You hear it here, you hear it there (there being here), and you know it in your heart. Real estate is so darn personal.
Ah, the personal touch! That is why I blog, and why I am very responsive to my emails and voicemail. That is why I love, and my clients love, the ability to electronically sign contracts and to view all contracts online from any Wi-Fi hotspot in the Delta Quadrant. Heck, what’s more personal than that daily auto-generated online update of home sales activity in your neighborhood… with MY PICTURE at bottom and YOUR NAME at the top?
I know what you are thinking – All that stuff is impersonal, but we are in a “people” business. Well, it depends on which “people” we are talking about. It’s a matter of communication, which we all know requires a sender and a receiver. When wearing the sender hat, I need to know in what form my client prefers to receive, which means I need to listen carefully to what my clients are telling me.
Times, they are a-changin’. That doesn’t mean that our business is becoming, can become, fully automated and physically detached. It simply means that our world is different now, and we are redefining “personal”. The ways in which we interact today are dramatically different than yesterday’s methods (smoke signals and dot-dot-dash). My children phone me from their bedrooms asking for the ETA of dinner, and they IM me from 100 feet removed to tell me that the Jonas Brothers are coming to town (to marry THEM!). I suspect they visit my home blog periodically to take a peak at the Trulia side bar widget of our active listings just to gauge the likelihood that I will be available to drive carpool to the movies on Friday.
As agents, we work with a wide cross-section of people and personalities. The key is to understand their definition of “personal”. My grandmother does not have a Meebo account, and you won’t find her on Facebook; she is the type of person who would prefer a phone call, a personal visit, and contracts in triplicate. My typical Qualcomm client, however, would be happy to never to lay eyes on me, and not because he has seen me in the mornings. His “personal” is my grandmother’s “impersonal”. Most clients fall somewhere in between, but the scales are rapidly tipping.
So, why do agents cling to antiquated practices? Because they are out of touch. Their dial is stuck on Talk Radio, while their clients are all hip-hop all day. Sure, your “music” speaks to you, but are you tuned into your clients?
Presenting the Offer IN PERSON
I am already bracing myself for the counter arguments, but personal presentation of the offer by the buyer’s agent is mostly a dumb idea in today’s environment. Fax machines and scanners have made this time-honored ritual about as contemporary as Wayne Newton. “But it gives me a chance to explain the nuances of the contract and to put a personal face on my clients”, you say. If you are listening to the sellers in today’s market, you will hear that they do not want to spend an hour at dinner time hearing your pitch. They have spent weeks or months being inconvenienced by the promenade of strangers through their home. They have their own agent whom they have entrusted to represent them, and who is fully capable (in theory) of presenting the offer on your behalf. To demand an audience when the audience doesn’t want to see the show does nothing to further your (or your client’s) agenda.
I recently had a listing agent insist that I present in person. I was happy to do so, but sitting across from his client at the table, it became instantly obvious to me that she, more than anything else at that moment, wanted one of us out of that room. The agent on the other hand, who was the textbook throwback with no website or email, was visibly puffed with pride that he had delivered a living, breathing member of his network to the negotiating table. Who were we really doing this for?
Then, as a listing agent, I have seen agents virtually assure that their buyers would never see an accepted offer. Through sloppy appearance, poorly chosen words or outright stupidity (“My clients like your home ‘OK’, but there is so much they would have to fix to make it habitable given their superior and distinguished tastes”), they alienated the sellers irreparably.
So, how do you convey emotion, sentiment, and other intangible influencing factors absent face time? The Sappy Cover Letter, of course.
The Sappy Cover Letter
Make no mistake, this is a powerful tool and should be used with great care. Every offer should include the sappy cover letter. Crafted well, not every seller will buy into it, but none will be put off. At a minimum, they will be amused by your ol’ college try, and with a little luck and creative writing skill, it just might work.
On a cautionary note, be careful what you write. We know your client wants to buy the home for pennies on the dollar, and we know that you want to be the one responsible for hammering out the smoking deal, but insults and threats have no place in the sappy cover letter. I received two recently which serve as ideal examples of bad letters happening to good people, and I suspect the agent’s clients were unaware of the lobbying taking place on their behalf.
My clients and I believe that we are currently in a Buyer’s Market. We also believe that the bathrooms could use some updating.
Nice. What they just told my clients was that they are in charge and that the (8-year-old) bathrooms suck. The sellers like their bathrooms, and now they don’t like the buyers. The agent killed his own offer dead.
Our clients have narrowed their search down to their top two favorites and have decided to write an offer on both. The other property is actually their first choice.
