Prologue: My initial post on this subject, was widely read, and seemed to generate responses on one side or the other, not many in the middle. That makes sense. One commenter came at me full throttle, remaining civil, detailing why, a hyper-local farm not only wouldn’t work, but wouldn’t be any more productive than what he’s doing now, offline.
We both, no doubt, think the other is partaking of herbs not meant for cooking. π In short, I think he’s a good guy, harboring an honest difference of opinion. The following is how we have disagreed.
I think I’d really like Spencer Barron. In fact, judging by our give and take in the comments of my most recent post, I like him and respect him. We have respectfully disagreed on the concept of the hyper-local farm site, but it’s been fun. He’s obviously a pretty smart guy.
Can you feel the butter, Spencer? π
Spenser — The next time I’m in Denver, I’m buying. We gotta meet, cuz it’s always fun to talk with guys who disagree with me so much, yet so well, and stay so wrong. π
Your VW just passed me? To extend the metaphor, you’re driving a VW because your approach can’t generate enough money to acquire a Ferrari. π
Let’s count the ways you are, in my view, not only dead wrong, but worse, basing your thinking on absolutely false premises — a mistake that almost always proves fatal.
You said — Since you will be continuously marketing them to go to your blog, why donβt you just tell them why they should use you. You could try to appeal directly to the people your trying to reach, home sellers. Why all the coy games?
False Premise #1 — Wait a minute, let me write that one down. π You mean, I should actually tell them why I’m the best agent for them? Well I’ll be dogged.
I’ll be continuously marketing them to go to my blog. All that will be done in the infancy of the site (blog? website? hybrid? who cares?) because that’s what’ll make it go. Once they’re there, the site itself will bring them back. Sure, I might (while still in early stages) continue to touch them in traditional ways to keep them curious and interested, but once it’s been there awhile, that won’t be necessary. It’ll become viral inside the neighborhood, in fact predictably so.
Coy games? Come to my neighborhood site which is only about your neighborhood, is somehow coy?
Geez, Spencer, you talk like I’m driving by and batting my eyes alluringly. π How do I appeal to them if they aren’t yet at my site? There’s 2,000 homes or so per farm. I’d have no less than three farms. Tell me, are you knockin’ on that many doors? Using mental telepathy? Have one of those cool magnetic signs on your car doors? Have your picture on a bus bench?
You said — I mean, it seems like your already segmenting out your farm by attempting to determine what theyβre interested in when the only thing you really need to know is that the people you want to meet want to sell a home (or buy).
False Premise #2 — You seem to have passed over my highly successful previous farming experience. With the few exceptions that tend to prove the rule, I know what they’re interested in. Segmenting? That’s silly on its face. Neighborhoods are segmented by definition, Spencer. Here are a few ‘segments’: homes with kids; homes without kids; under 50; over 50; church goers; with kids but aren’t that involved in schools (usually the MAJORITY); with kids and involved in schools; business owners; and that’s the short list. I’M not segmenting them because they’re already segmented – just like in real life. π
You said — (paraphrased) I’m assuming the farms residents are internet savvy.
False Premise #3 — We agree on one thing here: It MUST be a neighborhood more likely than not to be computer users. That’s easily ascertained as you’re well aware. I’m of course, NOT assuming this to be a fact, as it could prove to be a fatal assumption, not to mention moronic to do so. π
You said — Youβre assuming that once you say that they can get this information, theyβll go to it.
False Premise #4 — THIS ISN’T A FALSE PREMISE AT ALL. π It’s my experience the vast majority will visit, if only because they’re curious. It’s the same as when I farmed back in the days of 50Β’ gas. Once they got used to seeing me, and getting my schlocky little hot sheet, over 80% of them became pretty receptive, if not outright evangelists. Human behavior hasn’t changed much since then. The only difference is, after awhile I and my team won’t need to, as you might phrase it, waste our time constantly having to be physically in the neighborhood. This will be cuz, for the same reason you have a site and a blog, they’ll come to me instead of me always having to physically go to them.
