I was born and raised in Southern California. Learned to swim in the ocean under the watchful eyes of local surfers we knew wouldn’t let us go permanently under. I’ve lived in the suburbs of L.A. and Orange County, and along its coast. Life in Manhattan Beach in the late 50’s to early 60’s is the closest thing to Heaven on earth we’ll ever know. From around eight years old or so, you could walk anywhere without adult supervision, sans fear of anything but not makin’ it home before Dark:30.
Just before turning 16 I opted to move from Orange County to San Diego to live with Dad. Mom wasn’t pleased, but understood the need for a boy of that age to be around his dad. It was only 100 miles down the 5, not exactly an intercontinental move. Just two months short of my 16th birthday, it wasn’t horrible timing.
A San Diegan for over 43 years now, I’ve seen it morph from a kind of citified, relatively hick free Mayberry, to what it is today, which is, I’m not sure what. If ya peer in closely, you might be able to see, as I certainly do, remnants of the barely surviving infrastructure of its Mayberry past. But honestly? It’s just for show — we can’t go back.
None of this is really the point though, as I’m taking advantage of the platform here to harken back to days when character mattered, and political correctness meant you voted.
Even a month ago, if you’d told me I’d be seriously entertaining the idea of putting 59 years of SoCal in my rearview mirror, I’d of been confused as to why you’d even think such a thing. But for the first time in my life, the thought of leaving California doesn’t seem abhorrent to me.
I’m now thinkin’ the unthinkable — moving to another state.
At first I thought it was a transitory mood, melancholy brought on by California’s childish, mostly entitled electorate. Please don’t think I’m being unkind, as my words are being chosen carefully. But after a week of thinking, letting my emotions settle, it’s become clear to me, that what I see on the horizon is my own tipping point, comin’ at me like a runaway freight train.
I’m beginning to understand Peter’s viewpoint, in Grandpa’s humorous version of a well known bit of wisdom. “Always robbin’ Peter to pay Paul ends up with a sore Peter.” In California, the robbers evidently outnumber the robbees.
Something very simple happened to me yesterday while pickin’ up coffee ‘n pastry from Starbucks, in anticipation of an office meeting. Rightly or wrongly, it clarified for me what’d been doggin’ my mood since last Wednesday morning. The cashier didn’t realize I’d ordered a large drink, and wasn’t charging me. Without thinking, I asked him if he’d forgotten the Venti pumpkin coffee concoction I’d ordered. (Ordered by the lady I was meeting. I’d never forfeit my ManCard so cavalierly.) He quickly turned to the lady getting my stuff ready, who verified I’d indeed also ordered that drink.
He smiled warmly, then said, “Integrity, much appreciated.”
It occurred to me that if I’d been in East Butt Wart, North Dakota, (Is Starbucks even there yet?) my integrity would’ve been assumed, as opposed to being so rare as to be worthy of comment. Think about that. By merely pointing out a potential, albeit very simple mistake, I was thanked for being a man of integrity.
That, my friends, is California in a nutshell.
That moment helped me understand why I’d been so down in the dumps, and the uneasy feeling the past week. In California, integrity stands out like a turd in a pail of milk. And yes, those who just voted in the majority here wouldn’t flinch at a turd representing integrity in that analogy.
As I’ve so often said, there are two kinds of people in this world. Those who wanna learn how to fish, rising and falling based upon their own merit — and those who simply wanna take my fish, rising and falling based upon my merit.
Ya can’t swing a dead cat in California without hittin’ a buncha folks who want your fish. Most of ’em are either so ignorant or stoopid, they express joy when told many who voted other than they did have been and are continuing to move out. They don’t realize they’ve bought into to the whole Golden (Goose) State propaganda, and are about to find out who’s really been skinnin’ all those cats — or better put, layin’ all those golden eggs. Furthermore, it hasn’t dawned on them that we’re takin’ our golden egg layers with us.
Another way of describing the two kinds of people is producers and takers.
I’m a proud, lifelong producer.
Are you in the 5% top wage earners nationwide? The country’s median income is under $50,000 — around $68,000 for dual income households.
Are you aware that Californians hit the second highest income tax bracket BEFORE they hit the median income?! If they make over $1 Million they pay over 10%. We’ll revisit this later.
In my city, the sales tax is 9.5%. You can’t make up something that stoopid. And that’s less than L.A.’s 9.75%. In other words, buy a new $30,000 car there, and your registration and sales tax alone would total $3,358!
