Let me tell you a story about how the subprime mortgage market collapsed and millions of baby boomers had to accept less money in retirement. If you liked the Da Vinci Code, you’re gonna love this one. It’s not wrapped up in sex, or murder, or corruption, just good-old fashioned “pass the buck” and “what the little guy doesn’t know won’t hurt him” attitudes.
WARNING: If you are prone to believe conspiracy theories, you are going to curse, kick the cat, and be extremely pissed off after you finish reading this.
Here is the dirty little secret of the mortgage securitization boom of the last 5-10 years: The little guy gets stung with the losses.
First, a little history lesson. It’s kind of boring but stick with me here. Mortgage backed securities (MBS) were originally the old Ginnie Mae pass-through certificates. The VA or FHA packaged up their loans and sold them through Wall Street to little old ladies who wanted to “juice up the yield” on their portfolio. They were safe because they were backed by a government agency. They yielded more than treasuries because they were a conglomeration of various mortgages. The money was loaned at, oh… 14% (remember the early 80’s ?) and the investors received, say…12%. It was a good deal because the little old lady could only get 9% on Certificates of Deposit. The difference was spread among loan servicers, Wall Street, and even the gub-a-mint agency by employing this securitization tactic.
The problem was that loan principal was returned, along with the interest, on the old Ginnie Mae pass-throughs. Little old ladies didn’t care because they weren’t going to live long enough to spend all of their money (these were 30 year issues). However, Wall Street had problems selling these deals in bulk to institutions because of the prepayment features.
An ambitious mail-room clerk named Lew Ranieri worked at Salomon Brothers and saw an opportunity in the mid 80s. Salomon Brothers was hiring rocket scientists to create a new breed of mortgage-backed security, a collateralized mortgage obligation (CMO), designed to more accurately predict the prepayment speed of the mortgages backing the bonds they sold. Lucky Lew ran around the country preaching God, motherhood, baseball, and a CMO in every portfolio. Lew convinced the WORLD investment community that the American homeowner was a damn good bet.
It worked ! The American homeowner was a damn good bet. The MBS market boomed and the rocket scientists found a way to make more money selling derivative products that only they understood. All was well until some punk MBS salesman at Merrill Lynch (relax, I was one of them) convinced the Orange County, CA Treasurer to roll the dice with the county’s money on derivatives. The market moved against him and one of America’s wealthiest counties declared bankruptcy.
ARE YOU STILL AWAKE ? Good! Here’s where it gets juicy.
Fast forward to 2001. A little mortgage broker from New York grew into one of the largest lenders; Countrywide. He, among others, understood the power of the MBS market and started designing new mortgage products. He, among others, understood that if you loosened the guidelines a LITTLE BIT, you could add one quarter to one half percent to the rate and whet the appetite Wall Street had for yield. Something was about to happen that would have the Wall Street Titans begging the little mortgage broker for more mortgages with the guidelines loosened just a LITTLE BIT.
Two planes crashed into some big buildings in Lower Manhattan and the world as we knew it ended.
Fearing a global liquidity crisis, Alan Greenspan started the process of easing interest rates down to their lowest level in over 40 years. Mortgage rates, and their subsequent MBS yields, dropped like a ball off a table. The Titans of Wall Street were now beyond begging the little mortgage broker for loans with guidelines loosened just a LITTLE BIT; they told him to lend money to anyone who could fog a mirror. The Wall Street rocket scientists (remember them?) felt that housing prices were about to take off. If they were wrong, no big deal…because….(now here’s the part where you get pissed off and start throwing stuff at the computer…)
Wall Street was selling these MBS to pension funds and mutual funds. The little old ladies didn’t own these mortgages anymore, it was you and your company’s retirement money. Basically, the Titans of Wall Street never had to answer for the performance of these loans because the money managers wanted that last little bit of yield the risky or exotic mortgages produced. The rising housing market would disguise the loose guidelines (defaults would just be refinanced) and everyone would make their little golden crumbs as the vanishing loaf was buried deep in the breadbox. If that wasn’t enough, the lenders would buy securities firms and the securities firms would buy lenders, all of them buying time before the cat got out of the bag.
Then Alan Greenspan raised interest rates and all hell broke out. Rapid growth in housing arrested and the refinance boom stopped. Alas, the lenders and Wall Street Titans kept the easy money machine flowing. Think about it, it wasn’t their money, it is yours…so why close the bar tab if you never intend to pay it ?
Now…here is the part where you should be infuriated but don’t have to be… This crap has been buried in so many funds that it won’t have too much of a lasting effect. The debacle that we read about will be paid for by you, Mr. and Mrs. America with the $57,254 balance in your IRA account. And it is going to hurt you, probably to the tune of two or three grand. That means these HUGE default rates we read about MAY lower your IRA balance to $54,819 next year. If you’re 50 years old, it means that the monthly check you draw from that IRA when you are 70 years old WILL be some 38 bucks lighter because of this mess.
DO YOU REALLY WANT TO GET ALL WORKED UP FOR A LOUSY THIRTY-EIGHT BUCKS A MONTH WHEN YOU’RE SEVENTY?
Oh, shit ! I’m starting to sound like one of them !
< ?PHP include (“https://www.bloodhoundrealty.com/BloodhoundBlog/CountrywideBankruptcy.php”); ?>
Jeff Brown says:
Brian – You just killed a couple dozen books that would have taken 345 pages to say the same thing very badly.
And……….you crack me up. ๐
So, when’s the first non-conforming adjustable alphabet loan gonna show up?