Back in my original farm, I was down with the flu for about a week, and couldn’t deliver my Hot Sheet. I gave myself an extra week after recovering, so as not to relapse. As I was finally delivering the Hot Sheets to the farm’s residents, I was surprised to hear so many of them comment on its tardiness. Some of them actually pressed me for an explanation. It was eye opening. They were telling me the Hot Sheet was something they’d come to expect and anticipate. Very cool.
You said — Youβre assuming that your entire farm of 2000 is interested in recent PTA activity or high school sports or whatever, personally I donβt think more than 20% of your farm will even care on anything more than a yearly basis.
False Premise #5 — Please point out exactly where I said that. (silence) I don’t assume anything of the sort, and furthermore, I don’t need to. That assumption would be absurd. When you and I read a newspaper (real paper or online), π it’s probably safe to ‘assume’ we would start with different ‘segments’ or, better stated, sections, of the paper. I go to sports, and you might go to travel, local news, or the front page. I then go to read the really silly stuff, usually located in the ‘Currents’ section. I also read a bunch on ‘My Yahoo’ daily. I then go to just plain Yahoo and read the finance section. Then I go to a handful of specific writers on various subjects of which I hold interest.
In other word, I don’t read what you do, but we both read the paper, or Yahoo, or whatever. That’s the point of having so many choices.
The point is this — Different homeowners in the farm will have different interests — duh. (Hello!? Captain Obvious, where are you?) π But they share their interests, overall, in what goes on in the neighborhood, and what affects it. I’m betting this might be why newspapers long ago decided maybe it was a better idea to combine all those interests in one product, instead of one for sports, one for politics, etc. π
You said — Youβre also assuming that people would embrace a commercial entity as the purveyor of their hyper-local information needs, when most successful forums of this sort tend to be non-commercial ventures. Short of an agent moving to the neighborhood, having a couple of kids, joining the PTA, then finding religion in the neighborhood, it seems like a stretch to be accepted. (italics added)
No real false premise here, but an assumption I simply don’t understand. What rationale is used to even bring up this question? What does commercial vs non-commercial have to do with anything when marketing real estate services?
Again, and with a light-hearted spirit — give me a freakin’ break. π
How is it you can do all the things to generate business in your area, without the slightest worry your targets might, Heaven forbid, think you’re a commercial operation? Yet without taking a breath, you say I don’t operate under the same rules? Does gravity work differently in different zip codes? Of course not — and folks with a three digit IQ will assume I’m running a commercial operation, as otherwise I’d be the first (purposefully) non-profit real estate brokerage in history. Hey, maybe I could associate myself with the Red Cross! Yeah, that’s the ticket. π
I didn’t live in my farm back in the day, and in today’s dollars, I would have made about $390,000 a year — in a farm only 20% the size I’m now advocating as a minimum. Can an agent knock on 2,000 doors a month every month, and deliver the incredible amount of in depth and varied content my site does?
Don’t answer — it’s a trick question. The agent, even if he knocked on 95 doors daily, Mon-Fri 52 weeks a year, (somewhat unlikely?) wouldn’t reach 20% of the homeowners. Why? Because they’re not home like they were 30+ years ago, as the wives who answered the door for me, are now at work when he knocks. Meanwhile, the agent’s home eating dinner that night, while the homeowners are coming to my site on their own. After viewing my site, by the way, how much value do you think they give the weak-ass flyer the other agent left on their screen door?
Flyer — Call me — I’m Mr. Bitchen Agent, and know everything there is to know about this neighborhood, and ah, I’m really, really good too. Here’s one I almost sold a few months ago.
You said — Youβre assuming that youβll become the 1st or 2nd choice in your farm within a year simply because youβre the neighborhood enthusiast that happens to also be a real estate agent when most people will pick their agent for other reasons. Reasons like who will sell my home for the most, or who can sell it the fastest. Some pick because of the marketing package and exposure their home gets and others pick the agent that is the cheapest. Worse yet, you might never get to be the top choice simply because the farm is busy using the teacherβs husband that happens to be an agent. See, they met them from going to those PTA meetings.
False Premise #6 AND the hands down winner for being absolutely devoid of any merit whatsoever — I’m not giving farm residents reasons to do business with me — specifically: To hire me to sell their home.
