I went to a high school run by the Jesuits. Think “Dead Poets Society” with Roman collars. The teachers were a little bit Pope John Paul II, a whole lot of Vince Lombardi, and, as is necessary to the development of young men, a healthy amount of Thomas Jefferson. The Jesuits are often admired for their ability to develop the “whole man”: intellectual, athletic, social, and most importantly, moral.
We were encouraged to be irreverent in the reverence of our school. The very irreverent actions we engaged in were seen by the Jesuits as an exhibition of curiosity. Pranks performed, under the guise of “school spirit”, were not only tolerated but encouraged. When it was suggested that one of our rival’s star basketball players was being bribed to attend a certain college, we waved checks in the stands when he attempted his free throws. Brother John, the Prefect of Discipline, may have handed down the ceremonial J.U.G. that day but the practice of pranks was generally tolerated.
Rarely did our pranks elevate to the status of unconscious insult. I say “rarely” because it did happen, about once a year. When it happened, it was usually the product of a good intention with garnered support from the crowd. In short, we took it just a bit too far without the forethought of the consequences of our actions.
The consequence was much harsher than a JUG; it was a speech attacking our moral fiber by none other than the President of the school. That sage old priest, a modicum of morality, started off the admonishment with a request to “walk a mile in the victims’ moccassins” and ended with the horrendous revelation that we, in our ignorance, injured some (or many) of those without the benefits we had.
Ouch! That admonishment always resulted in a bevy of boys, walking around with humble and contrite hearts, wondering if we would ever amount to the “whole man” St. Ignatius Loyola envisioned.
I’m going to digress from the high school story but I’ll bring it back later. Last night, I attended my daughter’s Christmas pageant. It was, of course, remarkable. Prior to the pageant, parents jostle for position in the audience, as early as an hour before the curtain rises. Position equals photo opps. Mindless small talk is the agenda for the pre-pageant hour. Two past clients discussed one of my opinion pieces, about HR 3915, on “my blog”.
I asked “Mortgage Rates Report?”.
“No” were the responses, “the one with the dog”.
“GASP” I thought…”Bloodhound? Bloodhound is an industry blog!” I smiled wanly and thanked them for their support. I filed the discovery in the “be careful what you post” file in my brain, changed the subject, and anticipated my daughter’s pageant.
This afternoon, I clicked over to Bloodhound to see Greg’s homily, citing the Book of Matthew. “Awshit”, I thought. “I just met two of the ninety and nine, last night”. What Greg said was true; the Unchained project is teaching us that many read but don’t comment. Apparently, some of the many don’t engage in real estate brokerage or loan origination; they hire us to do that for them.
Blogging is starting to achieve what we all convinced ourselves it would do; it’s attracting customers. I sat with Laurie Manny, in her Long Beach office, last month and watched two agents, from competing firms, seek her out to introduce themselves to her. I heard a telemarketer call her (from WeSellStuffToRealtors.com) and eschew his normal sales pitch for a chance to talk to “Long Beach Laurie“. The two of us were frightened with her newfound fame.
A video with a powerful message was posted about members of the flock who are struggling with the quickly changing market- we call those people consumers. While it’s genius said the same thing Russell Shaw has been saying, its delivery reduced our opinion of the consumer’s intellect to that of the average first-grader’s. It was, to use my high school example, locker room humor that was innocently enough heard by the ladies at the Mother’s Club tea, next door. We all, unintentionally offended in our adolescent support for what, we thought, was a cute way to hammer an important message home.
…and the resident Jesuit called us on the carpet for it.
The reactions to his homily were more visceral than the venal sin itself. They ranged from an accusation of arrogance to a rationalization of the irrational, with a chorus of maybes. The arrogance, however, comes from within as we carelessly ignore the struggles of half of the ninety and nine (assuming half the consumers are sellers). We can rationalize this behavior with all the maybes we can muster but the consumers will simply…choose someone else.
I’m no less guilty than the producer of the video; I was among the pack(#5), cheering on the producer for his creativity.
Sometimes, what seems like a well-intentioned message can be a public relations nightmare. Our future employers ARE watching us. This blogging thing is starting to work.
Mea Culpa.
Teresa Boardman says:
Blogs have been working for a long time.
December 22, 2007 — 4:35 am
Arlington Virginia Condos — Jay says:
Diddo that, Teresa. My blog brought me the great majority of my business this year….And it was a rockin’ year! I see more wannabe bloggers in my market, but it’s only a small portion of bloggers out there who know what they’re doing as far as lead generation is concerned.
December 22, 2007 — 8:04 am
Kris Berg says:
Well said, Brian.
December 22, 2007 — 8:20 am
Kris Berg says:
I should have added that your comment about “the one with the dog” cracked me up. I have gotten that too, once from a cousin who was trying to Google me for directions to my house (not my smartest cousin), and each time it is a reminder that while we may feel like we are engaging in “private” little shop-talk, it is anything but private.
December 22, 2007 — 8:27 am
Bob in San Diego says:
You are talking about Greg’s post, right?
December 22, 2007 — 8:56 am
Jonathan Dalton says:
And lost in the midst of the recitation of Hail Marys in search of penance comes the reality of human nature …
Our homes never are overpriced, only our neighbors. Because WE know what our homes are worth as owners.
(cough)
Most consumers looking at that video will not see it as “I’m so insulted he thinks I would overprice MY house!”
Instead, they’ll see it as “That moron Johnson should see this so he could sell!”
December 22, 2007 — 9:02 am
Ken Montville says:
Kris is right on! I am always surprised that many (and I include myself) fall into the trap of the mind that since we are writing back to people with names that we think it’s like a letter or note we stick in the mailbox for the mailman to deliver in a sealed envelope.
