“But a deed cannot be both wise and unintended.” Greg Swann
Substitute goal for deed, and it’s still a profoundly affecting thought. In the context of Greg’s post, one could reasonably assume deed could be construed as goal.
The thrust of the post talks about the tactic of exposing your goals to the ‘public’, or at least a person(s) you know. The thinking is that you will tend to be more motivated by the fear of others knowing you not only failed, but failed by lack of commitment or best effort.
Clearly their are two schools of thought on this.
One is the unstated but obvious conclusion that using fear in a positive manner, as a motivator, will keep some folks on track to achieve the announced goal. Others go farther than a mere announcement — they set up fiercely painful penalties for failure. One such case was the woman who’d failed spectacularly time after time to lose weight which was life threatening.
Apparently she gathered her closest friends together to tell them the penalty for failure — running naked down the street in front of her neighbors. In other words, she established a penalty so severe, that would cause so much pain, her motivation to avoid the pain superseded her motivation to extend her life by losin’ the damn weight.
Though not my approach, whatever works, right?
As I commented in Greg’s post, I am in some ways, almost, but not quite against my will, my father’s son. I’m a pretty private guy, but he was extremely so. When he set goals his wife was fortunate to be in the know. Not kidding.
It was his preference, and now mine too, that if one doesn’t have a strong enough desire to bring about what the achievement of any particular goal brings, they shouldn’t set the goal in the first place. It’s not a value judgment on others. It’s like losing weight, gettin’ in shape, and eating a healthy, well rounded diet. There’s no one correct way.
I believe in keepin’ my personal and business goals to myself because I don’t set goals for which I don’t have a very strong desire to accomplish. It’s that simple. Again, I understand different M.O.s work for different folks. What works for one doesn’t necessarily work for the next guy.
Frankly, I’ve shared goals when I was younger. We all understand the whole accountability thing. But if I want something strongly enough to set a specific goal in writing, including the detailed strategy to get me there, I know when I’m not following the plan. Settin’ goals is a huge pain in the ass, at least from where I sit. It’s painstaking work. What began as, “I wanna make $X amount this year”, becomes real work when details of how it’s gonna be executed must be put down in real words, on real paper. For me, it begs the real question.
How badly do I want it?
I respect those who feel they benefit from having the world know what their goals are — and what they must do to make them reality. Again, whatever works. But those same folks don’t need a buddy callin’ periodically to make sure they drink enough water and consume enough calories to live another week. They’re motivated strongly enough to do that without goading. It’s a goal they reach every week. Furthermore, they don’t try to survive, they do it.
Yet they need to be goaded into making an extra six figures a year.
In my personal experience, I’ve achieved no ambitious goal for which I wasn’t massively motivated — from within. It’s a core belief with me. Before I set pen to paper, or put fingers to keyboard, I give intense thought and scrutiny to the strength of my desire. If I’m unwilling to do every single thing, big or small in it’s conquest, I don’t put it in writing. I like the way Greg said it even better.
“…the simple act of making an explicit, objective, undeniable commitment to your goals is the first step to achieving them. It’s doing that — or not doing it — that is the decisive factor.”
For me it comes down to a simple concept — words mean things.
Things we truly want to do, we do — we don’t try. As Greg puts it, we don’t play mind games when it matters to us greatly. Frankly, I’m a little more uncouth on that subject.
Failures and losers are always trying their best or, more cunningly deceptive, doing their best. I call BS. Whiny crap like that is why the vast majority of goals are stillborn. Do or don’t do — but stop sayin’ ‘try your best’ or worse, ‘do your best’, cuz you’re embarrassing yourself. Worst of all, those hearin’ that manure are embarrassed for you. I know, cuz I’ve been guilty more than once myself. Lookin’ back I still become a bit red-faced.
Not clear enough?
A core belief dictates I must believe I will accomplish any goal put into writing — before I start down the road to making it reality. It also dictates trying isn’t an option. I believe that’s a mind game played by those who need an excuse for failure. Again, I speak from a platform of sad experience.
It’s taken me from ‘that chubby blonde guy’ to a marathon runner. From the scrawny high school kid to competitive bodybuilder. From umpiring Little League games in shorts, to Division I college ball. From scrappin’ along in real estate to doing business in multiple states.
Even those with good intent will sometimes heap discouragement on your goals.
Dad had a 10 year business goal that was, to put it mildly, uncommonly ambitious. He barely had two quarters to rub together when he wrote it down. He told nobody. One day, while at the 19th hole, enjoying gin rummy and drinks with close friends, the topic of discussion turned to goals. Everyone spoke of their business goals except Dad. He finally relented, telling them of his 10 year plan. They were, according to Dad, stunned. As true friends they attempted to gently advise him of the virtual impossibility of achieving it in 15 years, much less 10.
He thanked them for their concern. It had been almost seven years since he’d written that goal down. He didn’t have the heart to tell them he’d exceeded it almost two years earlier — just half the time his plan allowed.
People mean well. Dad’s friends meant the best for him. Their advice reflected what they believed was possible. If he’d told them of his plan and objective in the beginning, they’d have given the same advice. They were his close buds — they meant the best for him.
That’s exactly why I don’t tell others about my own goals, with the exception of The Boss. And only then when I’m serious as a heart attack. My friends? There a a select few I use as critical sounding boards — those I trust implicitly. But I still don’t tell them the bottom line goals.
It’s my belief goals are more easily achieved by studiously avoiding telling others what they are. But that’s a personal belief, which obviously isn’t true for some. It’s a real paradox, isn’t it?
Greg eschews the psychology of the whole thing, but it interests me to the extent folks need others to goad them on to do the very things that will make their dreams morph into reality. “Hey, George, this is Mike, I’m making $35,000 a year now, but if I do A-Z for the next 12 months, I’ll make $150,000! Would you please keep me motivated to do those things, so I won’t be living paycheck to paycheck? Please?”