Back to high wage earners. You know, the producers. The ones the takers need to survive.
Imagine someone in the top 5%, a Californian. His IRS tax rate is 35% for every penny he makes over about $373,000. In CA he pays 9.3% on every penny he earns over about $47,000 — less than the national median. Let’s do some fourth grade math.
For every dollar he earns above $47,000 his combined income tax bracket is 34.3%. He pays 42.3% combined from $172-374,000 or so. From $374-1 MIlion he owes 44.3Β’ on each and every one of those dollars. If, God forbid, he earns more than a million bucks? His new combined tax bill will run 45.3Β’ for every dollar he earned over that amount.
How’re those SoCal beaches lookin’ to ya now?
If our hardworking, well paid taxpayer moves to say, Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington, Wyoming, New Hampshire, or Tennessee, he’ll pay no state income tax on what he earns on the job. (New Hampshire and Tennessee tax only dividend and interest income, not job income.)
What? You thought folks were movin’ to Pig Fart, Wyoming for the weather?
Our Golden State (Now that’s ripe, isn’t it?) taxpayer will save a bit less than a dime for every buck he makes by simply calling Bekins. For blue voters in CA, that means if he makes half a mil a year, he’s saving just under $50,000 a year by moving. For those in the Bay Area, in round numbers, that’s about a million bucks in 10 short years.
What would you do with an extra million dollars in your Levis every decade?
Things that make ya go hmmm.
Tom Johnson says:
I have been screaming to every Californian that will listen willingly or unwillingly (you too, Mr. Brian Brady) that most folks who earn above median pay probably work in an office. Now, wait for it, Texas has air conditioned offices and they look a lot like California air conditioned offices. What’s different is that the money you don’t send on a one way trip to Sacramento stays in your pocket. When you take your time off, you can buy a couple round trip tickets to your beloved Collyforneeya (a little Governator lingo there), stay in five star accommodations and have change left over. Repeat over a career and maybe you don’t buy so many plane tickets and invest the difference in some Texas income producing property and have what ever your purpose might be, paid for, free and clear. Now, Texas might not have free range eucalyptus lime soak pedicure stations on every corner, but there is a reason why Texas is hiring.
November 10, 2010 — 9:30 pm
Jeff Brown says:
Somehow I’m unable to connect the good folks I know in Texas with free range eucalyptus lime soak pedicure stations. π
TX is indeed hiring. One of the areas in which I do business has unemployment of under 6%. π
I couldn’t hang with their weather though, A/C and fireplaces notwithstanding. π
Love the people though.
November 10, 2010 — 9:49 pm
Doug Quance says:
“In California, integrity stands out like a turd in a pail of milk.”
Classic.
I don’t blame you to leave California. It is a shame that a majority of the population actually votes to keep things on the downhill slide.
November 10, 2010 — 10:00 pm
Jeff Brown says:
Seriously Doug, Rod Serling wouldn’t try to sell this script to CBS. Nobody would believe it.
November 10, 2010 — 10:05 pm
Sean M. Broderick, CCIM says:
Amen, Jeff..er, uh.. dude!.. I’m right behind you. Don’t leave me with these fish mongers. They just announced that the state budget deficit has grown to $25.4B since the $19B earlier in the year, but I do see a light at the end of the tunnel – unfortunately, it’s the light of the high speed rail coming into the Valley and moving fast, which needs more public funds once the engineering & environmental studies exhausted $2B. We’re going to be close to Sweden’s tax structure before they finish the first 100 miles of high speed public transit. It’s a MOT (matter of time) before you see the same European public unrest in SFO and LAX because someone will be forced to stop passing out the fish.
November 11, 2010 — 12:20 am
Elizabeth Evans says:
Do what so many Californians have done, establish a primary residence (and in many cases the business that pays the bills) in Nevada or Arizona (not a zero income tax state but nothing like California) and keep a second home in California.
California is nothing like it was when we were kids or even young adults. I had occasion to drive to and in San Francisco this week after an absence of at least fifteen years. Dirty, run down, and unbearable traffic, even at 1 PM. My folks used to point to New York (and John Lindsay in those days) with its high crime, filth, crowding and taxes as the best example of why smart folks lived west of the Mississipi. Don’t think they would draw the same conclusion today.