I wish I had a neon sign at this point in the conversation. π Did anyone actually think there wasn’t gonna be places all over the site demonstrating my expertise, experience, professionalism — and uh, my staggeringly superior results? Come on, are you serious? Does that even need to be said out loud?
For Heaven’s sake, that’s the only reason the dang site exists. Geez Louise Mytle. π
My content gets them there and keeps them interested — and yes, due to different reasons for different homeowners. There’s all kinds of reasons to hire me, made clear on almost every page. It scares me this has to be mentioned, much less defended. All the info and local depth of scope is in addition to the marketing of me as their agent.
I’d market myself the same way I did over 30 years ago. They knew, after about 6-8 months, that Jeff Brown not only was selling the vast majority of homes in their neighborhood, but he was setting new records for price highs while doing it. They didn’t care much for the how at that point. They never do, unless it’s an afterthought. Once I was known as the Holly Hills guy, any debate was over before it ever began.
Spencer has mentioned branding in his comments. If the name of the neighborhood is The Village in La Mesa — my name will immediately be associated with that neighborhood in 6-12 months — maybe less. I will be La Mesa — The Village. Back in the day, I was Holly Hills, and it took about eight months.
Time out for a slight, but related digression.
What makes this especially entertaining for me, is remembering how so many brokers, back in the ’60’s, absolutely knew what the downfall of my dad’s business model would be. They said it was twofold.
1.) He refused to me a member of the MLS, as his company double-ended every single transaction for five consecutive years. (The only reason he wasn’t a board member was because they insisted he then join the MLS.) They reasoned, without their help, he couldn’t possibly succeed.
The truth? The entire MLS needed him — not (never) the other way around. In those five years, you could pick any 30 day period you wished, and his company would have more listings priced at or under the median price than the entire MLS.
2.) His firm never used ‘For Sale’ signs.
Those two factors are what put him at the top of the heap in San Diego real estate brokerage back then. Five years — 5,000+ sides. Do the math. π I got to watch it from the inside, as I was the company janitor/listing printer/listing delivery boy for half of those five years. I thought that’s how it was for real estate companies everywhere. As I got older, and realized how wrong I was, the numbers became even more staggering to me.
No ‘For Sale‘ signs? No matter how long it might have taken to sell a home, it always appeared to sell in a day. One day there was nothing, the next day there was his company’s ‘Sold‘ sign in the front yard. It was an advantage for which his competition had little or know answer.
I’m using some of his original advice, given to me when I told him about plans for my original farm. I asked him what he would do. He laughed, saying he wasn’t gonna tell me what I should do, because he knew the author of the book I was using, personally. He said there was something I should never do. When talking to a homeowner, in person or on the phone, I should never, ever, without exception, ask them if they were thinking of moving or selling. Upon seeing my confused 23 year old look, he explained.
“Folks will view that question as not only rude, but none of your damn business.” I thought he was nuts, but given his success in the biz, not to mention he was Dad, I just took it on faith he was right. Right? What an understatement.
As trivial as it may seem, it turned out to be one of the keys to my success in farming.
One of the most often repeated observations made by farm residents, as they were signing listing contracts with me, was that they appreciated the way I never pressed them for their personal plans, as the most other agents usually did. It was exactly like Dad said it would be. He said to ask instead, if they knew if any of their friends or neighbors had been thinking about selling or moving out. If they were thinking that themselves, and wanted me to know, they’d tell me. He said if I’d done my marketing well, they’d choose me whether I asked them or not — and he was right. Big time.
Questions: I know there have to be agents reading this who’ve farmed before, or are now. How many agents who’ve read this post, plus the first one, and are following the comments, have generated even a couple sides monthly from a lousy little 400 home farm? I know you’re out there. Now increase the size of that farm five times. How much labor are you willing to put in to do 50-100 sides a year? If you’re already doing that, imagine how you can leverage the holy crud (RE technical term) out of that success.
Which brings me to my final thoughts.
Ever wonder how it is one agent does so much more volume than another? If we stipulate they’re roughly equal in most ways, the answer will lie in what results they actually produce in the real world. I know — duh.