The Internet is public space. Anybody in the world (as in the Whole World Wide World) can peek if they know where to look. That’s the upside and the downside.
Or, as Greg might point out, it’s transparency.
We need to be as considerate on the ‘Net as we are in “real” life. Or not.
December 22, 2007 — 10:21 am
Brian Brady says:
While I agree with Teresa’s comment and the supporting ones, blogs are still in their infancy. We have yet to realize the true potential of weblogging as a business builder. I have heard people attribute a 6-figure income to blogging but nobody has hit 7 figures. I think that will change in the next few years.
…and we’re at the forefront of this evolution.
One thing I’ve learned is that, as Kris points out, people are watching. The San Diego fires demonstrated the power of the group blog- my parents talked about how they felt they “knew” Jeff and Kris because of their communications at Bloodhound. In fact, many people said they didn’t worry about me too much when they realized that Jeff and Kris were in my back yard.
We got exactly what we wanted- people are watching.
December 22, 2007 — 10:56 am
Carole Cohen says:
Brian I still get incredulous when someone quotes a post of mine because it is always someone who has never appeared as a commenter…well, and that covers most of cleveland lol. And oddly, I get more comments from social network posts like AR than I do even on my own. So what you say is true. I do have to say that the whole video thing, Dan did what he wanted and that is all we can ask of any of us no? The training I got that said be yourself and try to picture your client on your shoulder, or, before Real Estate, your mother 🙂 It’s kind of a Jesuit approach when you think about it.
December 22, 2007 — 11:06 am
Brian Brady says:
“It’s kind of a Jesuit approach when you think about it.”
Yep. Remember, though, that while Jesuits will often talk about the “ends justify the means”, their guiding motto is “Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam”.
Let’s not take a religious approach to this but a philosophical one, Carole. In short, the Jesuits would say “do what whatever it takes” but remind us that we are under moral scrutiny at all times. It can be paradoxical in practice, no?
I think Dan’s post was brilliant, inasmuch as it used a medium and message that simply stated the obvious…to the “insiders”. I praised his work. Here’s the problem: while I praised his work, I did so at the considerable expense of the consumer, and the consumer was watching Dan and me.
So, to use my loose analogy, Dan made a “crude” but funny locker room joke and I piled on with a “crude” comment. While that joke would have been appropriate in the locker room, among the “guys”, it was “crude” to the Mother’s Club who could hear us in the next room…and we should have realized that the Mother’s Club met at the same time we came in from football practice.
Here is the more interesting twist; people are actually trying to rationalize the “crude” joke under the guise of the First Amendment. Now, the piling on is directed at the moral criticism of our bad behavior. The rationalization is “well, boys will be boys” and that doesn’t hold water in a civilized world.
That’s the source of my “mea culpa”. I’m not perfect nor do I expect to be tomorrow. The best I can do is recognize it and try to do better.
December 22, 2007 — 11:45 am
Brian Brady says:
“You are talking about Greg’s post, right?”
Hardly, Bob.
Will you be displaying Dan’s video (or something as edgy) on Home Sales San Diego?
December 22, 2007 — 12:15 pm
Bob in San Diego says:
I have shown it to agents, clients and some anti-agent types. No one thought it insulting.
As for putting it on HSSD, I wasn’t planning on it. I know down to the IP who my audience is. More importantly, I know who in the audience is important to me. I could care less if any agent ever visits my site, reads or comments on my blog.
I found out about the video by reading Greg’s rant on it here, so my initial perspective was whacked a bit. I was focusing on the theater of the absurd that now has this pic as it’s featured movie of the week.
Your question instantly cleared up my tunnel vision, though. So the answer is “Yes, I will”. It will be part of a series on what it takes to actually sell a property in San Diego versus the myths some agents defend in order to justify their commissions.
December 22, 2007 — 1:06 pm
Brian Brady says:
“Your question instantly cleared up my tunnel vision, though. So the answer is “Yes, I will”.”
Cool, Bob. You’ve always been cutting edge. I’ll look forward to seeing our neighbors’ reactions.
December 22, 2007 — 1:38 pm
Ines Hegedus-Garcia says:
Brian – I appreciate your tone in this post and I think you would agree that we are all very aware of the permanence of our posts and comments in the Internet.
Personal or indirect attacks are never a good strategy, even if you don’t agree on a subject. I have always liked the way that you deal with adversity without offending anyone.
As for the video, I think it’s up to the consumer to feel offended or not – I did place the video on Miamism with an explanation and I have received phone calls of customers asking me why on earth I would think someone would get offended at that!
It’s all about the delivery of the message – whether it’s the video, the criticism of the delivery or the rebuttal to the criticism.
December 22, 2007 — 2:58 pm
Robert D. Ashby says:
I was amazed at all of the controversy this issue stirred up. I think you have put it succinctly enough in your post that shows how things can get out of hand, well done.
I also wanted to state my agreement with your “blogs are still in their infancy” comment. That is absolutely correct. While they have seen some success, they are far from realizing their full potential, very far indeed.
December 22, 2007 — 3:51 pm
Bob in San Diego says:
I’m fairly certain the only negative reactions will be from agents.
December 22, 2007 — 4:48 pm
Thomas Johnson says:
Wonderful post, Brian! Having just come off about 2 weeks ago, a very silly food fight at Trulia, my head is very much in how public and permanent the web can be. We all agonize over our static web sites, but the spontaneity and the wide reach of blogging are causing me to add a certain caution to my posts. We are after all, interviewing for a job, and it’s a job that is of utmost importance to my family.
Find your voice, or as Bagger Vance would say, “Your authentic swing” just don’t run off the customers.
I would also like to wish a very Merry Christmas, the joy of the season and a most prosperous 2008 to all here in the kennel. May we all attract and and be able to serve our share of the nine and ninety.
December 22, 2007 — 8:23 pm