Just in case we might have missed the point, they proceeded to list all of the ways in which they found my client’s home inferior to their first choice. What the sellers heard: “I am but a pawn in your negotiating game, and you do not like my home nor do you have any real intention of buying it.” Another offer killed at the hands of the procuring cause.
Here would be an example of a good sappy letter:
“Mr. and Mrs. Captcha are Ph.Ds in the biotech field, their life work being the search for a cure for cancer. While they enjoy extensive travel abroad in connection with their third-world missionary obligations, they look forward to making their permanent residence in this, the most desirable neighborhood in this great land of freedom we call America. They welcome the opportunity to raise their young quintuplets in the magnificent home you have made and would be honored if you would allow them to continue your legacy of love and family values. Oh, and they really adore the 14th Century motif, and won’t be changing a thing! Please tell us the gargoyles convey!”
I double-dare you to deliver a powerful message like that in person! Then you can beat them up on price. After all, the bathrooms are hideous!
Not Your Grandmother’s “Personal”
The key to providing exceptional representation is giving the client what they want, how they want it, which means you have to listen. As I type, Steve is meeting with a client to get contracts signed in the client’s home. Steve knows this is the client’s preference, his definition of service. Others would find this an intrusion, and would rather meet at the office, while still others want ”just the fax, ma’am”. To be an effective agent today, you need to embrace the new while every so often dusting off the old. If you are representing my grandmother, don’t rely on email. But, if you want to talk to my children, you need to be their Facebook friend, and it’s my children and yours who will be buying and selling the homes of tomorrow.
Chris says:
Prefer doing things online. I’m working with a mortgage broker and some clients now that just love email. Love it, its so quick and easy.
The leading edge of my generation is just starting to buy homes, but in the next 5-10 years you will see a flood. Personal has changed, we have no problem being personal over email.
October 17, 2007 — 1:44 pm
Vicki Moore says:
I recently had a buyer agent want to present her offer while her clients were present. Yes, the buyers, sellers and both agents. Yeah, right. She said, “Don’t you want to meet my buyers?” Do they have money? Are they pre-approved? What’s the offer price? The answers were no; yes – by his father – and it sucked.
I too present the sappy letter. If the buyers have been married in the past two years, they’re newly weds and I include a wedding photo. Whatever is interesting and appealing about the buyer goes in the letter. I have a client who cares for the baby gorillas at the zoo. Great photo.
If you as the buyer agent present me with a sappy letter, the seller will never see it. This is a business decision – get the most money possible. I don’t want them to wake up a month from now saying I could have gotten more money if I wasn’t so darn nice. I want the seller to become detached from selling it to the cute, white, married couple with the dog and one cute, white, blond boy and one girl. That way we all stay out of a lawsuit for a discriminatory HUD violation.
Great article. I guess you hit a hot spot for me. 🙂
October 17, 2007 — 1:57 pm
Benn says:
*Disclaimer- this is Benn & Lani in the car between Austin & Fort Worth somewhere*
Is Greg paying you by the character? He owes you for 7,707 without the title! DANG!
Just teasing 😉 Kris, this is a seriously great article that transcends Real Estate really- this is a wonderful summation of the state of affairs in the current tech environment vs. the hands on environment. Most people still don’t get that there is a delicate balance between the two- you can’t rely on either to be applicable to ALL clients.
I hope this one is submitted to the carnival…
October 17, 2007 — 2:00 pm
Athol Kay says:
You lost me at mention of the Delta Quadrant Kris. That’s really only meaningfully accessible by wormhole, I’m pretty sure you’re making that up.
October 17, 2007 — 2:23 pm
Ron says:
It is funny (and discouraging) how many agents simply ignore the client’s personal preference. As a current buyer, I have tried half a dozen times to get my agent to communicate via email, but she won’t She waits three days to respond to my email, then sends a garbled note that ends with “you should call my cell, it’s easier for me.”
At work, I have negotiated multi-million dollar licensing deals almost entirely through email and IM. You’re telling me that I can’t ask a question about some dumb house over email because it’s too hard for you??????
October 17, 2007 — 2:29 pm
Kris Berg says:
Ron & Chris – You are the majority, but this can run both ways. I have seen agents continue to email excel attachments to clients who barely remember which room their computer is in – Not exactly the way to connect with their audience. This is the exception, of course. Most err on the side of not being technologically streamlined and inclined enough, and these are the agents who will never see this post – They are off buying replacement inserts for their daytimers.
>If you as the buyer agent present me with a sappy letter, the seller will never see it.
Vicki, if I am the buyer’s agent, they will, because I address it to the client, care of the agent. This forces your hand, and you have to present it with the offer. I don’t agree with discrimination/fair housing violation risks, but I do stop short of including a photo. Let’s face it, if a seller wanted to discriminate, they could do it based on the name on the offer.