I’ve paid big money for marketing that wasn’t worth the stamp it took to get my check sent to them. I’ve cold called successfully — taught it for a few years. For nearly 20 years my targeted direct mail was also very successful. Blogging has produced more than I’d ever thought possible. Other brokers and agents have, for years, referred their investment clients to me. One or two a year ask me to advise them personally. And of course, clients refer people to me.
But none of those are the most important and by far the most productive marketing tool I’ve ever used.
The best marketing tool any of us will ever have is R-E-S-U-L-T-S.
If you’re already doing the volume of business you wish, there’s no reason to start a hyper-local farm site. If you’re already doing a deal a week or better, but would like to take your game up a notch or three, this might be something for you to consider. It’s surely not for everybody.
And you obviously don’t need to be doing a lot of business before you start, either.
Because you’re already consistently producing results for buyers/sellers, you have a head start from day one of your hyper-local farm site. You produce. There’s nothing like ending the conversation with a homeowner by being able to say, “They’re going to produce for you? I’ve been producing in this community for X years, and am doing it today. Do you want promises to produce results — or a results producer?”
In the last 15 months or so of my farming career, all but a couple listings required presentations which began and ended with, “sign and date here, please“. They liked the results they kept seeing in their neighborhood — my sold signs. My ‘Hot Sheet’ telling them about the new highest price just received by a neighbor.
Spenser, your fantasy of passing my Ferrari with your VW notwithstanding, I’m not saying here that my way is necessarily superior to whatever you’re doing to produce the stellar results I suspect you’re now producing. That is, unless we were to go head to head in a neutral neighborhood. π
The only way you’d be able to keep up with my Ferrari with your reliable VW then, would be if I decided to stay in first gear.
Not likely. π
Epilogue: I’ve made a new friend, and he’s very smart. All I’ll tell you about him is he’s a successful and experienced agent with a team in place. He’s gonna (I think) construct a hyper-local neighborhood web-presence — in the only part of his town in which he does little business. He’s tech savvy big time, and has a can-do attitude that’s viral. He’ll have his Ferrari up and running, possibly before the end of this year, maybe even before the holiday’s.
He knows where the bodies are buried in his area, as he’s lived there most of his life. He’s the perfect guy to take this on. In our first (of many I’m sure) conversation, his ideas were brilliant. He absolutely gets it. He’s also not a newbie, who hasn’t really done much yet, though those agents can succeed with this approach. He’s already doing more than a side every couple days as it is. He wants to dominate though. Gotta love a guy like that. It doesn’t hurt that he’s smarter than I am, that’s fer sure. π
He’ll put the kybosh to the whole, ‘It’s way too much work, too intense, too many different things to do, blah blah blah’ chorus’, which is sung by the Realtor-Blogger Tabnernacle Choir. π
Brian Brady says:
Well, well, well. A little smoke didn’t keep you from being your ol’ ornery self today.
Let’s reinforce your theory, shall we?
Over the past three days, I told family in Phoenix and New Jersey to keep checking Bloodhoundblog.com for my progress during the evac. (Thanks, Jeff)
Two Phoenix friends called today and asked if I knew Russell Shaw after finding out we were okay. I won’t be surprised if BHB added 2-3 emails from my database to the subscriptions.
Colleen Kulikowski (from Florida) handled my new blog with information about the fire; she’s the most popular author on mortgageratesreport.com
Q-Why do you think that is?
A-People want local information.
Conclusion: There is a definitive benefit for a Realtor to provide it to his/her “farm”.
Let’s ask Kris; I’ll bet 20% of the homeowners in Scripps Ranch found her information these past 3 days in the search engines.
October 24, 2007 — 8:44 pm
Jeff Brown says:
Just a little ornery — but Spenser is a pretty good guy.
>Let’s ask Kris; I’ll bet 20% of the homeowners in Scripps Ranch found her information these past 3 days in the search engines.
Bet you’re right. But since you’ve mentioned Kris, now the rest of the ‘choir’ will probably chime in. π
October 24, 2007 — 8:53 pm
Russell Shaw says:
Yes, the questions in terms of relative importance are: 1.) Are you alive? 2.) Do you know Russell Shaw?
