting that, I’m certainly not taking Mariana to task for creating her video. Plenty of people got a huge kick out it, and I don’t fault them one bit.
My reaction to that video shocked even me. I can’t explain why I reacted the way I did, but I can tell you it was a strong reaction. And my immediate thought was that I don’t want anyone to react that way to what I post on The Brick Ranch.
I completely understand that you can’t please all the people all the time, but on my blog, on my home blog, on my professional hyper-local blog, I’m very careful about what I post.
I post on another local blog in Dayton that is mostly politics. You want to offend someone? Say the word libertarian in Dayton.
I’m posting here. You want to offend someone? Say the name Greg Swann. ::wink::
No argument from me- there are many routes to a successful blog; the key is in understanding which route you are on.
December 24, 2007 — 6:23 am
Teri Lussier says:
Brian-
Greg-
Thanks guys, however.
But I’m using the word ‘fluke’ to describe the circumstances that got me here. The undiluted truth is that a whole bunch of dumb lucky ducks all lined up on one particular day: I just happened to poke my head in on Active Rain one day, and just happened to check in to see what trouble Brian was stirring up, and just happened to catch his post about some vague contest- the details hadn’t been hammered out yet; linking to a coach I’d never heard of- Greg.
When I got here, I wasted no time looking at what his blog was all about, I went to his website. The Bloodhound Realty website was what sold me on the blogging coach. Dumb luck because if I had poked around here for any length of time, I would have: a)Ruminated, b)Run for the hills. I chose c)Put me in coach. Plus, remember I thought I was signing up for a contest. I had no clue I was signing up for BHB. You put all that together…fluky. Perhaps Greg knew what was going on, but I sure as hell didn’t.
The circumstances that got me here are fluky, holding my own here- not so much.
December 24, 2007 — 6:40 am
Teri Lussier says:
Greg-
Inherit the Wind is one I’ve not seen either. That clip is priceless. Thanks for that.
December 24, 2007 — 6:43 am
Brian Brady says:
“just happened to check in to see what trouble Brian was stirring up”
Serially guilty.
December 24, 2007 — 7:35 am
Teri Lussier says:
>Serially guilty.
Exactly. Which is why I love reading your posts, particularly in a format like Active Rain where there is an incredible amount of pablum. Going back to Jay’s comment about offending someone eventually- I admire and aspire to write what I’m really thinking, and be able to defend it.
The hard part, the part I only understood after I saw Jay’s post, the part that Greg, Kris, Russell, Cathy and you were all trying to point out, is that offending someone, and making someone think are not one and the same.
December 24, 2007 — 8:14 am
Mariana says:
Teri-
Wow. I am honored. Honestly.
… Not that I offended you (because “offense” was not my intent whatsoever) but because I made something that created strong reactions in many people. (Like Seth Godin says, “Be Remarkable.” … and I have gotten quite a few “remarks” because of this.)
Yes. Many of the reactions were laughter (my favorite reaction). But seeing that it also created a reaction like yours makes me proud that I was able to step out of the shadowy-box-of-don’t-share-your-opinion-because-you-might-offend-someone and actually MAKE a video like that. (I still like the video I made and I stand behind the message that I was trying to get across, which just was: Enough Already. Be Nice.)
No. I will not apologize for offending anyone, even you – and I like you! Why? Well, first, a true apology would mean that I would not do it again, and quite frankly, I guarantee that I will offend someone again… Second, if my video created a reaction in you that led you to a higher level of understanding about something else, then ultimately it was good. So yay!
All that said, I will never be all things to all people, and I never want to be – Motherhood, Wifedom and Real Estate is enough of a full-time job as it is … and Life is too short.
I am sure that the next video that I do will offend other people and I am okay with that – just as long as a single “offense” does not destroy long term professional integrity.
Have a wonderful 2008!
December 24, 2007 — 11:23 am
Teri Lussier says:
Mariana-
Firstly, thank you for responding so honestly here; if for no other reason than that -I like you too. 🙂
And we are in agreement on a lot of things here, like Enough already and Be nice.
>quite frankly, I guarantee that I will offend someone again…
I also can guarantee that I will post something that will offend someone but, when I do, I want to control the who, what, and when as much as possible. I know I can’t control everything- I do step in shit on occasion- but there are definite steps I can take to keep from tracking it into my house. On my blog I do what needs to be done to make sure that “a single “offense” does not destroy long term professional integrity.”
Keep in mind that the only time I write for anyone outside of Dayton is when I post here. I never ever write for the RE.net on my home blog. Nothing I post there is ever intended for any other eyes than buyers and sellers in Dayton- it’s strictly professional. Even when I twitter, I assume that Dayton residents are reading- I try to watch my P’s & Q’s. I think that is an important distinction to make with the way I purpose my home blog, and the way many other RE bloggers purpose their home blogs. Even Jay posted a disclaimer for anyone reading who was not following the RE.net. I would never do that (not that there’s anything wrong with that 😉 ).
I’m also glad you created that video- it opened my eyes.
I never expected or even wanted an apology- you shouldn’t apologize if you are well pleased with your result. I posted here to explain to anyone paying attention why I had made a sudden turn around about the you-know-what. If I had not made a comment on Jeff Brown’s post saying that I had linked to the video, I most likely would have quietly gone about my business- My blog, my decisions, I owe no one here an explanation for what I do on my blog. You don’t either. I think we are agreed on that, as well.
At any rate, I am looking forward to tweeting with you, and all the best to you and your family in 2008!
December 24, 2007 — 1:54 pm
Mariana says:
Teri- We agree on almost everything. 😀
My “real estate blog” is extremely hyper-local as well. I didn’t even see fit to post the zebra video on it (IMHO – I liked it but it didn’t “fit” with the purpose of my blog.) I leave all non-100%-consumer-with-the-occasional-benign-humor-stuff for AG.
Yes, some “consumers” will wander over to AG and read all of my non-consumer stuph – but they do that at THEIR own risk (not mine). I hide nothing, and am completely OK with everything I write/record – no matter who reads/views it… No regrets! I am who I am and consumers either like me or choose to do business with someone else. I am okay with that.
Ultimately, you make a VERY, VERY valid point that more people need to understand:
Make sure that what you put on the web is stuff that you will always stand behind – no matter WHO reads it… and trust me… the non-RE Public IS reading, watching and forming opinions about each and every one of us.
Tweet atchya later!
December 24, 2007 — 3:48 pm