If California doesn’t want to be Texas, it must find a way to be a better California. The easy thing about being Texas is that the government has a great deal of control over the part of its package deal that attracts consumer-voters—it must merely keep taxes low. California, on the other hand, must deliver on the high benefits promised in its sales pitch. It won’t be enough for its state and local governments to spend a lot of money; they have to spend it efficiently and effectively.
The optimistic assessment is that things are going to get worse in California before they get better. The pessimistic assessment is that they’re going to get worse before they get much worse. As is often the case, hanging around with the pessimists is less fun but more instructive. The current recession has driven California’s state government into what amounts to a five-month budget cycle, according to Dan Walters of the Sacramento Bee. He estimates that the budget deal tortuously wrought in July should start falling apart in October, because it was predicated on pie-in-the-sky revenue estimates and because so many of its spending cuts are being challenged, often successfully, in the courts.
The recession will eventually end and California’s finances will improve, say the optimists. Given the state’s pervasive political bias against efficient and effective public services, however, the question is whether its finances will ever get truly well. States that have grown accustomed to thinking of the engine that drives their economies as an inexhaustible resource—whether it’s Michigan and the auto industry, New York and Wall Street, or California and the vision of the sunlit good life that used to attract new residents—find it tough to compete again for what they thought would be theirs forever, and to plan budgets for lean years that turn into lean decades. Instead, they invest their hopes in a deus ex machina that will rescue them from the hard choices they dread.
For California’s governmental-industrial complex, a new liberal administration and Congress in Washington offer plausible hope for a happy Hollywood ending. Federal aid will replace the dollars that California’s taxpayers, fed up with the state’s lousy benefits and high taxes, refuse to provide. Americans will continue to vote with their feet, either by leaving California or disdaining relocation there, but their votes won’t matter, at least in the short term. Under the coming bailout, the new 49ers—Americans in the other 49 states, that is—will be extended the privilege of paying California’s taxes. At least they won’t have to put up with its public services.
Thomas Johnson says:
California has everything: nice weather, pretty views and natural resources, yet they chose spend confiscated wealth on expensive public unions. I don’t think CA has safer communities because of their high dollar police and fire coverage. Now they are broke. There is no provision for a state bankruptcy-the state budget director even looked into tossing the keys to Washington and reverting to territory status.
http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/06/pension-fund-bankruptcy-bailout-personal-finance-ugly choices.html
If we Texans give up our statehood it will be so that we can revert to being on our own: The Republic of Texas.
November 16, 2009 — 8:05 pm
Thomas Johnson says:
Sorry. The link broke: http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/06/pension-fund-bankruptcy-bailout-personal-finance-uglychoices.html
November 16, 2009 — 8:07 pm
Jessica Horton says:
“If we Texans give up our statehood it will be so that we can revert to being on our own: The Republic of Texas.”
I pray every day: “God, move me to Texas.”
November 16, 2009 — 8:41 pm
Teri Lussier says:
>I pray every day: “God, move me to Texas.”
😀
Mine goes more like: “Jamie, can we please move to Texas yet?”
And still, I hate thinking that way. What I’ve been writing is, “Dear Dayton, NOW can we please be more like Texas?”
November 17, 2009 — 9:36 am
Thomas Johnson says:
Teri: It won’t happen. Yankees are just, well, Yankees. Since you cannot change the reality that is Dayton, might I suggest this:
“You may all go to hell and I will go to Texas” (Davy Crockett).
They did, he did, and less than a year later, Davy Crockett achieved immortality, glory and the gratitude of all freedom loving Texans at the Alamo.
November 17, 2009 — 12:02 pm
Al Lorenz says:
The Republic of Texas does have a nice sound to it. I moved from Texas in 1973 as a not yet adult. It was hot and muggy yet returning is looking better every day.
November 17, 2009 — 12:59 pm
Susan says:
>>The easy thing about being Texas is that the government has a great deal of control over the part of its package deal that attracts consumer-voters—it must merely keep taxes low.
I think in light of the mls controversy this is interesting. MLS’s are trying to do all this “stuff” like determining if G is a scraper site. They need to simply provide low fees and get out of our way.
November 18, 2009 — 12:11 pm