>Is Greg paying you by the character? He owes you for 7,707 without the title!
Benn – Since you are in the car, you probably didn’t see the picture of the REALLY BIG Blackberry. I hear Greg pays big bonuses for ginormous cell phone photos!
Athol – 🙂 I actually, pinky-swear, thought of you when I typed those words.
October 17, 2007 — 3:37 pm
Athol Kay says:
/blush
October 17, 2007 — 4:25 pm
Brian Brady says:
Kris-
Your articles make me think, re-read, think, re-read with questions, and think more.
Client communications do vary. The widespread use of cell phones makes my job difficult because I prefer to have 30 minutes of uninterrupted time- It’s hard to take a loan application while people are ordering McDonald’s.
I have a possibly stupid question that comes from my background in “creative financing”. When presenting an offer with seller financing, is it advisable for a buyer’s agent to present to the seller in person so as to adequately explain the net effect?
October 17, 2007 — 8:33 pm
Kris Berg says:
Brian – What’s seller financing? 🙂
October 17, 2007 — 8:56 pm
Scoot says:
I’ve never used the “sappy cover sheet”. May be a good thing to try, but I’m not sure about the pic, that may be too much – a little too sappy.
Good article. You’re a very funny girl!
October 17, 2007 — 9:33 pm
Dru Bloomfield says:
Kris, So funny and very true.
I call my teenaged son… no answer. I text him and hear back immediately. I know I’m not alone!
An agent in our office shared a story recently. Email back and forth with her prospective client was slow and seemingly stalled. New agent texted info on a new home and heard back immediately. The transaction was completed pretty much via texting.
October 18, 2007 — 5:59 am
Jeremy Hart says:
Kris, great article. Specifically on the issue of adjusting our actions to meet the client’s preference, I thought it was a good reminder. I know that personally, I get really comfortable doing the things I’m good at and as momentum picks up I become a bull in a china shop. Sometimes, it’s good to slow down the pace and get that face time. Clients appreciate it, we’re able to focus … nice job, I agree, think this should be a Carnival post. I’ll still send IMs from another room though.
October 18, 2007 — 7:06 am
Daniel Rothamel says:
Great post Kris. Meeting your clients expectations of service is absolutely critical.
The thing that I find interesting about things like Facebook and such is that they ARE social. I meet people all the time that I might not have otherwise had the opportunity to know. Hopefully, I will get to meet them face-to-face as well.
October 18, 2007 — 9:20 am
Ken Smith says:
People today are always looking for ways to make their lives simpler and more convenient. Why would anyone waste each others time with a face to face negotiation? In under a minute I can convey the strength of my buyers, their interest level, and more with a simple phone call. Then you follow it up with a simple email (or fax cover sheet for the dinosaur agents) with the offer as an attachment.
October 18, 2007 — 12:35 pm
Jim Frey says:
Kris: exactomundo! all my presentations are in person….with the letter, pictures even (?), pre-approval from mortgage broker….this puts a “human” element to the transaction….
October 18, 2007 — 2:05 pm
Steve Berg says:
I was under the impression that this was a nationally respected blog. So why did everyone miss the most important part. While Kris was posting this…, “Steve is meeting with a client to get a contract signed in the client’s home.”
Tough crowd.
October 18, 2007 — 6:19 pm
Brian Brady says:
I caught the irony, Steve. I was not going to break a man-rule, though.
October 18, 2007 — 7:48 pm
Steve Berg says:
Brian – Very smart.
October 19, 2007 — 6:31 am
Ben Bach says:
You are right on the money with this article Kris
Be Great
Benjamin
http://kitchener-waterloo-real-estate-investments.com/
October 19, 2007 — 8:22 am
Ardell says:
Timely read for me. My daughter is signing me into MySpace today so I can see her latest tattoo designs on her various clients.
We have to walk side by side with whomever we are walking with. If it’s granny, we walk differently than if it’s our children. There’s no one way that suits “US” best, that also serves the needs of all of the people we come in contact with.
Our methods need to be many, and varied appropriately. But then is there a Mom in the world who doesn’t “get that”?
October 19, 2007 — 2:12 pm
Eric Blackwell says:
Kris-
Great job! a true thinking person’s post! (that’d be a compliment!). I think the REALTOR and the real estate industry MUST adapt to the preferences of consumers…
They determine what is personal. They determine what is professional. and (of course..) they vote with their money. As Ken Smith noted above…the consumer is looking for convenience. It doesn’t come at the expense of being personal. It redefines it.
I view it as simply a matter of the Golden Rule of Arts and Sciences at play…He who has the gold. Makes the rules. We ARE in the people pleasing business.
Congrats on the nomination…
Eric
October 22, 2007 — 4:23 am