I’ve been waiting for this for a long time. From PC World:
Forget phone numbers and e-mail addresses. The era of the Internet handle is emerging.
Instead of having to remember a phone number or an e-mail address, in a few short years we might simply find somebody remotely over the Internet via his or her handle, another word for an Internet nickname.
It would be similar to the way handles are used in instant messaging or Skype, except that the handle would apply to all modes of getting in touch, including a phone number or e-mail address (or several of each). In my case, my Skype handle, “MattaboyBoston,” could become the way you would reach me.
“People will no longer seek each other’s phone numbers or email address[es] when establishing personal or working relationships,” wrote Gartner analyst Adib Ghubril in a report on mobile predictions for 2012 and beyond. “Instead, they will ask each other, ‘What’s your handle?’ ”
Ghubril said that handles will have a huge advantage. They could remain unchanged for a long time, if not for life.
The idea is simply indirect addressing: If I depend on your physical address (or your phone number or email address), when you make a change, I am lost. But if I use an indirect addressing scheme — I address you by name, or by “handle” as this article avers — then the indirect address can always accurately reflect your current contact information, even if you change it twelve times a day.
The responsibility for maintaining accurate contact information moves from dozens or thousands of distracted and loosely motivated people to the one person most strongly motivated to make sure your messages get through — you.
As with all predictions, the ideas discussed in the PC World article are kludgy and stoopid. This all will actually happen as a beneficial side-effect of cloud-based data storage. We talked about this over the summer in discussions of a hypothetical CRM called Heidi:
An email comes in over the transom. The spambot says it’s not spam and the sender is not already in your CRM database, so let’s extract as much information as we can from the email. With a name and an email address we can probably get the sender’s full contact information, and possibly a whole lot more.
Make that first contact a phone call instead. Caller ID is lame, but Google is not. From the phone number, can you get back to a name? A location? From those, can we effect the same kind of searches discussed above?
There’s more: Once your CRM knows a name, it should be watching for any changes in publicly-available databases that should be reflected in your private CRM database. That is to say, your CRM should be maintaining itself.
All of this will happen. Probably not as slick as I can imagine things, but faster than you think it will.
Mike says:
You can’t possibly think this would be a good thing.
December 9, 2011 — 4:54 pm
Greg Swann says:
> You can’t possibly think this would be a good thing.
Obviously I do. I don’t care for rejoinders in that form, though. In addition to being coercive, your retort leaves me in complete ignorance of your actual objection. I believe everything I say — in detail. I will be happy to answer any question you might have, but first I will need for you to have one.
December 10, 2011 — 9:22 am
Robert Worthington says:
I love the Handle idea as long as I can go into a setting menu and change things around for people who spam me, ect.
December 16, 2011 — 10:27 am
Ray Kasbarin says:
Anything that removes friction, confusion and steps is always a good die. It’s the total nature of technology as we always eventually go to path of least resistance. This does not increase spam nor open any security issues. It’s actually safer as you control where your handle points. And it avoids people connecting to old data or worse duplicate name.
But mobiles should be considered a web handle since they are unique most people are not changing their numbers. Portability laws have helped.
Using your mobile, twitter and email as a web handle or Peronal Digitl Index TM – is already in use at http://cvlynk.com
December 19, 2011 — 11:29 am