Yet if I”m to be consistent, what do I care how Mike attained his goal? A cat skin is a cat skin is a cat skin. Talk about mind games. I get into a circular argument with myself about why, if I’m super motivated to achieve a particular goal, I’d need outside prodding to do what it takes to make it happen. I get it that I don’t need to understand it. Heck, all I need to know is that for many it’s what works — and that’s enough.
A possible answer has occurred to me. As human nature so often demonstrates, we want what we want, but we don’t necessarily wanna do the grunt work required. I understand it intellectually, but not in my gut. The high school baseball star who gets a coupon for two free meals at Taco Bell and a bus ticket to East Toilet Seat Iowa to begin his quest for Major League status, puts up with horrid conditions for many years, with equally horrid pay. He knows his chance for success is very small, probably less than 2%.
Yet we, and that includes me at one time, need outside motivation to achieve a monetary goal we know in our hearts is attainable, assuming we actually, you know, do the work?
I know it works for some, but I’ll never understand it.
Jim Klein says:
Spectacular post IMO, Jeff. There’s no paradox because there’s only one fundamental principle. You’re right that “there’s no one correct way,” which is why some will choose the public commitment route and others will be more private as you are.
In either case though, there is only one actual motivation…one’s own values. Greg makes a good point about how the tangibility of public disclosure can be an asset in turning goals into reality. And for many, a sense of honesty and honor can make public commitment an easier way to motivate themselves, than merely privately making the goals.
And that’s the rub, and why you have it right IMO…not the necessity of the specific method, but the cornerstone principle that the only honor that really counts, is one’s honor of oneself. “Ego-adoration,” if you will. If that’s not the key, I don’t know what is.
I’d say that public commitment can be a useful tool, especially for its “tangibility,” as I’m calling it. But if the respect and/or expectations of others are a /necessary/ part of fulfilling the commitment, then there’s an error being made. Private or public, there can be only one motivator for accomplishing a goal, and that’s one’s own commitment to it. A person will have lofty goals, both in commitment and achievement, only if he believes he is worthy of them. Public commitment may help the process along, but it can’t supplant the underlying motivation. Nothing can ever supplant that, not ever. The only question is whether folks will ever admit it and be proud of it.
“But we’re only human.” No, we’re human only and as soon as someone can point to something more magnificent than that, then I’ll consider the possibility that making goals to something besides ourselves can somehow make them worthwhile, let alone make them happen. Till then, I think you smashed this nail squarely on the head. Well done.
September 7, 2010 — 10:16 pm
Greg Swann says:
> “But we’re only human.”
Gwendolyn Jones is my favorite of the people I have invented in fiction. This is her best line, I think:
“Only human? O, my people! Dare to rise that high!”
This is what Rand had most right, but she ended up drowning it in bile. Egoism is the adoration of values, starting with the self, but the pursuit of those values is egoism in action. And the celebration and cultivation of those kinds of ideas is what the mind is for. Philosophy should be the operating manual for how best to be a human being.
September 7, 2010 — 10:45 pm
Jeff Brown says:
Thanks Scott.
A distinction most of us have observed is how someone can impose a goal on another, insuring it’s attainment through threat of pain if the results are failure. Yet, real zeal is usually present only when the goal is generated from within.
So often the explanation for failure is that the goal may have come from within, but was created as a result of outside pressure. Without our core values as the foundation, trying to make something happen based upon what others, even ourselves, think we ‘should’ do, is almost always doomed to failure before we start.
As you point out, if our own core values aren’t the basis for our actions, desired results rarely result.
September 8, 2010 — 9:16 am
Jim Klein says:
“Egoism is the adoration of values, starting with the self,”
My point precisely. Since everything cognitive is hierarchical, I’d say this “starting” here is very important.
“but the pursuit of those values is egoism in action.”
I can’t see that sort of dichotomy; sounds like mind-body to me. We agree in the result though, since the pursuit of glorious values is itself a glorious action. “The thrill is in the hunt” isn’t totally crazy IMO, at least in many instances.
“And the celebration and cultivation of those kinds of ideas is what the mind is for.”
My best retort is that the conclusion of a process is still part of the process. IOW I agree, but I wouldn’t limit it like this maybe implies. IOOW the entire process is what the mind is for.
“Philosophy should be the operating manual for how best to be a human being.”
I sure agree with that. Hell, I’m so dense I can’t even figure out what the alternative is!
September 8, 2010 — 11:16 am
Greg Swann says:
Here is the full context of Gwen’s thesis:
The idea of “egoism in action” goes back to Janio at a Point, from 1988:
There’s more there than we’re talking about here, but the main point is simply this: You can have plans for a skyscraper but no skyscraper. But you cannot build a skyscraper without plans. Egoism is necessarily both — the idea and the action. Without the follow through, it comes to nothing.
September 8, 2010 — 11:38 am
Greg Swann says:
> I can’t even figure out what the alternative is!
The alternative, and by far the statistical norm, is for philosophy to be the means by which criminals try to con you into surrendering every true value of human life in exchange for nothing — or worse. Looked at that way, true philosophy is something that is only just now aborning, as humanity finally wakes up to the validity of egoism.
September 8, 2010 — 11:50 am
Jim Klein says:
“Looked at that way, true philosophy is something that is only just now aborning, as humanity finally wakes up to the validity of egoism.”
Great stuff…I think I’ll look at it that way!
September 9, 2010 — 7:02 am
Greg Swann says:
> Great stuff…I think I’ll look at it that way!
The true greatness of humanity begins now. We are toddlers just learning to stand on our own two feet. I told you you had good reasons to be cheerful. 😉
September 9, 2010 — 8:47 am