The metric would be simple.
Example: Staten Island (pop 474k) has 4x the gun ownership per capita of the Bronx (pop 1.4m).
That’s quoted from a Tweet, and I would expect that subsequent Tweeters pointed out the absurdity of comparing very-low-crime Staten Island to very-high-crime The Bronx. Even so, the essential difference is population density, not firearms ownership: Friction begets fractiousness.
But in typical Marxist Upside Down game fashion, the double-dip dipshit is on to something, she just has it ass-backwards. Her claim is that legal gun ownership denotes bad neighborhoods, which would only be true in big cities – where measuring gun crimes would be a better RiotScore™ tell.
But that one metric might be all the RiotScore™ that’s needed: Gun-crime arrests in a one-mile radius in the past year – with any number above zero being a red flag.
Gun owners don’t commit crimes, criminals do – with whatever weapon is at hand.
In other news:
CNBC: Homeowners got $2 trillion richer during the first three months of the year.
Mike DelPrete: Offerpad and Its More Profitable Flavor of iBuying.
Santa Barbara News-Press: Feckless Santa Barbara: woke, broke and on fire.
The Bend Bulletin: Oregon will allow homeless individuals to pitch tents on public land.
J. D. Tuccille: Insane Lumber Prices Show How Governments Break Economies.
CNBC: Deutsche Bank warns of global ‘time bomb’ coming due to rising inflation.
Pedro Robinson: You’ll Own Nothing and You’ll Be Happy…Yikes. From whence does single-family detached housing derive its market value? Asked another way, what happens to values in fee-simple neighborhoods when too many homes are investor-owned?
Real Clear Investigations: Almost Overnight, Standards of Color-Blind Merit Tumble Across American Society.
Kenny Xu: Critical Race Theory’s Poisonous Roots Trace Back To Harvard University.