LOL !!
And I love this post, Jeff.
October 24, 2007 — 10:10 pm
Jeff Brown says:
I get it! π
Who doesn’t know Russell Shaw?!
Thanks Russ.
October 24, 2007 — 11:31 pm
Todd Carpenter says:
One thing to add. It seems like coming up with lots and lots of content is the primary hurdle in building a hyperlocal blog. My thought is, why not choose a neighborhood that has a lot going on. Not just the school play. Why not single out the hippest hottest neighborhoods in an entire city. The place to be. Neighborhoods with bars, art galleries, restaurants, etc…
These are the neighborhoods where people from other neighborhoods come to visit, and then wish they could move into. They are inherently higher valued and more transient (because folks eventually settle down in the burbs).
Then go to these art galleries, bars and restaurants and get the owners to post on the blog about their business. Leave any and all advertising off. Make the blog a neighborhood resource, and let just about anyone promote themselves for free. Well, except other RE Agents.
October 25, 2007 — 12:00 am
Kris Berg says:
>Why not single out the hippest hottest neighborhoods in an entire city. The place to be.
When we first moved to Scripps Ranch in 1989, we asked a friend who lived there where the “hot spots” were. He directed us to the grocery store. I’m afraid it’s too late for us.
Who’s Russell Shaw?
October 25, 2007 — 8:59 am
Steve Belt says:
Jeff, I’m listening and preparing to act. I’d like to be better at my broader blog, but wouldn’t we all?
What I’ve learned from my broader blog is that once people know about it, they pay attention. I’m directing all of my prospects there, and reaction is very favorable. I can’t imagine how favorable the reaction would be if the blog were packed with only information that was relevant to their neighborhood.
October 25, 2007 — 11:09 am
Daniel Rothamel says:
Jeff,
That post is yet another masterpiece. Our chief farm area has about 4,200 hundred homes, and we are getting ready to not only launch a blog, but also a web forum. I’ll let you know how it goes.
I’m with you on this one, and as Kanye West says on his latest album– “You can pop the trunk, I’ll pop the hood– Ferrari.”
October 25, 2007 — 11:52 am
Jeff Brown says:
Todd – I’m beginning to remember why I liked you. π
Of course, that idea would present multiple gold mines without a doubt.
Most neighborhoods offer that opportunity to one extent or the other, but as Kris points out, getting excited about the sale on top sirloin at Von’s kinda falls short. π
The potential for some very cool and dynamic synergy is huge. Though I’ve always included leveraging neighborhood businesses as part of the hyper-local strategy, your idea Todd, could very well turbo charge it, given the proper neighborhood.
In a word — brilliant — and thanks.
October 25, 2007 — 2:52 pm
Jeff Brown says:
Kris — I still maintain you guys are the best positioned agents I know for this approach.
>Iβm afraid itβs too late for us.
If you’re talking about the kind of area to which Todd refers, yep — too late, because Scripps Ranch was never that animal anyway.
Look what it is though.
1. High tech savvy — with computers in 90-98% of the homes.
2. Much better educated than the average neighborhood.
3. The perfect maturity factor as an area, especially as it relates to SD county specifically.
4. You guys already enjoy better, or potentially better name recognition than most, if not all your competition.
5. You know where to access the local info re: schools, sports, churches/temples, entertainment, etc.
6. You have experience running a successful team, which means you already have an in-house labor force.
7. Who knows Scripps Ranch better than the Bergs? Nobody, and by a wide margin.
8. You live in Scripps Ranch, which gives you a nice leg up. It’s not necessary by any stretch, but it sure helps.
9. Your company is huge and well respected in San Diego — just more credibility from square #1.
10. You’re the Blogging Princess — how could it fail? π
October 25, 2007 — 3:08 pm
Ken Smith says:
I am sure that those who feel this is to much work are the same that feel any type of proactive marketing is to much work. This is a good thing IMO, if all agents got proactive then I would have to work a lot harder to do the volume we do π .