November 11, 2010 — 6:32 am
Jeff Brown says:
Hey Elizabeth — You won’t see me house huntin’ in AZ any time soon. My baked potato impression is terrible.
I have no idea where I’d move, if it comes down to it. Though I love the folks in both AZ & TX, they’re not on the list, as I’m a weather wuss. π
November 11, 2010 — 8:55 am
Al Lorenz says:
Jeff, you already know the answer is to leave. California hates business, and it isn’t changing. If this country hadn’t show a willingness to change a little over a week ago, I was going to start a plan to be free from it when needed. Go where you want. If you have been able to make it in California, you’ll really thrive elsewhere.
November 11, 2010 — 12:00 pm
Jeff Brown says:
Agreed, but we’re like millions of frogs in a giant kettle of water getting ever hotter. We keep saying the SoCal lifestyle is priceless. But now they’re showing us the real life meaning of priceless every April.
It ain’t what we meant!!
November 11, 2010 — 2:38 pm
Mike Mullin says:
Jeff, I may respond with more offline but our family left CA in 2004. After a stop in Las Vegas (I’m still in therapy for that!) for a couple of years we are now located in Spokane, WA.
Two quick observations:
1. Be careful – I’ve never been divorced but moving kind of results in a similar phenomena – after the first time it becomes pretty easy to become dissatisfied again.
2. CA is still a pretty special place relative to the rest of the country. I’m not sure any other state can replicate the natural beauty, diversity of opinion, highly educated population…. I’m not convinced the damage is irreparable.
WA is pretty nice!
November 11, 2010 — 6:41 pm
Jeff Brown says:
Thanks MIke — solid points.
I would never permanently divorce myself from San Diego. I’d maintain something here. Diversity of opinion? Yesterday’s onion rings have more value to me than that. π
As for the ‘highly educated’ population, you probably wanna take that one back. They just voted in a proven Moonbeam, with a rubber stamp legislature, who now don’t need anything but a simple majority to pass budgets. Educated morons would be more like it.
Jerry Brown makes Bill Clinton look like a rookie running for dog catcher. CA doesn’t have a chance. We’re toast.
The damage isn’t irreparable. True enough. But at 59, lovin’ what I do (for the most part) I may be unwilling to pay $50-100K/yr waiting for the next cleansing cycle. Know what I mean, Verne?
November 11, 2010 — 6:51 pm
Teri Lussier says:
Please don’t move to Ohio. Can’t stand those wussy Californians pissing and moaning about 20 minute commutes, affordable housing, a work ethic, and friendly people. Don’t be fooled by our newly elected Blood Red Gov. Ohio isn’t for you. Stay away, Golden Boy, stay far far away.
November 11, 2010 — 9:30 pm
Jeff Brown says:
No chance, The Boss wouldn’t come with me. π
November 11, 2010 — 10:52 pm
FH says:
Jeff,
Google “Free State Project”… come join us in NH
-F
November 12, 2010 — 11:41 am
Michael Cook says:
I certainly miss California, but I would echo Mike’s comments above. Every state has its own problems. New York City is great, but the weather is not as nice and everyone is defined by their wallets. Great for developing work ethic, but not so great for becoming an all around person.
I have lived lots of places, Chicago, Detroit, San Francisco, New York City, Los Angeles and every place has its pluses and minuses.
And dont forget, we need someone on the ground when they start the Greece style work stoppages to close the budget gap. Wait, you mean we dont have enough money for the lavish public services, so we are going to stop producing things that make money to pay for those lavish government services until someone magically gives us more money to continue the lavish government service??? Am I talking about Greece, France, or California five years from now? Who knows…
November 12, 2010 — 1:07 pm
Jeff Brown says:
Geez, who are you really? Will the next thing outa your mouth be how much you miss Ronnie? π
Seriously, your point is on the money — pun intended. I’m tryin’ to think of a time in American history when a state the economic size of CA, was run by a governor subscribing to the political principles Jerry Brown does, while simultaneously having voted in a completely clone-like legislature.
In fact, it’s a trick question. It was CA, and Jerry Brown was in charge. The results were awesomely negative. You can look it up.
Which of the many cities you listed, would you prefer living, Michael? Or is there another you’d like to try?
November 12, 2010 — 1:15 pm
Jeff Brown says:
FH — I’ll check it out. But ‘BawldGuy in New Hampshire’ is probably more than a little bit oxymoronic. New England winters aren’t a selling point.
