This is from mail from Thomas Johnson of ERA Houston, which, among other things, coins the terms “Zestifarm” and “Zestifarming” for the various ways one can pee on the tree in Zillow:
I love the marking your farm analogy. I walk my dog, Sophie, every evening and I have noticed that she marks everything that is of higher than average height: a clump of grass, a twig, a lump of Spanish moss, whatever. I liken that to canine text messaging a quick sniff, squirt and move on. When we get to the mailboxes, it is different. That is much more interesting. There is lots of sniffing and squirting. I guess we could call that pee mail. My takeaway is that there are so many little repetitions that we can use to mark our Zestifarms. And, the price is right.
Less like pee mail, more like Twitter. Even so, I just quoted that part to make the girls squeal. But: Nothing focuses the mind like an apposite metaphor. One theory says that dogs mark their territory so they can find their way home if they get lost. Hence the poor, lost Rain Dogs.
Dog owners know better: Dogs mark to cover the scent left by other dogs. To have your pee peed on is to become an unpuppy:
I spent the night tossing and turning thinking about “marking my farm”. I think that an agent could take over the cyber neighborhood before the entrenched legacy agent/broker even knew what was happening. A while ago, I bought a cheap little program called “watermark it”. It enables you to digitally watermark photos. I bought it to protect my MLS photos, but it was banned by policy. My 4 AM revelation was to watermark my Zestifarm photos with a small web address. It would not hyperlink, but “Kilroy was here”.
This is something that I’ve been thinking about, but I hadn’t done anything about it until I got this mail. As I mentioned before, there is an even better “pee on the tree strategy” than listing homes for sale:
Instead of announcing homes for sale, walk the neighborhoods you farm, taking photos from the street or sidewalk of every one. Post those photos one at a time to Zillow. Doing this, you will have marked your entire territory, essentially in perpetuity. Anyone shopping your neighborhoods is going to run into you again and again. It seems reasonable to me that people will tend to investigate homes near those they might be interested in buying. What better way to establish yourself as the neighborhood expert than associating your name and contact information with every home they might turn to?
The problem with that idea is that a canonical library of photographs invites theft.
That’s Cameron and Ophelia with a watermark. That probably wouldn’t pass muster with the MLS mandatory mindlessness committee, and it wouldn’t serve Thomas’ objective of driving traffic back to his web site. But no one will ever steal a photo marked like that.
Here’s my question: Does it interfere too much with the image?
Technorati Tags: Zillow.com, real estate, real estate marketing, real estate photography
Austin Realtor's Wife says:
I think you’ve found a great balance with your watermark- it doesn’t impede that actual photo and the message of your photo still conveys. The image is rendered LESS useless to photo pirates, but still may be stolen- a pirate is a pirate is a pirate!
Did YOU use the “watermark it” program for this?
May 22, 2007 — 12:40 pm
Greg Swann says:
We looked at it on 20 photos, and we decided it’s a touch too weak. We also figured out how we could integrate Thomas Johnson’s idea with ours, and also how to watermark for the MLS. I’m working with a program called PicMark for the Macintosh, using images created in Adobe Illustrator and Adobe PhotoShop. I’ll probably write more about this tonight, when I’ve had a chance to perfect a strategy.
May 22, 2007 — 12:44 pm
dustin says:
For the purpose of watermarking, it definitely needs to be a bit darker… Even if someone stole the image, I wouldn’t know who the original owner was because I can’t make out the word “Bloodhound” or your website address.
May 22, 2007 — 1:09 pm
Dave Barnes says:
“Does it interfere too much with the image?”
No. I had to look twice to even see the watermark.
If you are really concerned about people stealing your work, then fill in the meta data for each photo. The really smart thieves will change/remove the meta data, but normal thieves (90+%) don’t even know it exists.
May 22, 2007 — 1:18 pm