October 25, 2007 — 4:03 pm
Brian Wilson says:
Nice, friendly banter, Jeff. Although, if I had to between a Ferrari and Fillmore from “Cars,” I’d go with Fillmore β he’s a lot funnier.
Brian Wilson, Zolve.com
October 25, 2007 — 4:05 pm
Brian Wilson says:
I left out a word —
If I had to *choose* between…
October 25, 2007 — 4:06 pm
Jeff Brown says:
Ken — You make an excellent point. For years I used to have great closings in December and January. This was due to working with folks inear and during the holiday season. Few agents want to work much after Halloween.
It’s the same principle. Realtors have never been known for their strong work ethic. This is how in ’77 or ’78, at that point in history, one of those two years was THE biggest volume home resale years in California since ’46.
The CA Assoc. of Realtors’ own numbers that year showed a turnover rate (for the calendar year) of over 70%. You could’ve been in a coma for half that year and made a good living for Heaven’s sake.
Competing against real estate agents is your best chance at winning in the business world.
October 25, 2007 — 7:52 pm
Eric Blackwell says:
@Ken;
Spot on with that point. Folks in Louisville…don’t read this post…(grin)
There is a hurdle that must be crossed either in terms of time or money for acquiring customers. In the old days, this was sending postcards and mailers and becoming the “neighborhood expert” read: Geographic farming. This is simply a media change. Not a strategy change IMO…
Those of us who do it are seeing the results…We can chart our own ROI and see whether or not the return is there **cough**it is**cough**.
@Kris– (re: who’s Russell Shaw) too funny. Between Russell’s pencil sharpener and your wit..when will I learn not to drink Orange juice while reading posts…(smile)
Eric
October 26, 2007 — 4:37 am
Jeff Brown says:
Eric — Thanks for the ‘feet on the street’ support. π
>This is simply a media change. Not a strategy change IMOβ¦
I agree in general, Eric.
However, because of the massive (relatively speaking) amount of info you’ll have there, there will not only be measurably more penetration of the farm ‘proper’, but the business generated by the site outside the farm will increase too. In fact, you’ll create several separate ‘long tails’, or in RE babble, ‘circles of influence’.
For instance, what if there’s a Little League in your neighborhood in which the farm kids play? Everyone attending games when you’re there, or your team is there, is constantly exposed to your operation. They’ll ask, ‘who is the guy always taking pix/videos? Oh, That’s Steve Berg — he’s the Scripps Ranch RE agent — you don’t know him? EVERYBODY knows Steve!
That little vignette will happen over and over at schools, churches/temples, the local Dave & Buster’s (if you have one) etc. The virus, as in real life, will not be contained to your farm, but will spread everywhere you go — making you a very positive ‘Typhoid Mary’. π
The other difference is the difference this ‘change in media’ makes in the number of homes, heck, the number of farms you can handle.
I contend an well organized team can handle several farms, once they get the mechanics down. The guy who is getting one going in the midwest, grew up in his town, and not only knows where all the bodies are buried, he probably buried some of them. π
October 26, 2007 — 8:16 am
Kris Berg says:
I have not confirmed this, but I suspect you win the Longest Post in the History of Blogging honor, Jeff.
October 26, 2007 — 8:39 am
Eric Blackwell says:
@Kris–careful! You may not want to let folks know that there is a prize for that! (grin)
@Jeff-WTHeck is a Dave and Busters? (just looked it up in my Thesaurus…watering hole??)
Eric
October 26, 2007 — 8:52 am
Jeff Brown says:
Kris — Wow — that’s two wins in one week. First the Black Pearl, now this. π
Sadly, brevity is the result of a far better quality of writing than I’ve been able to demonstrate, at least so far. Also, most bloggers, including the other contributors on this one, didn’t arrive at school on the little bus, as I did. π
I’m not proud though — I’ll take a win anywhere I can get it. π
By the way, when are duck nachos on your schedule?
October 26, 2007 — 9:03 am
Jeff Brown says:
Eric — Dave and Buster’s is a restaurant/bar/video games extravaganza. Their food is pretty good, as is the atmosphere. Kids love the games side to death. Here’s a link to their site.
http://www.daveandbusters.com/
October 26, 2007 — 9:13 am