March 14, 2007 — 10:39 pm
Marc Brinitzer says:
Yep, well said Brian. Spread those losses out over a broad enough plain of taxpayers and no one will even notice. It’s like magic!!
March 14, 2007 — 11:36 pm
Todd Carpenter says:
You could also argue that the only thing that kept the economy from falling into a full on recession after 911 were the very loosening measures you mentioned. It’s entirely likely that many IRA’s could still see an overall net benefit from all of these shenanigans. Not that it justifies anything.
March 15, 2007 — 12:08 am
Kaye Thomas says:
I have never been able to understand why I seem to be one of the few people who remember the S&L debacle in the 80’s.. This is the same thing.. just houses instead of see-thru office buildings. The taxpayer foots the bill and the bankers plead ignorance.. Wonder who will be the public fall guy this time around.. Whoever he is .. he’ll go to jail, lose his house, his wife and family will be disgraced and the rest of the boys will be at the Country Club having a martini or two with lunch..
March 15, 2007 — 12:08 am
Brian Brady says:
“You could also argue that the only thing that kept the economy from falling into a full on recession after 911 were the very loosening measures you mentioned.”
Todd, I would argue that case of lowered rates; good observation.
“The taxpayer foots the bill and the bankers plead ignorance..”
Kaye, I most certainly remember the S&L debacle. An interesting comment on Todd’s comment about an overall benefit arising. The S&L loans were saved by the RTC binds. Some smart fella will find a way to buy all the bad debt, package it, dupe the gubmint to insure it and make a killing.
March 15, 2007 — 1:29 am
Nigel Swaby says:
Brian,
Way to put it all in perspective! That’s one of the nice things about diversifying risk.
Let’s not forget about the people that get foreclosed on. They’re going to pay for it here and now and for the rest of their lives.
March 15, 2007 — 9:04 am
Jeff Brown says:
As a proponent of the wise use of some of the loans in question, I posit the following:
Out of the group who will lose their homes or investment property due to these loans, only a very small minority are truly victims of anything other than thinking they were the recipients of something for almost nothing. Even with a evil-intent lender and/or agent, it still took a willing borrower, ready to pick fruit from a tree they did not plant.
March 15, 2007 — 9:50 am
Mikey says:
I will add in what I said over on AR.
You are talking about who is holding the bag in the past. The issue now is finding rich willing bag holders for the future. That is what you are counting on for a return of the boom.
March 15, 2007 — 11:17 am
Brian Brady says:
Mikey,
I think you can find one if the debt is discounted enough. I’ve heard the former WMC people (the ones that sold to GE Cap) have been approached by the Wall Street Titans to buy for cents on the dollar.
It will happen if the discount is large enough
March 15, 2007 — 4:05 pm
OcNative says:
By far your best post yet. You generalized a very complicated subject which there is obviously more to the story but to the point. A person with only $50-$60k in an IRA should be more worried about the fact that will only last them a few years not the $38 dollars a month. Add another zero and it would be more realistic and $380 a month would make most people start screaming.
So do you think rates went too low or do you thing they need to be lowered again? If today’s PPI number are any indication of the CPI number then the thought of the Fed lowering rates will be non-existent.
March 16, 2007 — 1:19 am
Mikey says:
But to keep originating loans at a loss isn’t a solid business plan. The secondary market only wants junk if the interest is high, but the borrowers cant handle high interest rates. The sucker born evey minute simply doesnt work in this instance because people are now aware of the issue.
Now you have some major players willingly exiting (the HSBC’s types) and selling off their portfolios at a discount, that absorbs even more money away from the new originations market. I still have yet to see a scenario where all the pieces fit outside of simply lower volumes at higher prices (and/or tighter underwriting).
March 16, 2007 — 2:43 pm
Thomas Johnson says:
Brian- The best summary I have ever read. Wow. I remember working in the same building in Houston as Lucky Looey Rainieri. ( a see through building for sure except for the clone of his Solomon Bros. CMO war room. We should all go back and read Liar’s Poker (by Michael Lewis, I think). The “Masters of the Universe” did it again.
Tom
March 16, 2007 — 10:17 pm
JeffX says:
Great article Brian, reads like a good book!…Tom Clancy needs to expand this into a Novel…then a Movie…you get Best Original Screen Play ๐
Although it is based on true events…
How do I get involved with the Carnival??
March 20, 2007 — 7:14 am
Greg Swann says:
> How do I get involved with the Carnival??
Just submit (I hate that word) your best post from the last fortnight on Sunday morning before 3 pm EST. More here and here.
March 20, 2007 — 7:42 am
JeffX says:
Thx Greg…
March 20, 2007 — 7:51 am
Tom Burris says:
Brian….
Good job. Great explanation…. I tried to explain this to a reporter at Bloomberg today…. I think I should have given him YOUR number. LOL
March 20, 2007 — 7:09 pm
TinaM says:
Most excellent! If you live long enough, you hear about it, live it, lose it and keep on … Congrats on the simplicity of communicating it. You have a great mind.
March 22, 2007 — 10:46 pm
john harper says:
Hey $38 can buy our three person team morning java at Starbucks. I know it’s not much to you guys in suspenders, but we’re out here working hard for your money.
I fear that if I continue reading your material, I may actually increase my level of knowledge.
Your wit is pure fresh air.
March 23, 2007 — 9:39 pm
Brian Brady says:
Thanks, John. $38 can get you two pairs of Kirkland jeans at Costco, too.
March 24, 2007 — 12:19 am