November 12, 2010 — 2:09 pm
Jonathan Rainer says:
Great post. I’m in Georgia, and I’ve heard of those producers like yourself leaving/considering leaving the state, but haven’t heard a first hand account.
My fear is that I will be taxed by the Feds to bail out California in a few years. I’m sure the “loans” they mask the bailout under will be casually forgiven with no press coverage on the matter. So, my kids and I will bear the burden of California’s irresponsible electorate….a new form of taxation without representation.
BTW, consider Georgia. There’s a push to eliminate the income tax here as well. There are still a few money pits on the government dole, but it’s a solid state with a balanced budget amendment. Good weather most of the time, too!
November 14, 2010 — 10:34 pm
Jeff Brown says:
Jonathan — Here’s the silver lining to a CA bankruptcy. With the conservatives firmly in charge of what happens in the House, who do you think will dare vote openly for another huge bailout? π Seems a large portion of ‘the people’ are mad, and aren’t gonna take it any more. They also, apparently, don’t care if those who go astray are Democrat OR Republican.
They already gave fair warning a couple Tuesdays ago.
November 14, 2010 — 10:58 pm
Jonathan Rainer says:
Jeff, you’re right. I hope the people stay mad for 2 years, though. With gridlock in Congress, they may forget why they were mad these past 22 months. Americans have a notoriously short political memory…they reelected Jerry Brown, right?
But, the other side of the equation is that the white house has a huge influence on where money is spent, and too often budgets for education and other Federal departments are blank checks for the President to spend as he sees fit. He and his staff could cloud a bailout behind ‘grants’ to the needy in CA.
Combine that with some established Republicans are easily swayed with earmark bribes and other such nonsense. They may not realize how mad their constituents really are. These old dogs could do further damage before getting the boot in 2012. You’ll have nearly every Representative from California voting for a bailout, knowing their 2012 opponent would run on them voting against a bailout of their great state.
I’m hopeful and smiling about the election results, but also realistic about politicians and their propensity to write checks against our grandchildren’s inheritance.
November 14, 2010 — 11:37 pm
Jeff Brown says:
Sean — If I do leave, I’ll give you a heads up. Seems Californians are gonna be the last to learn what real life is all about.
November 15, 2010 — 8:12 am
Mike Mullin says:
RE: No state incomes taxes in Georgia – yeah, that enticed me when I moved to WA as well. It’s a particularly important issue when living in a border town like Spokane – 20 minutes East and I could have lived in Idaho. I chose the state with no income tax.
Turns out there’s no free lunch. A state that doesn’t collect income tax still has to pay their bills somehow. In WA I pay a hefty business tax on gross commissions I’ve never had to pay in other states, and some of the WA’s other taxes are higher as well.
November 15, 2010 — 9:46 am
Jeff Brown says:
Hey Mike — In hindsight, and given Idaho’s much more positive approach to business, would you have been better off in Boise?
November 15, 2010 — 9:50 am
Mike Mullin says:
Jeff, we did spend 4 days in Boise checking it out. I LOVED the feel of their downtown area. Lots of people on bikes and sidewalk dinning. I also really like college towns.
Two things turned us off – and keep in mind this was June of 2007 – I felt Boise’s housing prices were way out of line and I was looking for beautiful surroundings. Boise is surrounded by gently rolling and dry terrain. The nearby reservoir was not very appealing. Not what I was looking for.
I’m now living amongst pine trees, with a lake in the backyard. That’s more of what I was looking for.
It’s an amazing process you need to go through when consciously making a decision on where to live, particularly when our respective industries allows us to go pretty much anywhere. In my case I can even be incredibly remote if I want as almost 100% of my business is done via phone, fax, and email these days.
My point is the decision of where to move takes both an inward analysis of your wants and desires and adequate time to test the waters on whatever location you are considering. I found it was a pretty tough process and I’m not sure I’m finished looking. π
November 15, 2010 — 10:04 am
Jeff Brown says:
Makes sense. I wonder what Boise’s home prices are like now though. The subjective always makes these decisions way more complicated, that’s for sure. As much as I love the Texas economy, it’s spirit, and especially its people, the weather keeps me away.
November 15, 2010 — 10:09 am
Wayne says:
I loved San Diego in the early 70’s. It’s just not the same anymore. Now there’s a Bank at Ocean Beach!!! Ugg.
December 2, 2010 — 11:06 pm