Here’s a puzzler: A confederation of freaks incapable of propitious reproduction holds the future hostage to their absurd demands. What happens next?
The future shrugs.
Reason: Should Remote Workers Pay a Tax for the ‘Privilege’ of Using Their Home as an Office? Most “financial news” is telegraphy about where the margins are getting squeezed. But: Still: What gonophs!
CNBC: Morgan Stanley says housing discrimination has taken a huge toll on the economy. We need more borrowers!
Kevin Williamson: Why Trump supporters are here for good.
Matt Vespa: Pollster: It’s Curious How Biden Underperformed Hillary Clinton In Every City…Except These Four.
The Federalist: Why President Trump Has A Strong Supreme Court Case To Contest Pennsylvania.
First Things: The Fury of Fatherlessness. h/t Teri Lussier.
Thomas Johnson says:
Re: https://reason.com/2020/11/12/should-remote-workers-pay-a-tax-for-the-privilege-of-using-their-home-as-an-office/
Why do employers get unreimbursed use of the remote employee’s property? If my dining room table becomes my employer required workplace, my employer should pay me what he otherwise pays to rent office space, buy broadband and provide security for his intellectual property, where I perform my duties. If I must store my wax fruit bowl for his profit, I expect compensation.
November 15, 2020 — 2:05 pm
Greg Swann says:
I’ve got a better idea: Up your own organization. I find all of this both pathetic and funny, especially considering that remote employees can live anywhere – and be of any nation’s citizenship. With double-redirect out-sourcing – I hire an American subcontractor who hires the foreign employees – I’m out of the 1040 game entirely.
November 15, 2020 — 2:14 pm